16-09-2018, 11:30 AM
Paul Rigby Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:I'd warn you that terms used in the article above, such as "Cultural Marxist (social justice) organizations" are alt-right terms, ultra-right terms - as if social justice movements are evil and social justice is not a positive ideal. Yes, there are sometimes critiques of the same features of things wrong by both the left and right, but why chose those from the right with their hidden messages and argot of anti-progress, racism, etc.?
All fair & interesting points, but you miss a key element - the silence of the Left on too many conspiratorial facts & events. Great swathes of the Left refuse to face some deeply unpleasant truths, partly due to the influence of gatekeepers, but mainly due to what? Inertia, intellectual cowardice &/or sloth?
The problem as I see it with the Left - at least in the Labour Party in the UK - is that they have been Blairized; they're now virtually indistinguishable from the Conservatives in many ways (ditto the Dems in the US). And we've seen how Corbyn has been tarnished quite unfairly with the anti-Semitism reporting. Corbyn is avowedly anti Israeli policy, but not an anti-Semite but it is this that has been designedly conflated even though it is
ridiculous to suggest he is. But that's what's happened and it's taken hold by regular media repetition of that meme.
My view is that "globalism" is, in fact, neoliberalism on Viagra. Controlling and focusing the use of money is what it is all about. Nothing else really matters other than the control that money provides.
It is an utterly vile ideology that sees the wealth of the world captured by a tiny, tiny, tiny elite - and the wealth acquired by that elite is used to skew and overwrite democracy to the point that it has become meaningless in in all but name -- but is kept in place purely for PR reasons and to keep the many uninformed and powerless.
Not to repeat what I've said a number of times before over the years (but I'm going to anyway - yawn), this was planned and set in motion by the Rhodes-Milner Oxford Group over one hundred years ago.
In Quigley's dense and difficult to read book The Anglo American Establishment, hidden in a small footnote (of Chapter 3 - and yes I read every word of it well... over 20 years ago) were the words penned by Rhodes to his Secretary, W T Stead circa 1896-ish, that outlined the purpose of the Cecil Rhodes secret society: "to absorb the wealth of the world". The purpose was to forge a federal union between Britain and the United States. While that didn't happen in fact it has almost happened in practise in that both operate in lock-step, imo. Both are military allies in virtually every war, both hold the main banking centres of the world in London and New York etc.
A later plan, well after Rhodes death but still promulgated by the Oxford Group was to to take effective control of the world's governments via the central banking elite (stated in Quigley massive wrist-wrenching Tragedy & Hope), with a view to returning the world to a "feudalist society" where the elite would have total control once again.
That's where we are today. Sadly.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14