Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall?
The following report is translated by the wonderful GoogleTranslate from Dutch in the newspaper De Telegraaf:

Quote:Mon 24 Mar 2014, 15:18|
read on

'Turkey blackmailed justitietop with Demmink'

UTRECHT -In exchange for a Dutch condemnation of the Kurd Baybasin with false evidence, Turkey maintains information about the abuse of minors by former top official Joris Demmink for themselves. Thus Turkey blackmailed the Dutch justitietop. Of this former policeman Klaas Langedoen convinced he declared Monday as a witness before the court in Utrecht.




[Image: demmink.jpg]
Photo: Serge Ligtenberg



Utrecht is heard at the request of the foundation Rusty Nail. A series of witnesses Which examines the assumption that boys abuse by the then chief executive of justice Demmink active in the cover-up has stopped.
Former chief of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Langedoen bases his conclusion on his own research in Turkey. He did research at the request of the lawyer for two Turkish victims who say they were abused by Demmink. Doing long said the two boys. They told how they were abused by Demmink and pointed him in a book of Langendoen.
Other hints for his conclusion was Langedoen a Turkish journalist. Which showed a video interview with a driver who had to recruit boys for Demmink. He also issued a report showing the blackmail deal between Turkish Prime Minister Tansu Çiller former and the then Minister of Justice Winnie Sorgdrager would turn out.
According Langedoen former brothel guys can confirm how "the system" worked out the Rolodex study, in which high-ranking pedophiles guys could exploit.
Demminks lawyers took that perfectly correct. Langendoens the reliability of researchHe is paid by the law firm of Baybasin, which collects ammo for a review of his life sentence. It is also the law firm of the Turkish victims.
Doing long agreed that he had not applied. Guidelines for photo identifications But detectives who do, are conspicuous by their absence in studies of the coverup.



This next article is from Waar in Holland

Quote:Noose around neck Joris Demmink pulls tighter, Baybasin affair

December 21, 2013 Posted in Accountancy , News Programs , AIVD , Embassies , Corruption , European politics , international politics ,Internet , Journalism , Justice , Child Abuse , Newspapers , National politics , media , Perjury , Ministries , Narcotics , Prosecution ,Government , Pedophilia , Politics , Judiciary , cheat , Aliens by: Pierre Waayer

[Image: Baybasin.jpg]
The case Baybasin: a Dutch Dreyfus Affair
France, late 19th century. The country is deeply divided by a fierce public debate about a possible miscarriage of justice with antisemitic draw. A Jewish army officer, Captain Dreyfus, in 1894 accused of providing military intelligence to archenemy of Germany. If any evidence emerges a letter that would be written. By Dreyfus

