28-01-2010, 05:05 PM
Dawn Meredith Wrote:James H. Fetzer Wrote:I have examined Jack's comparisons and, in my opinion, he is wrong in his conclusion.Well, since you deny being an expert on these matters, while Jack clearly is, I don't get it. Jack not only has superior competence for making these judgments but has offered proof that Adams and Mainman are not the same. I find non-responsive sarcasm to be reliable indicator of deceit and deception. I invite everyone to make up their minds for themselves. The evidence is clear.
Dr. Fetzer, because he disagrees with yourself and Jack does not make him deceptive. Please do not call forum members derogatory names. This behavior may be tolerated on other sites but not here. Arguments must be devoid of such behavior. Name calling should be seen as beneath us. It demeans the poster, and weakens the argument.
Dawn
I concur entirely Dawn. What is often tolerable elsewhere is not acceptable here. Our rules are very clear on this point (see: http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/...d.php?t=58), and the reason for these inhibitions are also well known and quite obvious.
Civilized behaviour and language is an absolute requirement even when parties vehemently disagree.
This injunction applies to all members at all times.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14