22-08-2011, 04:15 PM
To the degree that the Z-film alteration AND non-alteration hypotheses rely upon science for validation, then yes, the uncertainty continues.
Also, the blessing of "science" can be used to bestow the illusion of legitimacy upon wholly illegitimate conclusions. Take, as the prime example, NAA as it was used to "prove" the SBT.
Except NAA itself has been authoritatively debunked.
Which hasn't stopped the pseudo-scientists from continuing to trot it out.
It is one thing to discover the truth. It is quite another to spread it.
Also, the blessing of "science" can be used to bestow the illusion of legitimacy upon wholly illegitimate conclusions. Take, as the prime example, NAA as it was used to "prove" the SBT.
Except NAA itself has been authoritatively debunked.
Which hasn't stopped the pseudo-scientists from continuing to trot it out.
It is one thing to discover the truth. It is quite another to spread it.