07-08-2017, 08:14 PM
Alan Ford Wrote:A moot point as in Mrs. Reid's proven lie negates the rest of the lies about a phantom 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor encounter...
*IF the contrived 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor encounter had really happened, both Baker and Truly's testimonies would have also reflected/included encounters with...
Mr. Norman (Harold)…Didn't happen, Strike One!
Mr. Williams (Bonnie Ray)…Didn't happen, Strike Two!!
Mr. Jarman (James)…Didn't happen, Strike Three!!!
In their haste to FRAME an innocent party, those truly responsible for the murder of a sitting democratically elected representative of the people simply forgot to address the small, yet important, details in their hastily contrived script…details that would have surely included encounters with the aforementioned trio IF Baker & Truly were anywhere near and/or actually running up on those same stairs as their contrived script reads.
Now, enough of the phantom 2nd floor encounter smoke-screen, back to the still lingering, unanswered questions at hand…
*The white helmeted motorcycle policeman who actually rode an elevator up to the 5[SUP]th[/SUP] floor, Who was/is this man ?
*Why did Mrs. Reid feel compelled to lie about her phantom 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor encounter with the wrongfully accused ? Who recruited her into the viper pit of liars ?
*Why did Truly lie about the availability of the elevators ?
Not a single individual (0-4 total) individuals actually positioned in close proximity of the elevators heard him call up for an elevator.
Did they suddenly go deaf? Riight!
And then miraculously heal an instant later?, after Truly finished yelling up for the same? The problem with lies is they create a host of other lies.
*Why did officialdom need multiple, repeated off the record discussions with both Truly & Baker ?
The plain simple truth doesn't require off the record discussions, retakes, modifications and/or reliance upon Mrs. Reid's outright lie (only an initial liethe 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor encounter-- needed her additional lie…no great surprise, since lies usually require a host of other lies).
Anything attached to one lie is already a lie (Mrs. Reid's outright lie was needed to enhance yet another lie, one parroted over and over again, and again by Truly & Baker about their phantom 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] floor encounter with the wrongfully accused.
Again, the plain simple truth ---->
Friday, November 22, 1963
"As an officer rushed into the building Oswald rushed out. The policeman permitted him to pass after the building manager told the policeman that Oswald was an employee." Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry
Into the building ='s down on the first floor main entrance, quote, into the building
"The man who said he was the building superintendent was outside & met
me at the door & went in with me. Shortly after I entered the
building I confronted Oswald. We left Oswald there, & the supervisor
showed me the way upstairs".
Conclusion: this encounter was down on the first floor.
"Shortly after the shooting we raced back into the building. We saw Oswald in a small storage room on the ground floor". -- O. Virgil Campbell
Conclusion: this encountercompleting a trifecta of sightingswas also down on the first floor
Saturday, November 23, 1963...a hastily contrived script rears its lying head...and the mounting lies simply out grow the hastily contrived script.
Who was that white helmeted motorcycle officer who rode up on an elevator up to the 5[SUP]th[/SUP] floor before Mr. Williams (Bonnie Ray) began his descent from the 5[SUP]th[/SUP] floor ?
Funny Truly & Baker also omit this elevator motorcycle officer's presence from their hastily contrived script. What the populace has been told and what the plain simple truth is is altogether two different things.
Mrs. Reid.
Judas, err, Truly.
et tu?@ 4triesBaker...Who needs multiple off the record discussions & four different versions to account for a singular event?
Very telling that the still lingering questions within this thread remain unanswered...
Guess it's much easier to parrot back the same lie over and over again than actually commit to answering these challenging questions. Moreover, IF the truth was being told, these questions wouldn't even exist anyway...but that's the problem with phantom encounters they raise more questions than share the plain simple truth.
Assertions, without direct quotes of COMPLETE TESTIMONY/STATEMENTS, including relative TIMING, ​is to me an indication of a lack of reliable evidence for expressed assertions.
Larry
StudentofAssassinationResearch