03-04-2010, 12:54 AM
JUDYTH COMMENTS ON SOME OF JACK'S PHOTOS IN SUPPORT OF "TWO OSWALDS"
NOTE: By a nice coincidence, I have just received several posts from Judyth about photos
alleged to support the existence of "two Oswalds", Harvey and Lee. I also believe in "two
Oswalds", Robert and Lee, where my belief in "two Oswalds" seems to have stronger support.
Judyth has sent an email with a file, where there appears to be considerable overlap between
them. Instead of attempting to merge them, I am providing both for consideration. They offer
an illustration of why I regard Judyth as knowing more than the other contributors together.
![[Image: 4sfrzd.jpg]](http://i40.tinypic.com/4sfrzd.jpg)
We have what seems to be a plethora of bloated photos. When the "fat' photo of Lee was corrected by measuring the width of other photos taken in Dallas, we obtained a specific length from ear tip to ear tip compared to the length of the head. When corrected, it turned out that the 'bloated' photo was 9.5% distorted in width. The distortion was corrected to match other Dallas arrest photo with respect to head lengths and widths, plus double-checked with pupil-to-pupil measurements (obtained from the color arrest photo of Oswald), where the apparent differences tend to disappear.
We next learned that the "Lee" photo, when corrected for bloating as well, turned out to be Lee H. Oswald as shown in Dallas, due to ear distortion removed, and other feaures.
Next, we took a photo "from Russia" of a fat-faced Oswald that Mr. White submited. Surprisingly, this photo, when corrected the same head length and distance beween the pupils, matched ear-tip widths and other criteria precisely. The bloated "Russia" photo was distorted 8.6%. See attached.
We have now have experienced a parade of bloated photos that when corrected resemble Osewald more than they did when distorted. This was also the case with "Marguerite" photos.
This may have been the result of a faulty scanner or printing. Whatever the cause, efforts should have been made to check every photo for distance from pupil-to-pupil, distance from ear tip to ear tip, distance from edge of eye to edge of eye, etc. compared to length of head. It is our responsibility to be accurate and to follow some basic scientific principles.
The first step was to make sure all head lengths were the same,as well as head widths, etc., and could be set side-by-side with the same head-shot photos of Oswald in custody in Dallas which appeared immediately in newspapers. Comments such as the width of the bridge of the nose in a bloated photo are null and void. A bloated photo would widen the bridge of the nose.
There's more to come...
![[Image: 20r6zo2.jpg]](http://i44.tinypic.com/20r6zo2.jpg)
THE SHADOWS UNDER THE EYES ARE SIMPLY THE RESULT OF A STRONG OVERHEAD LIGHT SOURCE.
ON THE LEFT: THE ‘BLOATED’ OSWALD WAS CORRECTED TO 4.2 CM WIDE, WHICH THEN CORRESPONDS TO THE WIDTH EAR-TO-EAR OF OTHER ‘ARREST PHOTOS’ IN DALLAS.
TO THE LEFT IS THE PHOTO PROVIDED BY JACK WHITE. FOR SOME REASON, IT, TOO IS ‘BLOATED.’
THE ‘BLOATED’ USSR PHOTO WAS THEN CORRECTED TO CONFORM TO THE SAME WIDTH EAR-TO-EAR AS THE CORRECTED OSWALD ARREST PHOTO (CENTER). THE PHOTO OBAINED RESEMBLES OSWALD ENOUGH TO QUALIFY AS A POSSIBLE PHOTO OF OSWALD BECAUSE OSWALD’S FACIAL STRUCTURE WAS STILL MATURING WHEN THE “RUSSIAN” PHOTO WAS TAKEN.
1) OSWALD’S MUG PHOTO WAS CORRECTED TO PROPER DIMENSIONS (WHICH HAD SOMEHOW BEEN
BLOATED TO 9.5% WIDER THAN IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN).
2) SURPRISINGLY, THE PHOTO TO THE RIGHT AS SUPPLIED TO THE EDUCATION FORUM, WHEN CORRECTED TO THE SAME EAR WIDTH AND HEAD LENGTH, WAS DISTORTED 8.6%.
3) THE CORRECTED OSWALD PHOTO, CENTER, NOW RESEMBLES OSWALD MORE THAN THE BLOATED VERSION.
I HAVE NO EXPLANATION FOR WHY THESE PHOTOS ARE BLOATED, EXCEPT TO PROPOSE THAT A COPYING PROBLEM SOMEWHERE WAS INVOLVED. HOWEVER, ALL PHOTOS WHEN COMPARED TO ONE ANOTHER SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISPLAYED AT THE SAME HEAD LENGTH.
