01-08-2017, 10:32 PM
And again...to continue...
After careful and deliberate study, strongly enhanced by the research of Richard Gilbride, I have to conclude that LeeHarveyOswald cannot be "disappeared" from the 2nd floor lunchroom at 12:31pm/12:32pm CST, nor can he be "magically appeared" on the Elm St entrance landing/steps/sidewalk at 12:30pm CST.
As the motorcade drove past the Elm St entrance at about 12:30pm, there were multiple doorway/landing/steps area occupants, that were employed at the TSBD building, and yet there is not any reliable eyewitness testimony that affirms LHO's presence at the time. And, most of said occupants very likely would have recognized their fellow TSBD building employee.
So, at 12:30pm-12:32pm, CST, LHO was where he was, and he wasn't where he wasn't. And suppositions, no matter how often repeated, cannot alter true facts.
A conclusion? Absolutely! Evidenced based? Absolutely![/QUOTE]
After careful and deliberate study, strongly enhanced by the research of Richard Gilbride, I have to conclude that LeeHarveyOswald cannot be "disappeared" from the 2nd floor lunchroom at 12:31pm/12:32pm CST, nor can he be "magically appeared" on the Elm St entrance landing/steps/sidewalk at 12:30pm CST.
As the motorcade drove past the Elm St entrance at about 12:30pm, there were multiple doorway/landing/steps area occupants, that were employed at the TSBD building, and yet there is not any reliable eyewitness testimony that affirms LHO's presence at the time. And, most of said occupants very likely would have recognized their fellow TSBD building employee.
So, at 12:30pm-12:32pm, CST, LHO was where he was, and he wasn't where he wasn't. And suppositions, no matter how often repeated, cannot alter true facts.
A conclusion? Absolutely! Evidenced based? Absolutely![/QUOTE]
Larry
StudentofAssassinationResearch