01-07-2015, 01:43 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-07-2015, 02:18 AM by Jim Hargrove.)
Drew Phipps Wrote:If Fowler was a CIA plant to discredit Garrison or just keep tabs on his investigation, and the double story originates with him, don't you at least have to consider the possibility that the "doubles" story was CIA-designed to be a straw man for Garrison to take a swing at and then be discredited?
Considering the trainload of evidence that has emerged over the years for two Oswalds, that would seem to be a dangerous play, even for an outfit with full knowledge of what Garrison was up against. Boxley/Wood, at least ostensibly, was let go by the Agency a decade before the Garrison investigation.
Edit: Also, Garrison was at the same round-table discussion where Boxley talked about the two Oswalds, and there is no indication in the transcript that he made any objection.
HarveyandLee.net
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996