11-03-2017, 09:25 AM
That the Vault 7 release is only 1% so far boggles the mind given the content thus far. It seems that Assange and Wikileaks weren't joking when they chose the JFK phrase for their password Splinter Into A Thousand Pieces And Scatter Into The Winds.
Also based on what Wikileaks said about why the individual leaked this material it now seems reasonably clear that there are a number of serving and former Intelligence Community officials who have decided to combat the the US security state, which they consider is now operating against the interests of the US Constitution and are illegal.
In a recent interview on Fox Hannity show (below) two former IC types (William Binney and Col. Tony Schaffer) both indicated that "former members of the NSA, retired intelligence guys", using the "malware" that had "Russian fingerprints" on it hacked the DNC and gave it to Wikileaks (thus confirming what former UK former Ambassador Craig Murray has said). Shaffer also added that the DNC and the democrats knew this but pushed the Russian did it story. He added that he has no proof but this is what he's heard and the reason for this was that "concerned Americans were fed up with Clinton doing things... got in there and gave it to Wikileaks". Binney agrees.
Now we have this second release from a "cleared insider" that is designed to shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces, and I don't suppose it's pushing the envelope to say that there is continuing warfare between "concerned Americans" in the CIA and the IC who are intent on bringing the the CIA and other IC entities to heel over their excesses -- presumably in the domestic political arena. William Binney also adds an important observation. The CIA hacking tools are no longer secure, other hackers have accessed them, and yet the CIA did nothing about fixing this leaving everyone everywhere openly vulnerable. And the kicker is that the CIA then asks for more money for cyber security. Binney is suggesting this is an outright scam.
Also based on what Wikileaks said about why the individual leaked this material it now seems reasonably clear that there are a number of serving and former Intelligence Community officials who have decided to combat the the US security state, which they consider is now operating against the interests of the US Constitution and are illegal.
In a recent interview on Fox Hannity show (below) two former IC types (William Binney and Col. Tony Schaffer) both indicated that "former members of the NSA, retired intelligence guys", using the "malware" that had "Russian fingerprints" on it hacked the DNC and gave it to Wikileaks (thus confirming what former UK former Ambassador Craig Murray has said). Shaffer also added that the DNC and the democrats knew this but pushed the Russian did it story. He added that he has no proof but this is what he's heard and the reason for this was that "concerned Americans were fed up with Clinton doing things... got in there and gave it to Wikileaks". Binney agrees.
Now we have this second release from a "cleared insider" that is designed to shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces, and I don't suppose it's pushing the envelope to say that there is continuing warfare between "concerned Americans" in the CIA and the IC who are intent on bringing the the CIA and other IC entities to heel over their excesses -- presumably in the domestic political arena. William Binney also adds an important observation. The CIA hacking tools are no longer secure, other hackers have accessed them, and yet the CIA did nothing about fixing this leaving everyone everywhere openly vulnerable. And the kicker is that the CIA then asks for more money for cyber security. Binney is suggesting this is an outright scam.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14