A handwriting expert refuses to confirm that the letter was written by Dreyfus. Other experts consulted later explaining it. The opinion of the first expert is pushed aside. Dreyfus is convicted and exiled to Devil's Island off the coast of French Guiana. About the Dreyfus Affair was written much. There is also a long chapter devoted to the classic " On straddling two centuries "by Jan Romein. It is, in flowery fifties Dutch, especially the socio-political context of this case, sharp highlights (from page 115).
The case Baybasin.
Over a hundred years later in the Netherlands plays a similar case: the trial of the Kurd Hüseyin Baybasin.On the site of the Foundation, we Bakker Schut posts since 2011 on the disputed life sentence of Baybasin and have the charges against the former Secretary General of Justice Demmink, because of corruption of minors. The case Demmink gets the most attention lately. The case Baybasin begins to run in the background, but thus is at least as interesting and moreover still very topical. It is an extremely complicated matter, with a comprehensive dossier. Baybasin got life imprisonment include ordering murder. He has always vehemently denied. There are persistent doubts about the evidence. After his final conviction in 2002, many new facts have emerged. So there are statements by Turkish police and judicial employees Turkey Netherlands has put under pressure in this case and that the wiretaps with evidence largely from Turkey are delivered. Furthermore, it has become clear that those who Baybasin would have given the kill order in Turkey previously never been convicted. One was acquitted and the other was never even prosecuted. In other words, Baybasin had received a life sentence for ordering the murder of someone who was acquitted. Himself for murder The case Baybasin now lies with the Supreme Court with a request for review. Since April 2011 Since January 2013 there are again witnesses heard.
On www.bs-foundation.nl the facts and the documents available and the opinion thereon of the Bakker Schut Foundation. Striking is the reluctance of the judiciary to seriously pay attention to (new) exculpatory evidence, at least until now.
The charges and trial
Hüseyin Baybasin worked in the eighties for the then Turkish government and was very close witness to the involvement of senior Turkish government officials in heroin smuggling. He later became active in politics as a Kurd, was persecuted and tortured. He fled Turkey and managed to get where he applied for political asylum. Finally to Netherlands When Turkey in 1995, asked for his extradition, which was rightly prevented by the Dutch courts. Baybasin had indeed feared for his life in Turkey. He was co-founder of the Kurdish parliament in exile and worked with PKK leader Öcalan, but was politically much more moderate. He still is.He does not want separation from Turkey, but only greater autonomy for the Kurds, in the state of Turkey.
In close cooperation with the Turkish judiciary Baybasin was arrested on suspicion of heroin trafficking in the Netherlands in 1998 and give the phone ordering assassinations abroad, one in a tea garden in Istanbul (was there in 1997, the Marxist Kurd OGE murdered) and one in Kentucky (USA). This second murder has also never happened. Relevant evidence consisted almost exclusively of wiretaps. Baybasin has from the beginning stated that the calls were not made by him and that this must be manipulated conversations, partly supplied to the Netherlands from Turkey. Irregularities time were already highlighted in the pictures, but the Dutch Forensic Institute, that the tapes had assessed by ear only felt that they were authentic, conversations in previous months were conducted from the Netherlands and were recorded in the Netherlands . Baybasin was sentenced to twenty years in prison in 2001.
On appeal Baybasins new lawyers (Herman Pieter Bakker Schut and Adele van der Plas) emphasized potential influence and blackmail of the Dutch justice by Turkey. The taps were, they obviously manipulated and partly from Turkey. That alone was clear from the content of the calls. An extremely critical technical countercheck the recordings by three independent experts was inserted. But their report, nothing was done, it was taken for granted. The experts were not heard. For an explanation, see the still shocking TV broadcast Zemlya in 2003, part 2 and 3. The signal abnormalities are clearly there, even for non-experts. The response from the responsible prosecutor Stein of the National Prosecutor's laconic: an expert's report, we find enough.
In five months, 6,000 phone calls were tapped, an incredibly high number of: an estimated daily average of 40 calls, seven days a week. The tapverslagen which two of the six allegations were based were not found on the original data carriers ( revision request , paragraph 108, page 83, par. 119 and 120, page 91). There were numerous translation errors made by the Turkish interpreter and translation errors by the Dutch investigators. An expert witness called specialist in Kurdish doubted the word tea garden tea garden in a telephone interview about the murder in Istanbul. According to him, the word was mistranslated and conscious conversation was not about a tea garden, but a bundle of clothes that refugees carry with them. In a telephone conversation on the Kentucky Case phrase "make him call" was described by the Dutch investigators as "make him cold." "Make him cold", as it says in the Dutch police report.
The appeal
In 2002, the Court of Den Bosch even increased the sentence to life imprisonment, with no prejudice was delivered. Any additional evidence The evidence was almost exclusively based on the wiretaps and the first expert report. Baybasin was leader of an unprecedented criminal organization, and he had given orders to murder. This was deemed conclusively proven.
