01-07-2015, 03:43 PM
That's quite fascinating.....Garrison was on to so very many essential things....that is why they 'shut him down' - along with his Shaw Trial [and much of the way that was done is now exposed in documents]. Truth is perhaps the MOST dangerous commodity around - and many have died or had their lives ruined for trying to get it out on important subjects. Hard Truths also attract a lot of trolls on internet forums - from the denier types that just can't go 'there' [where there is their own country doing evil things], to those who work with/for those who keep the evil untruths promulgated by challenging those who'd dare to question 'received history' of political events - more specifically Deep Political events, especially false-flag Deep Political events!
I think that is why JA and his basic premise get so much flack. If he really were 'off the deep end' and in 'looney-tunes land' he'd not even be noticed, much less attacked as he is, and his well-documented and researched theory is. Even if one doesn't subscribe to the basic premise, one really has a lot of head scratching and thinking outside the 'propaganda box' to explain away all the anomalies and impossibilities. For me, his theory best explains the observed events and documentation now available. For the provocateurs any doubt will do - and they throw it with wild abandon hoping to make others doubt too. I only suggest any honest explorer of the case will read JA's book or look at his website [or this thread] and judge for yourself....were you told the truth about 'Oswald' by the 'authorities'...or were you lied to and misled every step of the way?! :
:
I think that is why JA and his basic premise get so much flack. If he really were 'off the deep end' and in 'looney-tunes land' he'd not even be noticed, much less attacked as he is, and his well-documented and researched theory is. Even if one doesn't subscribe to the basic premise, one really has a lot of head scratching and thinking outside the 'propaganda box' to explain away all the anomalies and impossibilities. For me, his theory best explains the observed events and documentation now available. For the provocateurs any doubt will do - and they throw it with wild abandon hoping to make others doubt too. I only suggest any honest explorer of the case will read JA's book or look at his website [or this thread] and judge for yourself....were you told the truth about 'Oswald' by the 'authorities'...or were you lied to and misled every step of the way?! :
:
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass