10-09-2015, 10:13 PM
As I've written before... whoever this was, was many seconds of travel closer to the sniper's next than Oswald in the lunchroom on the 2nd floor
Baker's description is the standard one: 30 years old, 5'9", 165 pounds, dark hair and wearing a light brown jacket
If Baker and Truly encountered this person as this first day affidavit suggests - this must have been Oswald...
Why not say so and put him that much closer to the Sniper's area?
Was there a conflict with someone else who sees Oswald in the lunchroom at the same time? Not that I remember... no on ecorroborates the lunchroom story.
Mr. BELIN. Do you remember whether he had any shirt or jacket on over his T-shirt?
Mrs. REID. He did not. He did not have any jacket on.
Mr. BELIN. Have you ever seen anyone working at the book depository wearing any kind of a shirt or jacket similar to Commission Exhibit 150 or do you know?
Mrs. REID. No; I do not. I have never, so far as I know ever seen that shirt.
The first person to see either the lunchroom man or the stairs man is Mrs. Reid.
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/j..._0119b.htm is the diagram where she makes marks to describe what happened.
There are those who claim to have heard Oswald at the 1st floor back stairs and yet we know this T-shirted Oswald left via the front door.
Did this Oswald shed the "light brown jacket" which his button-down Briarloom shirt most definitely was not.
Was it actually a bad (or provided) description of Oswald on the stairs?
The the WC went out of its way to NOT ask Baker or Truly about what was written in the affidavit exemplifies the WC's desire to learn the truth.
Could they already have know who that might have been so as to stay away from the affidavit during questioning?
They MUST have know it conflicted with the testimony they were now hearing...
Who decided that Baker's affidavit was not to be used?
Baker's description is the standard one: 30 years old, 5'9", 165 pounds, dark hair and wearing a light brown jacket
If Baker and Truly encountered this person as this first day affidavit suggests - this must have been Oswald...
Why not say so and put him that much closer to the Sniper's area?
Was there a conflict with someone else who sees Oswald in the lunchroom at the same time? Not that I remember... no on ecorroborates the lunchroom story.
Mr. BELIN. Do you remember whether he had any shirt or jacket on over his T-shirt?
Mrs. REID. He did not. He did not have any jacket on.
Mr. BELIN. Have you ever seen anyone working at the book depository wearing any kind of a shirt or jacket similar to Commission Exhibit 150 or do you know?
Mrs. REID. No; I do not. I have never, so far as I know ever seen that shirt.
The first person to see either the lunchroom man or the stairs man is Mrs. Reid.
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/j..._0119b.htm is the diagram where she makes marks to describe what happened.
There are those who claim to have heard Oswald at the 1st floor back stairs and yet we know this T-shirted Oswald left via the front door.
Did this Oswald shed the "light brown jacket" which his button-down Briarloom shirt most definitely was not.
Was it actually a bad (or provided) description of Oswald on the stairs?
The the WC went out of its way to NOT ask Baker or Truly about what was written in the affidavit exemplifies the WC's desire to learn the truth.
Could they already have know who that might have been so as to stay away from the affidavit during questioning?
They MUST have know it conflicted with the testimony they were now hearing...
Who decided that Baker's affidavit was not to be used?
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter