14-02-2020, 11:19 PM
...I would also like to add...although the Ganis, the Caufield and the JVB books have been reviewed, that's not the same as saying that the serious issues and new ground broken by them has ever been discussed. We know that there are endless discussions about the length of Oswald's rifle, for instance, but no discussion at all about the Caufield and Baker theories, and only a modest amount regarding the Skorzeny Papers.
When attacking the J V Baker book, no one ever says "her book ties Oswald to the US Government biological weapons program." That fact is, to me, the most obvious reason her book is so virulently attacked, since that whole subject is probably the most sensitive US Government state secret. Ditto with the 9-11 anthrax attack. Subject dropped. Case closed.
And no one ever says "Dr. Caufield, the man who conclusively ties Oswald to James O Eastland and his near-miss at destroying MLK and the Civil Rights movement." By the way, I live in a city of 40,000 and I'm likely the only resident who knows about that connection. Ridiculous! Where is Oliver Stone when you need him???? Caufield's book is monumental IMHO. Should be must reading for everyone here.
The Ganis book on Skorzeny gets much more fair treatment because there has been much discussion on Deep Politics Forum about the Operation Valkyrie connection to the JFK plot. But this in-depth discussion doesn't take place regarding the Baker and Caufield material. And even the entire scenario built up by Ganis in "Skorzeny" isn't IMHO really evaluated or explained. with regard to all the people that he mentions.
What I have learned from my experience is that the truth about the JFK murder is SELF-SUPPRESSING!!! By that I mean that if people think for a moment that they have discovered the truth about the JFK hit, that they have a hot potato on their mind and WHY BOTHER??? Someone may be watching or listening... "Zip your lip " is the watch-word.
And this, of course, is a truism about 9-11, Pearl Harbor, East German Communism, The Cuban Missile Crisis, the Battleship Maine, etc.etc.etc.
Lies are the air that most people breathe, so to speak. The JFK lies have many fathers, but the truth is an orphan.
The typical JFK book has one review for every 10 sales on Amazon. Based on that, my book should have 25 to 30 reviews. That is about the number racked up by "General Walker" by Caufield whose sales are comparable to mine.
But I have had only two reviews, ONE OF WHICH WAS IMMEDIATELY WITHDRAWN!!!! So that leaves only one review. But as I said, The Three Barons has been listed in libraries around the world, in at least fifteen countries, off-and-on. Currently, it is in seven countries. The price for used copies has remained at almost the level of new copies, which is unusual for books on Amazon. So it seems that people are hanging on to their copies and not selling, donating or discarding them. (Maybe they're scared to donate them. Never thought of that!)
Finally, I don't advocate reading the indexes of JFK books in lieu of reading the actual book. My only point there is that the citations of names in the indexes is a convenient way to mathematically group the books. Obviously, the index to the Warren Commission Report would largely devoid of the names of the true plotters, and padded with the names of irrelevant witnesses. So correlation with the Warren Report is a bad sign, IMHO (regarding citations).
Granted, the Bugliosi book will have a panoply of names. But Bugliosi and Gerald Posner are the only authors I know of who have published deliberately false theories if you exclude the Warren Commission itself. For virtually all the other books, the names cited follow along the lines of the particular theory of the author regarding the JFK plot and murder. Of course, EVERY book cites JFK, RFK, Lyndon Johnson, Lee Harvey Oswald, etc. etc. etc. But if there are a lot of CIA names, in proportion, then it's a "CIA did it" book. Ditto for the "mafia did it" or "people in New Orleans did it", etc.
In summary, the only facts I would have liked to include (which I missed) is the Nazi connection to David Harold Byrd, the owner of the TBSD and the Nazi connection to the Berkeley Microbiology Lab and Clay Shaw. With these two exceptions, I think that I have documented pretty much all of facts necessary to understand the JFK assassination. But let the readers be the final judges. I'm fine with that.
James Lateer
When attacking the J V Baker book, no one ever says "her book ties Oswald to the US Government biological weapons program." That fact is, to me, the most obvious reason her book is so virulently attacked, since that whole subject is probably the most sensitive US Government state secret. Ditto with the 9-11 anthrax attack. Subject dropped. Case closed.
And no one ever says "Dr. Caufield, the man who conclusively ties Oswald to James O Eastland and his near-miss at destroying MLK and the Civil Rights movement." By the way, I live in a city of 40,000 and I'm likely the only resident who knows about that connection. Ridiculous! Where is Oliver Stone when you need him???? Caufield's book is monumental IMHO. Should be must reading for everyone here.
The Ganis book on Skorzeny gets much more fair treatment because there has been much discussion on Deep Politics Forum about the Operation Valkyrie connection to the JFK plot. But this in-depth discussion doesn't take place regarding the Baker and Caufield material. And even the entire scenario built up by Ganis in "Skorzeny" isn't IMHO really evaluated or explained. with regard to all the people that he mentions.
What I have learned from my experience is that the truth about the JFK murder is SELF-SUPPRESSING!!! By that I mean that if people think for a moment that they have discovered the truth about the JFK hit, that they have a hot potato on their mind and WHY BOTHER??? Someone may be watching or listening... "Zip your lip " is the watch-word.
And this, of course, is a truism about 9-11, Pearl Harbor, East German Communism, The Cuban Missile Crisis, the Battleship Maine, etc.etc.etc.
Lies are the air that most people breathe, so to speak. The JFK lies have many fathers, but the truth is an orphan.
The typical JFK book has one review for every 10 sales on Amazon. Based on that, my book should have 25 to 30 reviews. That is about the number racked up by "General Walker" by Caufield whose sales are comparable to mine.
But I have had only two reviews, ONE OF WHICH WAS IMMEDIATELY WITHDRAWN!!!! So that leaves only one review. But as I said, The Three Barons has been listed in libraries around the world, in at least fifteen countries, off-and-on. Currently, it is in seven countries. The price for used copies has remained at almost the level of new copies, which is unusual for books on Amazon. So it seems that people are hanging on to their copies and not selling, donating or discarding them. (Maybe they're scared to donate them. Never thought of that!)
Finally, I don't advocate reading the indexes of JFK books in lieu of reading the actual book. My only point there is that the citations of names in the indexes is a convenient way to mathematically group the books. Obviously, the index to the Warren Commission Report would largely devoid of the names of the true plotters, and padded with the names of irrelevant witnesses. So correlation with the Warren Report is a bad sign, IMHO (regarding citations).
Granted, the Bugliosi book will have a panoply of names. But Bugliosi and Gerald Posner are the only authors I know of who have published deliberately false theories if you exclude the Warren Commission itself. For virtually all the other books, the names cited follow along the lines of the particular theory of the author regarding the JFK plot and murder. Of course, EVERY book cites JFK, RFK, Lyndon Johnson, Lee Harvey Oswald, etc. etc. etc. But if there are a lot of CIA names, in proportion, then it's a "CIA did it" book. Ditto for the "mafia did it" or "people in New Orleans did it", etc.
In summary, the only facts I would have liked to include (which I missed) is the Nazi connection to David Harold Byrd, the owner of the TBSD and the Nazi connection to the Berkeley Microbiology Lab and Clay Shaw. With these two exceptions, I think that I have documented pretty much all of facts necessary to understand the JFK assassination. But let the readers be the final judges. I'm fine with that.
James Lateer