13-01-2011, 04:51 PM
I am all but certain that conspirators other than those with technical site responsibilities were in DP during the attack. I am equally confident that individuals who, while innocent of involvement in the conspiracy, would later fall into the Likely Suspect category were sent to Dallas on or about the 22nd so as to support the False Sponsor aspects of the plot and/or to falsely incriminate them for future blackmail purposes.
I find the "Conein" and "Morales" and "Robertson" and even the "Hemming" photo IDs to be unconvincing. Nor do I accept the Ambassador Hotel IDs (Morales, et al) as legitimate.
And I should add that, for the same reason, the forensic reconstructions presented by Lois Gibson regarding the Tramps -- especially "Frenchy" -- are, for me, invalid.
So too the skull reconstructions which "prove" that Martin Bormann died in Berlin and Josef Mengele drowned in South American waters.
The reason: None of the identification METHODS have been subjected to objective scientific analysis.
Morgan, your "lock" on the GPH photo ID interests me a great deal. Can you go into detail regarding the evidence that convinces you?
Many thanks,
Charles
I find the "Conein" and "Morales" and "Robertson" and even the "Hemming" photo IDs to be unconvincing. Nor do I accept the Ambassador Hotel IDs (Morales, et al) as legitimate.
And I should add that, for the same reason, the forensic reconstructions presented by Lois Gibson regarding the Tramps -- especially "Frenchy" -- are, for me, invalid.
So too the skull reconstructions which "prove" that Martin Bormann died in Berlin and Josef Mengele drowned in South American waters.
The reason: None of the identification METHODS have been subjected to objective scientific analysis.
Morgan, your "lock" on the GPH photo ID interests me a great deal. Can you go into detail regarding the evidence that convinces you?
Many thanks,
Charles