13-01-2011, 06:48 PM
Thanks, Morgan.
It's my understanding that certain scientific disciplines may be relevant to the identification processes of which we write.
Back to the skull/facial reconstruction business: I have yet to see a blind test run on the skull of a known individual. Which doesn't mean such an experiment has not taken place. And certainly I understand that it would be difficult in the extreme to find such a skull and secure permission to subject it to the appropriate tests.
As for photos: Are there not objective measurement criteria to be applied? Width between eyes? Ear lobe configuration? etc.?
I'm familiar with the "Hemming" DP photo you reference. Would it be possible for you to post it and the best Hemming comparison view(s)?
I might add for the sake of future discussion that even if Hemming's presence in DP during the attack can be established, in and of itself it cannot implicate him in the conspiracy.
It's my understanding that certain scientific disciplines may be relevant to the identification processes of which we write.
Back to the skull/facial reconstruction business: I have yet to see a blind test run on the skull of a known individual. Which doesn't mean such an experiment has not taken place. And certainly I understand that it would be difficult in the extreme to find such a skull and secure permission to subject it to the appropriate tests.
As for photos: Are there not objective measurement criteria to be applied? Width between eyes? Ear lobe configuration? etc.?
I'm familiar with the "Hemming" DP photo you reference. Would it be possible for you to post it and the best Hemming comparison view(s)?
I might add for the sake of future discussion that even if Hemming's presence in DP during the attack can be established, in and of itself it cannot implicate him in the conspiracy.