03-08-2017, 06:32 PM
On Friday, November 22, 1963
"As an officer rushed into the building Oswald rushed out. The policeman permitted him to pass after the building manager told the policeman that Oswald was an employee." Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry
Into the building ='s at ground level entrance
"The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside & met
me at the door & went in with me. Shortly after I entered the
building I confronted Oswald. We left Oswald there, & the supervisor
showed me the way upstairs".
Conclusion: this encounter was on the ground level
"Shortly after the shooting we raced back into the building. We saw Oswald in a small storage room on the ground floor". -- O. Virgil Campbell
Conclusion: this encountercompleting a trifecta of sightingswas also down on the ground floor
On Saturday, November 23, 1963
Enter Mrs. Reid with a bogus claim of encountering the wrongfully accused on the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor the day before.
Her account has been proven to be an outright lie.
Why was she compelled to lie? Who gave her the bogus, contrived script?
As if Mrs. Reid's outright lie wasn't enough already, now Enters the first of a multitude of changing affidavits by Officer Baker (get your lies, err, "facts" straight man)
A contrived script has been spawned…
Off the record discussions are now a reoccurring the theme…
The only fair foregone conclusion from any objective individual would be to ask: Why all of a sudden
24hrs later--did real events have to be swept quietly away and concealed from public consumption, while being replaced with a false narrative in order to FRAME an innocent party?
The plain simple truth doesn't require discussions off the record;
a contrived script to follow;
coerced "evidence" under the paralyzing threat of Or Else;
nor reliance upon "credible" witnesses like Mrs. Reid to embellish an outright lie about a staged event that never took place.
Unlike the plain simple truth, a lie needs more lies, discussions off the record for modification sake, coercion, leading witnesses to a desired outcome regardless of the less than honourable intentions to FRAME an innocent party.
Justice is blind they say, but in the context of this criminal activity forced upon a nation, someone needs to remove her blindfold and shed light on the real culprits in the JFK case. An action looooonng overdue.
Now, back to those still lingering, unanswered questions --->
Why didn't Baker recognize the wrongfully accuse IF he really had encountered him earlier in the day in the 2nd floor lunch room?
Why doesn't Baker or Truly's testimony reflect encounters with James Jarman?
Harold Norman?
Bonnie Ray Williams?
These men used the same stairs as Baker and Truly, yet no Baker testimony about sticking his gun in their tummy's and asking Truly to vouch for them...remember, lest we forget, all of these men denied seeing Truly & Baker on the same stairwell they descended from the 5th floor, yet Truly and Baker contend they left Oswald and continued onward up the same set of stairs to the 5th floor, where these men had come down from.
Why doesn't there exist an actual film and/or video recording demonstrating that Baker actually went into the Texas School Book Depository via the front steps?
Why was the film depicting him running towards the TSBD suddenly cut off before the above question could be answered conclusively? Did someone/some entity need to hide Baker's sprint to the corner of Elm & Houston?
Who was the motorcycle officer in the white helmet who rode the elevator up to the 5th floor?
Weren't the elevators stuck according to Truly?
They couldn't have been because the motorcycle officer who rode the elevator up to the 5th floor did it in the same time sequence that employee Bonnie Ray Williams saw him get off, before making his way down the same stairs as Truly and Baker were supposedly coming up...yet no mention of a gun being stuck in Williams' midsection until Truly vouched for him....
Why did four people (Mr. Dougherty and the aforementioned three other employees) dispute Truly's claim that he called up for the elevators?
Why did Mrs. Reid feel compelled to tell an outright lie about a phantom 2nd floor encounter with the wrongfully accused? Why did Baker need four different versions to get his lies, err, "facts" straight?
All of these open, lingering questions point to a contrived script about a phantom 2nd floor encounter that simply did not happen.
The plain simple truth --->
On Friday, November 22, 1963
"As an officer rushed into the building Oswald rushed out. The policeman permitted him to pass after the building manager told the policeman that Oswald was an employee." Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry
Into the building ='s at ground level entrance
"The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside & met
me at the door & went in with me. Shortly after I entered the
building I confronted Oswald. We left Oswald there, & the supervisor
showed me the way upstairs".