WHEN THIS IS DONE, WE THEN CORRECT TO THE KNOWN WIDTH FROM EAR TIP TO EAR TIP TO SEE IF THERE HAS BEEN ANY DISTORTION.
WHEN WE DO SO, WE ARE DISCOVERING, ON A REGULAR BASIS,THAT PHOTOS PROVIDED OF OSWALD BY MR. WHITE ARE DISTORTED. WHEN CORRECTED, WE HAVE PHOTOS THAT RESEMBLE OSWALD TO A GREATER EXTENT.
OSWALD’S FACE WAS IN THE PROCESS OF MATURING IN RUSSIA. IT IS EXPECTED THAT IT WOULD BE MORE ROUNDED THAN IN LATER PHOTOS. OSWALD ALSO LOST WEIGHT BETWEEN NEW ORLEANS PHOTOS AND PHOTOS IN DALLAS, MAKING HIS FACE LOOK LEANER IN THE PHOTO TO THE LEFT.
I CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR SO MUCH DOSTORTION IN THE PHOTOS PROVIDED. DID THE RUSSIANS DISTORT THESE PHOTOS DELIBERATELY, OR DID THE DISTORTION HAPPEN DURING COPYING?
WE NEED TO SEE THE EARLIES EXAMPLES AND THEIR PROVENANCE. WE NEED TO SEE ‘ORIGINALS’ AND SEE IF THE DISTORTION WAS IN THE ORIGINALS.
LEE SOMETIMES SMILED BY PULLING HIS UPPER LIP HIGHER. THE "RUSSIAN" PHOTO -– SMILING -- IS ENTIRELY CONSISTENT WITH A COUPLE OF PHOTOS SHOWING LEE WITH MARINA WHERE HE SMILES IN THE SAME WAY.
AS FOR SHADOWS, SHADOWS FROM A STRONG OVERHEAD LIGHT SOURCE CREATED SRTONG SHADOWS UNDER THE SKULL ORBITS AND UNDER THE NOSE, AS WELL AS ILLUMINATED MORE OF OSWALD’S CHIN THAN A SOFTER LIGHT SOURCE WOULD HAVE, THE SUBSEQUENT LIGHT-SPREAD CREATING THE IMPRESSION OF A FULLER JAWLINE.
JVB
NOTE: By a nice coincidence, I have just received several posts from Judyth about photos
alleged to support the existence of "two Oswalds", Harvey and Lee. I also believe in "two
Oswalds", Robert and Lee, where my belief in "two Oswalds" seems to have stronger support.
Judyth has sent an email with a file, where there appears to be considerable overlap between
them. Instead of attempting to merge them, I am providing both for consideration. They offer
an illustration of why I regard Judyth as knowing more than the other contributors together.
We have what seems to be a plethora of bloated photos. When the "fat' photo of Lee was corrected by measuring the width of other photos taken in Dallas, we obtained a specific length from ear tip to ear tip compared to the length of the head. When corrected, it turned out that the 'bloated' photo was 9.5% distorted in width. The distortion was corrected to match other Dallas arrest photo with respect to head lengths and widths, plus double-checked with pupil-to-pupil measurements (obtained from the color arrest photo of Oswald), where the apparent differences tend to disappear.
We next learned that the "Lee" photo, when corrected for bloating as well, turned out to be Lee H. Oswald as shown in Dallas, due to ear distortion removed, and other feaures.
Next, we took a photo "from Russia" of a fat-faced Oswald that Mr. White submited. Surprisingly, this photo, when corrected the same head length and distance beween the pupils, matched ear-tip widths and other criteria precisely. The bloated "Russia" photo was distorted 8.6%. See attached.
We have now have experienced a parade of bloated photos that when corrected resemble Osewald more than they did when distorted. This was also the case with "Marguerite" photos.
This may have been the result of a faulty scanner or printing. Whatever the cause, efforts should have been made to check every photo for distance from pupil-to-pupil, distance from ear tip to ear tip, distance from edge of eye to edge of eye, etc. compared to length of head. It is our responsibility to be accurate and to follow some basic scientific principles.
The first step was to make sure all head lengths were the same,as well as head widths, etc., and could be set side-by-side with the same head-shot photos of Oswald in custody in Dallas which appeared immediately in newspapers. Comments such as the width of the bridge of the nose in a bloated photo are null and void. A bloated photo would widen the bridge of the nose.
