Judyth Vary Baker: Living in Exile

[James H. Fetzer]

JUDYTH WRITES: SO WHO IS THIS "GLENN VIKLUND" AND WHAT IS HE DOING HERE? PART II

It seems Glenn is expensive, SO, AFTER GIVING HIS INFO....:

JOHN MCADAMS WROTE:



John McAdams
View profile
(2 users) More options Dec 20 2008, 4:20 am
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: John McAdams <john.mcad...@marquette.edu>
Date: 19 Dec 2008 22:20:24 -0500
Local: Sat, Dec 20 2008 4:20 am
Subject: Final Word From Glenn Viklund

Glenn Viklund has found the entire document trail representing Judyth's
campaign to get asylum from Swedish authorities. He's bowing out of
discussions here, but leaves the following as his conclusions.

He is a translator for the Swedish govt. at least at this date...so he is an
insider' who could read my files....and disclose private info from them....



მომხმარებელი
თემის ავტორი: Glenn Viklund
Svarta listan..
Glenn Viklund
ალბანეთი
Local time: 20:50
ინგლისური -> შვედური
+ ...
Feb 25, 2005

Även inom statsförvaltning pågår språklig förnyelse:

http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/243/a/19775

och "svarta listan".

Intressant, och bitvis, mycket rolig läsning!

Mvh

Glenn V.

'BLACK LIST" (SVARTA LISTAN) IS FOR PROFESSIONAL SWEDISH GOVERNMENT TRANSLATORS' INFORMATION:

Black List - words and phrases that can be replaced in the constitutional language (pdf 367 kb)

Download

Svarta listan - ord och fraser som kan ersättas i författningsspråk (pdf 367 kB) Black List - words and phrases that can be replaced in the constitutional language (pdf 367 kb)



Sammanfattning Abstract
Förord till tredje upplagan 2004 Preface to third edition 2004

Svarta listan har varit ett viktigt redskap i arbetet med att modernisera ord och fraser i författningarna alltsedan den gavs ut första gången 1988. Black list has been an important tool in efforts to modernize the words and phrases in constitutions since it was first awarded in 1988th

Ordlistan ges ut av rättschefen i Statsrådsberedningen och har utarbetats av språkexperterna på Justitiedepartementets granskningsenhet. The glossary is published by the right head of the Prime Minister's Office and has been developed by language experts in the Ministry of Justice's investigation unit. De nya uppslagsord och exempelfraser som finns i denna tredje upplaga har granskats av bl.a. The new entries and sample phrases contained in this third edition has been reviewed by, inter alia, rätts- och expeditionschefer i Regeringskansliet och riksdagens språkgrupp. justice and expedition leaders in the Cabinet Office and the Parliamentary language group. Orden och fraserna har även granskats av enhetschefer för de svenska översättarna och av svenska juristlingvister inom Europeiska unionen. The words and phrases have also been reviewed by the heads of the Swedish translators and the Swedish lawyer-linguists in the European Union

HE IS A PROFESSIONAL TRANSLATOR LIVING IN SWEDEN. TRANSLATORS IN SWEDEN OFTEN WORK, OF COURSE, FOR THE POLITICAL ASYLUM SERVICES.

SO HE WOULD KNOW PEOPLE THERE AND WOULD KNOW THE SYSTEM AND PEOPLE WELL ENOUGH TO GET QUESTIONS ANSWERED THAT MY FRIENDS COULD NOT.



Jun 24, 2001

Excellent news!

This is certainly another step in the right direction. Unfortunately, there are some people here that are using this instrument for other things but those intended.

Henry, related to this I have another question; One would assume that any professional translator with some degree of integrity does not peer grade (other) answers where he/she themselves have given an answer. But in the communities where I am residing, this is nevertheless a frequent scenario.

Is it just not possible to remove this option? In other words, if you have given an answer, you cannot peer grade other answers to that same question, or to remove existing peer grades that have been done by someone giving an answer?

I agree that it is a bit ridiculous that this should be an issue in the first place, but some people here at ProZ are behaving without any kind of professional integrity.

