21-12-2009, 12:23 AM
(This post was last modified: 21-12-2009, 12:56 AM by Charles Drago.)
Honor is due, Jim, for the J. C. King ID and the "fallback patsy" acknowledgement -- whether or not King so qualifies.
I cannot trump your first-hand experience with the Holt brood, so I'll remain silent and be thought the fool.
To my knowledge Phillips inherited (operational control of) the Western Hemisphere -- if you'll excuse the warranted hyperbole -- from King and his masters, the Rockefellers.
This view of King is lifed from Thy Will be Done -- which remains essential reading for all of us. I don't have any others, but that's why God made James Richards.
Another word about the "fallback patsies" notion: You are in harmony with the Evica/Drago JFK conspiracy construct hypothesis when you reference the great depth of the doppelganger element in all of this.
Buy a suit at a high-end haberdasher. Step up to stand within the mirrors.
So many images.
But guess who pays for the shmata?
I cannot trump your first-hand experience with the Holt brood, so I'll remain silent and be thought the fool.
To my knowledge Phillips inherited (operational control of) the Western Hemisphere -- if you'll excuse the warranted hyperbole -- from King and his masters, the Rockefellers.
This view of King is lifed from Thy Will be Done -- which remains essential reading for all of us. I don't have any others, but that's why God made James Richards.
Another word about the "fallback patsies" notion: You are in harmony with the Evica/Drago JFK conspiracy construct hypothesis when you reference the great depth of the doppelganger element in all of this.
Buy a suit at a high-end haberdasher. Step up to stand within the mirrors.
So many images.
But guess who pays for the shmata?