But who takes the trouble to study the documents seriously quickly falls from one surprise to another. It is in the first place a sloppy judgment. That was at least the commission Buruma, Access Closed Criminal Cases Review Commission (TCEAS), who in 2011 wrote a report on the reliability of the straps. Law professor Y. Buruma was chairman and spokesman of the committee. Shortly after publication of the report, he himself became a member of the Supreme Court. The Buruma committee asks cynically wonder why one in 2002 settled for uncontrolled evidence in the case of the tea garden murder: "The TCEAS has considered the question of how can be explained that the Dutch police and the courts apparently have not obtained more evidence from Turkey. "And:" ... it seems an obvious interest in to offer. firmly as possible evidence to the court a murder case in which the involvement of the accused is not directly The TCEAS has also surprised that relatively simple investigations have been neglected. "( TCEAS report , p.19).
Indeed, what evidence there was actually the premise that Baybasin was a drug trafficker? That was not there. There were only accusations from Turkey, which were verified insufficient. And how sure it was in 2002 that Turkey arrested "perpetrators" murder really had committed? One of them was never considered a suspect, the other (Yavuztürk) was not tried in 2004. And then acquitted. The Dutch prosecutor had requested several documents in Turkey about the murder, but did not take the minutes of the interrogation of Yavaztürk in 1998 in the file. It is a statement that is highly exculpatory for Baybasin. But that was not submitted to the Court. See the review request , paragraph 97, p. 73 and 74).
Lifelong
And then the punishment. Which is at least remarkable, even for those who still may have the complete innocence of Baybasin doubts. Lifelong is generally given for committing heinous murders, with hard evidence. In comparison, Mohammed Bouyeri, the murderer of Theo van Gogh, was sentenced to life. Lucia de Berk was sentenced to life for the murder of several hospital patients, but was acquitted in revision. Ernest L. got into the still controversial Deventer murder case (DNA traces and mobile telephone traffic as proof) for twelve years. And Holleeder was in 2007, nine years of threats, because commission could be incomplete. Proven to murder
Lifetime in the Netherlands means real life. There is not a part as long as all other penalties and grace is never actually granted. The offender, the situation is completely hopeless. According to the European Court in Strasbourg, this is contrary to the prohibition of torture under the European Convention on Human Rights.This year it was repeated position . Baybasin would have been if he had not been given a life free for three years now but the second highest penalty, then 20 years old. In 2012 (he had then been detained for 14 years) did Baybasin pending revision by the Supreme Court still a pardon, especially based on the fact that it was not known to the judges during his sentencing that the two alleged perpetrators of the OGE murder in Turkey were acquitted, or not prosecuted. The request for clemency was rejected. According to the opinion of the Court, Den Bosch Baybasin was still such a great danger to society that he was never to return. InMoreover, the case was "characterized by a high degree of sensitivity" by the accusations Baybasin made ​​to the "Turkish and Dutch State and officials of both states." A notable addition. Can a convicted to life who considers himself innocent sometimes not everything in our power to prove his innocence? Or is Baybasin especially dangerous because he accuses Dutch judges and judicial officials?
Prison Regime
A surprising high penalties. At least as strange is how Baybasin was treated during his detention. For unexplained reasons, he has never been placed in incommunicado detention during the preliminary investigation. He spent nearly six years partly in isolation in the EBI in Vught. Many would not survive mentally and physically. He calls his stay in the EBI worse than the torture he underwent in Turkey. His lawyers had to litigate to come. Behind the motives of these additional restraint It would go to declarations of attempted escape. That proved nowhere to rest, there was no reason for the isolation. After he was transferred to a regular prison in late 2003, this special treatment went on. So he was in 2005 and in 2007 again placed in isolation. Again, totally unfounded. Baybasin won a total of three lawsuits over wrongful insulation. Advocate Judith Serrarens began in 2013, an Article 12 procedure to the prison director S. Langelaar to prosecute. Serrarens believes that Secretary General Demmink ordered the insulation. She says that having Demmink the detention file Baybasin has requested and had in his possession. Half a year of hard evidence June 2013 the case was first treated in The Hague . The process is not yet completed.
Was in 2012, just before the hearing of the application for review with the Supreme Court, searched sudden Baybasins cell, his painter's tools were taken from him and all the legal documents were taken away from him. He was later returned, except the documents relating to the Demmink case. Also, this is never explained. There in 2011 also failed to respond to troubling medical symptoms. Again, it was the intervention of his lawyer.
Baybasin is obviously additional punished because he insist on his innocence and his reading of the story: he was tricked by Turkey and the Netherlands had to make up for the trolley of the Turks
Facts
It is striking that all matters which hitherto have surfaced exculpatory for Baybasin (see fact sheet ). There is no new incriminating fact came to light about Baybasins involvement in drug trafficking or statements in the criminal world. A number of allegations in the original criminal case have now been disproved or made implausible.