Best Regards

Glenn Viklund \"twiddle\"

HERE'S ANOTHER ONE, SHOWING HE KNOWS TECHNICAL TERMS AND SOUND ENGINEERING (JUST LIKE STEPHEN ROY --BLACKBURST):

CONTENT ONLY: GRAPHIC TOO LARGE

English term or phrase: flush-mounted
Swedish translation: infälld montering/infästning
Entered by: Glenn Viklund
Options:
- Contribute to this entry

12:38 Jun 19, 2002 Share link to this term[FAQ] Login or register (free) for more options.
English to Swedish translations [PRO]
Tech/Engineering - Petroleum Eng/Sci / gas
English term or phrase: flush-mounted
There are two standard types of fill boxes, a surface-mounted model or a flush-mounted model
Camilla Eckard

Local time: 13:42
infälld montering/infästning
Explanation:
found a site that explains the difference between 'surface' and 'flush'. Flush mounted means that it is attached in a specifically designed area (hole) so that it follows the surface. That could be called something like the above - 'infälld montering'

I know you are not allowed to call him a "___" on the Education Forum, [so I'm not quite sure how to describe him: as a sneaky guy?]

.......

He did post some stuff after coming after me...to establish, I believe his 'credibiity' -- And he will 'defend' himself by citing such rare and coincidental posts.

The posts are 'the mob did it' to distract from 'the government did it...'

It is the new direction that the desperate cover-up artists are using--anything to keep us form looking at the government.

Never trust this man, no matter what he claims about being a 'lurker'. He is a hired gun putting in these comments...after dissing me....

A typical 2008 post, which I believe was to cover up who he really is....

More options Jan 2 2009, 5:36 am
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: jbarge <anjba...@gmail.com>
Date: 1 Jan 2009 23:36:28 -0500
Local: Fri, Jan 2 2009 5:36 am
Subject: Re: 45 years later...

On Dec 30 2008, 7:48 pm, "Glenn Viklund"
<glenn54.vikl...@dataphone.se> wrote:

> What are the top 5 areas:
> - of why this is a lone nut case?
> - or, why there is a conspiracy?
> Judging b y the debate here and elsewhere it seems where still at square
> one?
> Best Regards, and a Happy New Year.
> Glenn Viklund, Sweden

