Big Tobacco's Conspiracy To Hide Health Risks & Deceive, They Knew & Documents Show They Knew - Here

[Carol Thompson]

All,

This is a classic iteration -- laughable if it weren't so tragic -- of all that I referenced in the above-quoted section.

I'm convinced. "Thompson" is "Colby." Even the "cite examples" language is lifted verbatim from dozens upon dozens of "Colby" posts.

"Cite examples," to reiterate, is in service to the need to engage, engage, engage. All the enemy wants is to prolong the long-settled arguments. Such is the brief of "Colby" and "Thompson."

It is clear to me that one or more of the individuals posting as "Colby" is/are at it here. Let's let it go a bit longer so as to draw them out. Then let's enjoy their "The DPF doesn't allow dissent" posts on the Ef.

I guess that if you have all the material resources in the world, you can afford to employ idiots.

"Thompson," you are exposed.

Charles

This argument is not "long-settled," because in science, unlike ideological dogmas, arguments are opened by new evidence. You clearly believe that censorship, stonewalling, and evasion are legitimate scientific arguments, which they are not.

And to pretend that merely saying "cite examples" is proof that I'm someone I never heard of called Colby is clinical paranoia. There are more than 385,000 Google hits on the phrase "cite examples." And you think they're all "Colby," and they're all out to get you!