What then of evidence about? Nothing except the dubious wiretaps . There is no further evidence of participation in a criminal organization. The argument in the tea garden case is undermined by the impunity of the two alleged perpetrators. The Dutch Justice based its evidence at that time entirely on the assumption that these two men would have committed the murder. And the award for life could only be given on the basis of the order to murder.
In addition to the technical errors in the taps, there are many other absurdities. An Israeli general, as a witness in 2007 by the State Council, recognizes his own voice on the tapes, but emphatically states that the content of the conversation, and nothing beats that must be. Therefore interfered in the conversation He spoke often with Baybasin indeed, but that was only on political issues. A Turkish-Dutch police interpreter translated the tapped phone calls from Turkish and Kurdish. This interpretation appears to have had with the Turkish Justice and Turkish security forces. Close ties During a witness in January 2013, he tells for the first time how he collaborated with the Turkish government and Turkey was how to get it situated. rid of BaybasinBaybasin was on a death list of eleven influential Kurds, of which there are now only two are alive.
Public discussion, the fearful reaction of the established order
Back to the Dreyfus Affair. If there is any evidence of dubious handwritten letter, but Dreyfus is still condemned and banished.
The writer Emile Zola gets involved and wrote in 1898 on the front page of the literary newspaper L'Aurorefamous letter J'accuse , addressed to the French president, in which he involved all politicians, judges and senior army officers by name accuses complicity in a cover-up around a grave miscarriage of justice. Zola is subsequently indicted and convicted. He needs to move to England to avoid arrest. There is a massive international protest started, with demonstrations including London, Washington and Budapest. Lose the incumbent government parties in the 1898 elections. Mainly under pressure from abroad, the case in 1899 and revised the sentence changed to 10 years. Shortly after being pardoned and he is released. But he will not be final acquitted in 1906.
The real spy and author of the letter, Major Ferdinand Esterhazy was in 1897 by a whistleblower accused, but was acquitted. The courageous whistleblower was the head of military intelligence, George Picquart .Picquart was also initially blamed himself and fired, but completely rehabilitated after Dreyfus Process.Eventually he became minister of war.
Emile Zola dies in 1902 in his sleep by carbon monoxide poisoning. Intent, so says the suspect, but it can not be substantiated. Years later declares a Parisian chimney with far-right anti-Semitic sympathies, that one night he had with others closed. chimney Zola's apartment with grime and grit
Jan Romein analyzes the Dreyfus Affair in great detail and concludes that the cause of all this judicial failure should be fearful when responding to the established order sought: the importance and reputation of the army and the judiciary were above all. Therefore, the miscarriage of justice had to be covered up by all means. Only when a brave known intellectual stepped in, there was slow movement in the case, under the pressure of international public opinion.
The parallels with the Baybasinproces are clear. Then there was a graphological "evidence" and ignored the opinion of a handwriting expert, now there are almost garish manipulated wiretaps, which according to several witnesses provided by Turkey, which still had a bone to pick with Baybasin. A second opinion is pushed aside. There are telephone signals that are not right. There is confusion about the words used. The Turkish-Dutch police interpreter worked with Turkey. Access committee of the Committee on Evaluation of Closed Cases (TCEAS) find technical irregularities, but dares not recommended to review the matter . The remarkably high penalty appeal is incomprehensible. The reason for the many years of extremely traumatizing incommunicado detention in the EBI is unclear. And the endless slow judicial process, particularly in recent years with the TCEAS and the revision request is unusual. It all points to the same "anxious to respond to the established order" as in the Dreyfus Affair. Credibility and authority of the Dutch legal system are under discussion.
In the Dreyfus Affair was a leading role for the press. The case was very extensive for years closely followed by the press and led to a broad and intense national and international debate. In that area, there is so far no parallel with the Baybasin case. Only the Catholic Newspaper publishes fearless about Baybasin and Demmink. Other media (major newspapers, radio and TV) silence. Do not dare they Too few newsworthy? If Baybasin indeed fallen into the trap under pressure from Turkey, the Netherlands and therefore harmless to life is condemned, that might be the biggest Dutch miscarriage of justice ever be. A Dutch Dreyfus Affair.
* Kees van der Plas is a former GP and member of the Bakker Schut Foundation.
Source: bs-foundation.nl. December 20, 2013

Both stories were lifted from Aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The Power of the Paedos - another high profile case hits the 'never happened' wall? - by David Guyatt - 25-03-2014, 11:32 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Australian Sally Ann rented out hostel children to paedos David Guyatt 2 5,829 04-02-2014, 04:52 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Global Horizons Indicted for Human Trafficking: Largest Case in US History Ed Jewett 1 5,957 03-08-2012, 04:30 PM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  Justice for slavers (esp sex traffickers): hang them high! Ed Jewett 0 3,000 20-08-2010, 05:08 AM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  Robert Green arrested and taken to court in Scottish Paedo case Susan Grant 1 3,768 19-02-2010, 06:07 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)