29-09-2017, 09:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-09-2017, 12:50 AM by Scott Kaiser.)
I challenge John Newman, whose name has now come up more than once to interpret, decipher, analyze and dictate in detail the three (3) documents that have been 'freely given.'
I'm not asking for me, so, please my haters! Get off it! But, for the respect of the riderless horseman.
Let's settle this once and for all, isn't that what this is about? Him, not you or me!
Hell, I don't even want the recognition, y'all can take all the glory, I just want anyone who is not willing to hide behind some curtain to shed some light on these documents is all I'm saying (for YOUR side.) That would be my reward, [corroboration,] to be, or not to be, that is the question.
It's as simple as asking, do these documents discuss the "Big Event" or not, how hard can that be?
If Newman says it's a no go, or both he and Chris agree, then I will accept, but if Newman agrees with Chris, then, YOU the researchers may have it and do with it what YOU will see how that works? I'm finished, and do not give Newman Chris' assessment, let him do his own so there will be no influence, we shall see.
After all, these documents have got to mean something, how can information of this caliber be so vague?
:: + ::rofl:: = ::