25-08-2017, 01:04 AM
(This post was last modified: 25-08-2017, 02:50 AM by Jim DiEugenio.)
Mr Trotter,
Can you please show me where that appears in the article as edited at Kennedysandking.com?
As per Gilbride, on page 42 of Whitewash 2, Harold writes about the WC version of the lunchroom encounter and what Baker's testimony means to it for the Report. He then writes:
"The following documents and God knows how many more as yet undiscovered, destroy the basic parts of Baker's story."
After referring to file numbers, Harold immediately begins to quote from Baker's first day affidavit. He then quotes Truly and Marvin Johnson, and those also contradict the official story.
That is what intrigued me to write about the incident.
Can you please show me where that appears in the article as edited at Kennedysandking.com?
As per Gilbride, on page 42 of Whitewash 2, Harold writes about the WC version of the lunchroom encounter and what Baker's testimony means to it for the Report. He then writes:
"The following documents and God knows how many more as yet undiscovered, destroy the basic parts of Baker's story."
After referring to file numbers, Harold immediately begins to quote from Baker's first day affidavit. He then quotes Truly and Marvin Johnson, and those also contradict the official story.
That is what intrigued me to write about the incident.