There's more to come...
THE SHADOWS UNDER THE EYES ARE SIMPLY THE RESULT OF A STRONG OVERHEAD LIGHT SOURCE.
ON THE LEFT: THE ‘BLOATED’ OSWALD WAS CORRECTED TO 4.2 CM WIDE, WHICH THEN CORRESPONDS TO THE WIDTH EAR-TO-EAR OF OTHER ‘ARREST PHOTOS’ IN DALLAS.
TO THE LEFT IS THE PHOTO PROVIDED BY JACK WHITE. FOR SOME REASON, IT, TOO IS ‘BLOATED.’
THE ‘BLOATED’ USSR PHOTO WAS THEN CORRECTED TO CONFORM TO THE SAME WIDTH EAR-TO-EAR AS THE CORRECTED OSWALD ARREST PHOTO (CENTER). THE PHOTO OBAINED RESEMBLES OSWALD ENOUGH TO QUALIFY AS A POSSIBLE PHOTO OF OSWALD BECAUSE OSWALD’S FACIAL STRUCTURE WAS STILL MATURING WHEN THE “RUSSIAN” PHOTO WAS TAKEN.
1) OSWALD’S MUG PHOTO WAS CORRECTED TO PROPER DIMENSIONS (WHICH HAD SOMEHOW BEEN
BLOATED TO 9.5% WIDER THAN IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN).
2) SURPRISINGLY, THE PHOTO TO THE RIGHT AS SUPPLIED TO THE EDUCATION FORUM, WHEN CORRECTED TO THE SAME EAR WIDTH AND HEAD LENGTH, WAS DISTORTED 8.6%.
3) THE CORRECTED OSWALD PHOTO, CENTER, NOW RESEMBLES OSWALD MORE THAN THE BLOATED VERSION.
I HAVE NO EXPLANATION FOR WHY THESE PHOTOS ARE BLOATED, EXCEPT TO PROPOSE THAT A COPYING PROBLEM SOMEWHERE WAS INVOLVED. HOWEVER, ALL PHOTOS WHEN COMPARED TO ONE ANOTHER SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISPLAYED AT THE SAME HEAD LENGTH.
WHEN THIS IS DONE, WE THEN CORRECT TO THE KNOWN WIDTH FROM EAR TIP TO EAR TIP TO SEE IF THERE HAS BEEN ANY DISTORTION.
WHEN WE DO SO, WE ARE DISCOVERING, ON A REGULAR BASIS,THAT PHOTOS PROVIDED OF OSWALD BY MR. WHITE ARE DISTORTED. WHEN CORRECTED, WE HAVE PHOTOS THAT RESEMBLE OSWALD TO A GREATER EXTENT.
OSWALD’S FACE WAS IN THE PROCESS OF MATURING IN RUSSIA. IT IS EXPECTED THAT IT WOULD BE MORE ROUNDED THAN IN LATER PHOTOS. OSWALD ALSO LOST WEIGHT BETWEEN NEW ORLEANS PHOTOS AND PHOTOS IN DALLAS, MAKING HIS FACE LOOK LEANER IN THE PHOTO TO THE LEFT.
I CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR SO MUCH DOSTORTION IN THE PHOTOS PROVIDED. DID THE RUSSIANS DISTORT THESE PHOTOS DELIBERATELY, OR DID THE DISTORTION HAPPEN DURING COPYING?
WE NEED TO SEE THE EARLIES EXAMPLES AND THEIR PROVENANCE. WE NEED TO SEE ‘ORIGINALS’ AND SEE IF THE DISTORTION WAS IN THE ORIGINALS.
LEE SOMETIMES SMILED BY PULLING HIS UPPER LIP HIGHER. THE "RUSSIAN" PHOTO -– SMILING -- IS ENTIRELY CONSISTENT WITH A COUPLE OF PHOTOS SHOWING LEE WITH MARINA WHERE HE SMILES IN THE SAME WAY.
AS FOR SHADOWS, SHADOWS FROM A STRONG OVERHEAD LIGHT SOURCE CREATED SRTONG SHADOWS UNDER THE SKULL ORBITS AND UNDER THE NOSE, AS WELL AS ILLUMINATED MORE OF OSWALD’S CHIN THAN A SOFTER LIGHT SOURCE WOULD HAVE, THE SUBSEQUENT LIGHT-SPREAD CREATING THE IMPRESSION OF A FULLER JAWLINE.
JVB