10-09-2015, 04:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-09-2015, 06:43 PM by Albert Doyle.)
It's been pretty clear for a while now that Parker, Laverick, and Parnell are basically denial trolls naysaying the evidence they keep ignoring. They go right to trolling in order to divert from the fact they haven't adequately answered the evidence.
Parker ignores the fact that the Oswald double seen at the Texas Theater could not have been Crafard therefore vastly increasing the likelihood that the double Ralph Yates saw was also this same person.
Armstrong's interpretation makes sense and fits the facts. Parker's trolling doesn't.
Something tells me Armstrong is safe from those assholes.
I also see Jim Hargrove has hinted that he believes my theory that Baker saw one Oswald in the lunch room and another on the 4th floor landing.
.
Parker ignores the fact that the Oswald double seen at the Texas Theater could not have been Crafard therefore vastly increasing the likelihood that the double Ralph Yates saw was also this same person.
Armstrong's interpretation makes sense and fits the facts. Parker's trolling doesn't.
Something tells me Armstrong is safe from those assholes.
I also see Jim Hargrove has hinted that he believes my theory that Baker saw one Oswald in the lunch room and another on the 4th floor landing.
.