13-01-2011, 10:53 PM
The wrong date and time were in a NEWSPAPER article, which was obviously
faked. We had an intense exchange about this some time back, Morgan, and
I regard this case as one of the most blatant attempts to sweep evidence of
CIA complicity under the rug. The story Allan is weaving strikes me as nothing
more than a fairy tale. Believe what you want. To me, this is complete rubbish.
faked. We had an intense exchange about this some time back, Morgan, and
I regard this case as one of the most blatant attempts to sweep evidence of
CIA complicity under the rug. The story Allan is weaving strikes me as nothing
more than a fairy tale. Believe what you want. To me, this is complete rubbish.
Morgan Reynolds Wrote:Jim,
You write: How does Morgan propose to explain this phony "plaque"? What does it mean to him that SOMEONE was going to the time and trouble to fabricate a fake plaque?
Asked and answered, as the lawyers say, but I'll summarize here. The Adams family was proud of the newspaper pic yet got the day/date both wrong. Why is this such a "reach" (so implausible) for you? Why reject it out-of-hand? I do not understand your intensity in trashing this interpretation.
And why would Conein or the CIA be afraid of a pic in the crowd? Those guys were full of hubris. Do you think any of them were afraid of Garrison later? Or the media, which they played like a Wurlitzer?