Familiar Faces in Dealey Plaza

[Jack White]

This is much like the Altgens MAN IN THE DOORWAY issue, whether Oswald or Lovelady. If it was Lovelady, it is irrelevant. If it was Oswald it is important.

Thanks.

Jack

The Lovelady/LHO figure bothers me, Jack. A lot.

It's all about the shirt -- right down to the manner in which it is half-buttoned. Perhaps you can create a side-by-side of the figure on the steps and LHO wearing the half-buttoned shirt in which he was arrested.

In terms of the timing of the first open publication of the Lovelady/LHO Altgens image: Would there have been sufficient time to alter it to show the controversial figure?

In terms of the shirt itself: Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the official story have LHO changing his shirt when he got back to the rooming house?

You get what I'm driving at. Is my doppelganger/shirt hypothesis fatally flawed by matters related to timing?

Thanks,

Charles

Charles...thanks for your comments. You are correct about the shirt
being a key issue...it gave the WC tremendous trouble, more than
I can relate in a few sentences from memory. Did he change his
shirt, or did he not? Hamlet would say THAT IS THE QUESTION. It
not only affects the Altgens photo, but the testimony of various
witnesses and other evidence and photos. Years ago I did many
studies of the MAN IN THE DOORWAY issue, and will look to see
whether I still have any. Way back then I reached the conclusion
in Altgens 6 that I have reached regarding Altgens 4...confusing,
irrelevant and INCONCLUSIVE. Was this accidental or planned?

I noticed something just yesterday which set off alarm bells.
Reading Altgens testimony, I noted that he was asked what his
occupation was. Paraphrasing, he said I AM THE OPERATOR OF
THE WIRE PHOTO MACHINE AT THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS.
All these years we have been led to believe that Altgens was
an AP PHOTOGRAPHER! He operated a machine which sent and
received wirephotos! This makes me wonder JUST WHO WAS
IKE ALTGENS? Was he a plant for the occasion of November 22?
His testimony is equally confusing. It is a near certainty that
he did not shoot at least three of the photos attributed to him!
Most of the "Altgens photos" show various suspicious activities.
Did he take ANY photos that day? Or is he like another alleged
photographer, A.Zapruder? Was he a convenient asset to be
used to claim authorship of evidence? Even the double death
of Altgens and wife in bed from "carbon monoxide" is suspicious.

I presume most have read WILDERNESS OF MIRRORS or the works
of Prouty. Both stress the point that covertly planned operations
have BUILT-IN OBFUSCATION to simulate an amusement park maze
of mirrors, where the way out is only an illusion of reflections. Or
as the Apostle Paul said, WE SEE THROUGH A GLASS, DARKLY.

We have four suspicious photos, ALL ATTRIBUTED TO ALTGENS,
the operator of a wire photo machine. Did he take them? I think
not. Were they part of a carefully planned WILDERNESS OF MIRRORS?
I think so.

Jack