13-01-2011, 09:13 PM
Morgan Reynolds Wrote:Implicate Hemming? What was he doing there? Just a regular guy getting a peek at JFK and Jackie? A JM/WAVE, Alpha 66 guy? Hemming was CIA big-time, for example, Twyman's Bloody Treason devotes his longest chapter to him. As I said, once I saw that pic, I'd arrest Hemming post haste, subpoena every relevant thing I wanted and start cracking that baby wide open. Also, it's alleged he seemed to go where LHO went.
[IMG]file:///Users/morganreynolds/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/moz-screenshot.png[/IMG][IMG]file:///Users/morganreynolds/Desktop/JFKhemming16.jpg[/IMG]
Morgan,
Agreed on the limitations of the scientific method and those who would apply it.
I "knew" GPH in the sense that we met and dined together. That plus I was part of the first and, to my knowledge, only panel to question him pubicly. Which means nothing in terms of this exchange. But I am aware of his size and presence. Not to mention his c.v.
For the record, I'm unwilling to conclude that GPH's presence in Dealey Plaza during the attack would implicate him as a co-conspirator only to the extent that I hold open the possibility that he was sent there to add to the complexity behind which the assassination's true Sponsors and Facilitators continue to find refuge.
I'm also sensitive to Jack's appreciation of after-the-fact actions taken to ... as we'd say in the 'hood ... throw shit in the game. The creation by conspiracy Facilitators of what I term cognitive dissonance, both at the time of the murder and in its wake, serves to divert, disinform, and ultimately disarm investigators. Not to mention that it helps to put ostensible allies at each others' throats.