I have followed this case for over 30 years.
It's fascinating.
Both sides have strengths and weaknesses; obviously they disagree
which ones tip the balance.
I "tilt" toward conspiracy, with reservations.
For the lone nut scenario, the autopsy evidence is sketchy - the skull
x-ray is particularly bad.
I like how there's allegations of a bullet wound at mid-shoulder blade
range, and the photo of the back....shows a ruler lying along the
spine (neatly blocking any view of an alleged bullet hole).
The autopsy doctors didn't map out the bullet passing through JFK'
neck/shoulder - apparently they didn't realize it was needed until too
late.
There's a lot more about the autopsy (the missing brain, the back
probe), which doesn't prove a conspiracy (what does?) but it taints
the evidence.
That rifle was a mess - it needed to be shimmed for the scope to work
properly.
I find it nearly impossible to believe that a bullet broke multiple
bones and ended up looking like CE 399.
I know that research has theoritically shown the single bullet theory
to be possible - true enough.
But even with "tumbling", cracking a wrist and a rib bone should still
mangle a piece of lead.
There's a few witnesses who saw 2 individuals on the sixth floor - but
eyewitnesses can always be mistaken, I suppose.
There's more (there's always more) but I have a very hard time
dismissing the Carlos Marcello - Ed Partin story.
Oswald got very little chance to say anything but the one thing he did
say loud and clear: "I'm a patsy".
New Orleans mob boss Marcello told Ed Partin in September, 1962 that
he would kill JFK and set up a "nut" to take the blame.
Nobody has been able to debunk that.
I find it awfully hard to shrug my shoulders and say, "coincidence"
with that threat.
Which brings up Jack Ruby - for me always the key element in
downplaying the CIA or anit-Castro angle.
If Ruby was (hypothetically) part of the conspiracy, it virtually
ensures the Mafia angle.
Why would the mafia pull the DRE or CIA irons out of the fire if they
did the shooting?
And only the mafia had the pull to make Jack Ruby kill Oswald (if Ruby
wasn't a second lone nut, of course).
I do think that Ruby could've easily worked with a crooked cop to make
it happen.
That's of course just my opinion.
And finally, motive.
Sure, LHO wanted to go down in history.
Yep, he probably was a fan of Castro, and none too happy about the
USA's treatment of Cuba.
But he was also only 24 years, with 2 children, one only a few weeks
old.
Killing JFK is a big thing to put on a young person's shoulders,
especially with virtually no chance of escaping the blame (i.e.
leaving the rifle behind).
I have studied LHO for decades now, trying to ascertain for myself if
he was capable of gunning down the President (and fleeing on public
transportation to boot).
I have a small voice in me that says, hold on.
There's no evidence of mental illness ( a la John Hinckly) or of
violence (aside from some unfortunate slapping of his wife).
But he's going to put his children through hell all to make a
political point?
What if we're all wrong here?
And please don't expect me to believe the Warren Commission was
"exhaustive".
That borders on silly.
On the flip side of conspiracy, I have issues as well.
The biggest puzzle in all of this is the actions of LHO.
How a devoutly political person could simply ignore a presidential
motorcade outside his place of work boggles the mind.
You think, if he hadn't had another angle up his sleeve, that he would
have strolled out and watched the motorcade at least!
The quick departure of a presidential murder scene indicates more than
a mere bystander curiousity.
("Hey they shot the President!" someone says. "Really? A day off, I
guess!" comes the reply.)
Of course, he could have been "under orders" (to not view the
motorcade) and after the shooting quickly sussed out that he was in
big trouble (and thus a patsy).
And that explains the dash to his boardingroom and grabbing his gun.
But the picture of him being just another unknowing random person
swept up by evil-doers doesn't fit.
The evidence that he was involved in the Tippit shooting is rather
convincing, to me at least.
Also the grassy knoll shot would have slammed JFK to the left into
Jackie, no?
Not to mention that a conspiracy would have to be very careful.
Who knows where the autopsy would have been performed?
Any loose ballistic evidence would have blown it wide open.
But something tells me Carlos Marcello was a very careful man.
Thank you for letting post.

THE ABOVE WAS POSTED IN DECEMBER,2008, AFTER RELATING ALL HE FOUND ON DEC, 15 ABOUT ME:


[quote name='Barb Junkkarinen' post='186562' date='Mar 11 2010, 11:42 PM'][quote name='James H. Fetzer' post='186556' date='Mar 11 2010, 09:35 PM']JUDYTH WRITES: SO WHO IS THIS "GLENN VIKLUND" AND WHAT IS HE DOING HERE? PART I[/quote]

Jim, have you tried explaining to Judyth that it is not allowed to questuin the motivation of another poster - and more? You, at least, know the rule, I am sure. So why do you keep posting this stuff, how many does this make now that essentially say/ask the same thing? What a waste of time! Call the migration dept, talk to someone there ... perhaps Anne Bergstrom, it has been pointed out ... a few times now ...her name was listed in the post. Ask her if the process Viklund reports he did to receive the information and public records is accurate. They probably even have a record of him being sent copies of the papers.

Now Judyth seems to be rather alleging that someone hired Viklund to find these documents. Please.

And Judyth .... here's another one you need to lose or prove .... I don't recall ever asserting anything about you being an illegal alien. And if you want direct quotes from Martin and Pam ...again ... about what that summons from the migration board was supposed to be (proof that you'd been granted asylum on appeal, according to Martin), I can post them again .... but it's all been said, it's all been quoted, why belabor this?

By the way, I have had emails from more than a couple of people asking me just who it is that is supposed to be pursuing you and wanting to do you harm. I had no answer for them as I don't recall you ever saying. And though I know Martin and you have been asked in the past for any police reports on the assorted accidents, muggings, break-ins and attacks, none were ever produced. Jim, that's the kind of documentation that could substantiate part of her claims, wouldn't you agree?

Barb :-)
[/quote]