28-07-2017, 01:19 AM
The presented evidence of a hoax regarding the 2nd floor lunchroom encounter appears to me to be twofold, slim and none. Not seeing someone, especially someone mobile, does not prove that they were not there, and likewise, not witnessing an event is not proof that it did not happen.
Eyewitnesses and participants have given statements/testimony that indicates that the 2nd floor lunchroom encounter did occur, and I do not know of any reliable eyewitness testimony/statement that is seen as confirmation that it did not happen.
Any attempt at libeling deceased persons as liars is not, in my opinion, a sufficient presentation of actual proof.
Eyewitnesses and participants have given statements/testimony that indicates that the 2nd floor lunchroom encounter did occur, and I do not know of any reliable eyewitness testimony/statement that is seen as confirmation that it did not happen.
Any attempt at libeling deceased persons as liars is not, in my opinion, a sufficient presentation of actual proof.
Larry
StudentofAssassinationResearch