Anyone want to discuss HARVEY & LEE?

[R.K. Locke]

Here's to another 51 years of acrimony, vituperation and monomaniacal fixation on divisive, relatively inconsequential issues.

And to comments like that one about one of the most important aspects of the cover-up

- the duality of a man working for the FBI/CIA/MIA/ONI being sent to Russia, marrying a KGB prostitute and bringing her to the USA, working both sides of the Cuban issue, virtually living within intelligence circles bent on disobeying presidential foreign policy, being incriminated for having been paid by Castro to carry out the assassination and then ultimately being framed for the assassination of a president -

and the reasons behind these important subjects being relegated to the status of "inconsequential" via unnecessarily multi-syllabic verbiage....


The ramifications of H&L's revelations are quite astonishing... that the US intelligence community was so hell-bent on acquiring Russian intel and thwarting anything remotely threatening under the guise of "communism" that they would emply tactics created and honed by generations of German, Russian, and SE Asian practice.

This pervasive "couldn't happen in the good ole US of A" attitude precludes intelligent people from traveling down obvious paths simply due to incredulity rather than let the evidnece and research take them where it leads.

Instead, let's ask the question,

"What benefit to the US intelligence community would handfuls of "assets" with histories not related to them and others creating a history using their identity?"


Reading books like Larry Hancock's Nexus http://www.amazon.com/Nexus-Political-As...ry+hancock, or
The Wilderness of Mirrors http://www.amazon.com/Wilderness-Mirrors...1585748242 along with Bill Simpich's State Secret allows us to get a glimpse of the evil and depravity involved.

That this topic and the conclusion of the evidence available is pushed aside as either too complicated or too far-fetched is a cop out. In front of hundreds of people and mutiple still/motion picture cameras the EVIDENCE was able to "almost" completely remove the head shot from the front to JFK from history. "almost" completely remove the frontal throat shot, "almost" convince us of the Silly Bullet Theory... this was done right in front of our eyes by the manipulation of the Evidence...

yet hiding two men into one history is "too complicated" or "far-fetched" within the mountains of documents ??

"relatively inconsequential issues" ? is simply a back-handed way to demean the work and unless these rebuttals are proven, or at least attempted to be proven, they remain a disservice to the work which has brought us to this point

DJ

I have no firm position on the H&L thesis as I haven't read the book and I don't intend to. As far as I'm concerned it doesn't make any difference at all to either the case for conspiracy (which is proven), or the broader implications of the assassination (which have little to do with the life story of the patsy.) I am simply tired of hearing about it.

I would also like to qualify my "here's to another 51 years" comment. The truth is that we don't have anything like that amount of time left. Extrapolating forward from current trends I would give it no more than 15-20 years before most of us are in the fucking gulag; no doubt having a splendid time arguing about whether it's possible for someone's bollocks to increase in size as they get older.