27-06-2015, 10:03 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:The report says "since his return from Russia", missing the fact that the events in question were all while Oswald was still in Russia.
It's just a guess, but my bet is the Village Voice editors by 12/5/63 knew the basics of the unfolding biography of Classic Oswald, or at least knew the dates when he was abroad. Hearing all those "snowballing" stories of Oswald in NYC, they must have assumed they actually dated from after June 13, '62, after Harvey came back to the U.S. Otherwise, they'd have to assume Two Oswalds, eh?
Quote:Armstrong's challengers remain uncredibly mute on this.
Could Landesberg have said I wish I never got involved with Oswald because Oswald explained to him who he actually was and Landesberg knew the difference between Harvey & Lee? Could Landesberg have known he was working with the real Lee Harvey Oswald?
Another guess, but my bet is that most of this stuff is on a need-to-know basis, and I can't think of much need for him to know.
HarveyandLee.net
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996