23-05-2015, 08:07 PM
The tone of the letter seems to be effectively minimizing the US's involvement in these affairs. I wonder if this document was drafted with declassification in mind?
I also wonder if the author's use of the term "grave danger" to Iraq, implies a good thing, or a bad thing, or is intentionally left ambiguous?
I also wonder if the author's use of the term "grave danger" to Iraq, implies a good thing, or a bad thing, or is intentionally left ambiguous?
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."