19-10-2016, 09:01 AM
An additional point for completeness in the Todd&Clare case: In their statement https://www.toddandclare.com/datinglife/...wikileaks/ they claim
In light of the other inconsistencies and the story of them contacting Assange before, it is clear that this company is a bogus tool used to discredit Assange and that every claim they make should be regarded as junk.
Quote:Like big companies, including Nestle and steel giant, Tata, who have been thrown out of the same UN program in the past, according to the UN's delisting fact sheet,Checking this fact shows that it is completely bogus, Nestle SA, the mother company is a member in good standing, as is Tata Steel, both since 2001. Some regional subcompanies have changed their membership status, but the main companies did not.
In light of the other inconsistencies and the story of them contacting Assange before, it is clear that this company is a bogus tool used to discredit Assange and that every claim they make should be regarded as junk.
The most relevant literature regarding what happened since September 11, 2001 is George Orwell's "1984".