Conclusion: this encounter was on the ground level
"Shortly after the shooting we raced back into the building. We saw Oswald in a small storage room on the ground floor". -- O. Virgil Campbell
Conclusion: this encountercompleting a trifecta of sightingswas also down on the ground floor
"As an officer rushed into the building Oswald rushed out. The policeman permitted him to pass after the building manager told the policeman that Oswald was an employee." Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry
Into the building ='s at ground level entrance
"The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside & met
me at the door & went in with me. Shortly after I entered the
building I confronted Oswald. We left Oswald there, & the supervisor
showed me the way upstairs".
Conclusion: this encounter was on the ground level
"Shortly after the shooting we raced back into the building. We saw Oswald in a small storage room on the ground floor". -- O. Virgil Campbell
Conclusion: this encountercompleting a trifecta of sightingswas also down on the ground floor
On Saturday, November 23, 1963
Enter Mrs. Reid with a bogus claim of encountering the wrongfully accused on the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor the day before.
Her account has been proven to be an outright lie.
Why was she compelled to lie? Who gave her the bogus, contrived script?
As if Mrs. Reid's outright lie wasn't enough already, now Enters the first of a multitude of changing affidavits by Officer Baker (get your lies, err, "facts" straight man)
A contrived script has been spawned…
Off the record discussions are now a reoccurring the theme…
The only fair foregone conclusion from any objective individual would be to ask: Why all of a sudden
24hrs later--did real events have to be swept quietly away and concealed from public consumption, while being replaced with a false narrative in order to FRAME an innocent party?
The plain simple truth doesn't require discussions off the record;
a contrived script to follow;
coerced "evidence" under the paralyzing threat of Or Else;
nor reliance upon "credible" witnesses like Mrs. Reid to embellish an outright lie about a staged event that never took place.
Unlike the plain simple truth, a lie needs more lies, discussions off the record for modification sake, coercion, leading witnesses to a desired outcome regardless of the less than honourable intentions to FRAME an innocent party.
Justice is blind they say, but in the context of this criminal activity forced upon a nation, someone needs to remove her blindfold and shed light on the real culprits in the JFK case. An action looooonng overdue.
Now, back to those still lingering, unanswered questions --->
Why didn't Baker recognize the wrongfully accuse IF he really had encountered him earlier in the day in the 2nd floor lunch room?
Why doesn't Baker or Truly's testimony reflect encounters with James Jarman?
Harold Norman?
Bonnie Ray Williams?
These men used the same stairs as Baker and Truly, yet no Baker testimony about sticking his gun in their tummy's and asking Truly to vouch for them...remember, lest we forget, all of these men denied seeing Truly & Baker on the same stairwell they descended from the 5th floor, yet Truly and Baker contend they left Oswald and continued onward up the same set of stairs to the 5th floor, where these men had come down from.
Why doesn't there exist an actual film and/or video recording demonstrating that Baker actually went into the Texas School Book Depository via the front steps?
Why was the film depicting him running towards the TSBD suddenly cut off before the above question could be answered conclusively? Did someone/some entity need to hide Baker's sprint to the corner of Elm & Houston?
Who was the motorcycle officer in the white helmet who rode the elevator up to the 5th floor?
Weren't the elevators stuck according to Truly?
They couldn't have been because the motorcycle officer who rode the elevator up to the 5th floor did it in the same time sequence that employee Bonnie Ray Williams saw him get off, before making his way down the same stairs as Truly and Baker were supposedly coming up...yet no mention of a gun being stuck in Williams' midsection until Truly vouched for him....
Why did four people (Mr. Dougherty and the aforementioned three other employees) dispute Truly's claim that he called up for the elevators?
Why did Mrs. Reid feel compelled to tell an outright lie about a phantom 2nd floor encounter with the wrongfully accused? Why did Baker need four different versions to get his lies, err, "facts" straight?
All of these open, lingering questions point to a contrived script about a phantom 2nd floor encounter that simply did not happen.
The plain simple truth --->
On Friday, November 22, 1963
"As an officer rushed into the building Oswald rushed out. The policeman permitted him to pass after the building manager told the policeman that Oswald was an employee." Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry
Into the building ='s at ground level entrance
"The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside & met
me at the door & went in with me. Shortly after I entered the
building I confronted Oswald. We left Oswald there, & the supervisor
showed me the way upstairs".
Conclusion: this encounter was on the ground level
"Shortly after the shooting we raced back into the building. We saw Oswald in a small storage room on the ground floor". -- O. Virgil Campbell
Conclusion: this encountercompleting a trifecta of sightingswas also down on the ground floor