16-11-2018, 11:36 PM
The National Security State was set up by international bankers like Ferdinand Eberstadt along with ex-President Herbert Hoover as a means of disrupting the activities of whichever President was in office.
Apparently, this National Security State succeeded in murdering JFK, framing Nixon (and Agnew) for bogus crimes, sabotaging Jimmy Carter with the Iran Hostage fiasco, and bypassing Congress (working with the Nicaraguan Contras) to make a joke of US law and triggering the Iran-Contra investigations.
The National Security State only likes ringers like Gerald Ford and the Bush family. The Bush family (especially GWB) operated as criminals would be expected to operate after being put into office illegally by SCOTUS and the National Security State.
Then the National Security State set up the 9-11 "controlled demolition" of the World Trade Center killing 3000 which was deja vu all over again for Operation Northwoods (proposed by the killers of JFK to kill Americans in America). And then launched the trillion-dollar Iraq War which left the mid-East in permanent shambles with the resultant Syrian struggle.
What I don't understand is how many, many very informed people on this site (who presumably understand Deep Politics) can approve of such disorganized chaos?
Before the National Security State was set up in the late 40's, the US Government was functioning pretty well without it. What kind of people would knowingly endorse this chaotic situation over and above just letting the American people elect their leaders and let their elected leaders function as per the Constitution of 1787?
I truly believe in running my personal affairs that HONESTY IS THE BEST POLICY!!! The functioning of the National Security State is based on deception, illegality and total dishonesty.
Someone who is informed about the above issues is willingly endorsing a process which is basically the same thing as they have in Russia with the KGB installing their candidate to rule the country, (elections and elected officials be damned).
Why is a KGB installed Putin better than our traditional elected Presidents? You can't have elections and elected leaders if our citizens try to reverse the election results by recourse to MALICIOUS PROSECUTIONS and framing the elected leaders with phony investigations or murder as was done to JFK, Nixon, Carter and Clinton. And now Trump.
The prior posting rejects both the Democrat and Republican Parties. But how can anyone endorse the evil and bizarre activities of the National Security State as being preferable to the legitimate political parties? If one pursues that reasoning, then one is saying that the overt criminal acts of the Bush dynasty (where hundreds of thousands have died and many are still dying in Afghanistan) are preferable to the current situation in Washington.
As bad as Trump seems as an individual, he hasn't actually done anything which even approaches the false flag 9-11 or the Iraq War. If the Mueller chaos were to overthrow the Trump election, then we would be surrendering to the National Security State and that would only produce more Iraq's, Afghanistans, 9-11's, Iran Contra's or maybe even a nuclear war of some kind. The John Boltons and neo-cons would be back in the saddle.
(And none of the above even includes that added problems if Goldman-Sachs and Wells Fargo go off the reservation and the billionaires like Bezos, Soros, Zuckerberg etc. start running wild).
Trump might be a ridiculous buffoon, but the alternative is the Cheney-style disastrous criminality that is the special province of the National Security State run amok.
James Lateer
Apparently, this National Security State succeeded in murdering JFK, framing Nixon (and Agnew) for bogus crimes, sabotaging Jimmy Carter with the Iran Hostage fiasco, and bypassing Congress (working with the Nicaraguan Contras) to make a joke of US law and triggering the Iran-Contra investigations.
The National Security State only likes ringers like Gerald Ford and the Bush family. The Bush family (especially GWB) operated as criminals would be expected to operate after being put into office illegally by SCOTUS and the National Security State.
Then the National Security State set up the 9-11 "controlled demolition" of the World Trade Center killing 3000 which was deja vu all over again for Operation Northwoods (proposed by the killers of JFK to kill Americans in America). And then launched the trillion-dollar Iraq War which left the mid-East in permanent shambles with the resultant Syrian struggle.
What I don't understand is how many, many very informed people on this site (who presumably understand Deep Politics) can approve of such disorganized chaos?
Before the National Security State was set up in the late 40's, the US Government was functioning pretty well without it. What kind of people would knowingly endorse this chaotic situation over and above just letting the American people elect their leaders and let their elected leaders function as per the Constitution of 1787?
I truly believe in running my personal affairs that HONESTY IS THE BEST POLICY!!! The functioning of the National Security State is based on deception, illegality and total dishonesty.
Someone who is informed about the above issues is willingly endorsing a process which is basically the same thing as they have in Russia with the KGB installing their candidate to rule the country, (elections and elected officials be damned).
Why is a KGB installed Putin better than our traditional elected Presidents? You can't have elections and elected leaders if our citizens try to reverse the election results by recourse to MALICIOUS PROSECUTIONS and framing the elected leaders with phony investigations or murder as was done to JFK, Nixon, Carter and Clinton. And now Trump.
The prior posting rejects both the Democrat and Republican Parties. But how can anyone endorse the evil and bizarre activities of the National Security State as being preferable to the legitimate political parties? If one pursues that reasoning, then one is saying that the overt criminal acts of the Bush dynasty (where hundreds of thousands have died and many are still dying in Afghanistan) are preferable to the current situation in Washington.
As bad as Trump seems as an individual, he hasn't actually done anything which even approaches the false flag 9-11 or the Iraq War. If the Mueller chaos were to overthrow the Trump election, then we would be surrendering to the National Security State and that would only produce more Iraq's, Afghanistans, 9-11's, Iran Contra's or maybe even a nuclear war of some kind. The John Boltons and neo-cons would be back in the saddle.
(And none of the above even includes that added problems if Goldman-Sachs and Wells Fargo go off the reservation and the billionaires like Bezos, Soros, Zuckerberg etc. start running wild).
Trump might be a ridiculous buffoon, but the alternative is the Cheney-style disastrous criminality that is the special province of the National Security State run amok.
James Lateer