24-08-2018, 03:18 PM
I have followed the above discussions about JFK and Vietnam and his foreign policy in the Congo, Indonesia etc. My curiosity has been raised about the reaction of Mr. DiEugenio to the book The Skorzeny Papers and JFK foreign policy.
Do any of the JFK foreign policy gurus think that The Skorzeny Papers sheds any new light into the foreign policy issues of the JFK administration? I am particularly intrigued with the dispute about the theory of author Ganis regarding the motive behind the assassination. In the major review of the Ganis book, the theory of Ganis about the motive of Skorzeny and those who employed him is questioned.
What does anybody else think about this? As many people know, I believe that it was the policy of JFK toward the issues in central Europe which got him into hot water, more than his Vietnam policy.
James Lateer
Do any of the JFK foreign policy gurus think that The Skorzeny Papers sheds any new light into the foreign policy issues of the JFK administration? I am particularly intrigued with the dispute about the theory of author Ganis regarding the motive behind the assassination. In the major review of the Ganis book, the theory of Ganis about the motive of Skorzeny and those who employed him is questioned.
What does anybody else think about this? As many people know, I believe that it was the policy of JFK toward the issues in central Europe which got him into hot water, more than his Vietnam policy.
James Lateer
