Concensus on MMGW

[Lauren Johnson]

We have seen an exchange of "inconvenient emails" and now see a false accusation of forgery withdrawn and a "it's-just-a-joke" substitu


Arctic Graphs:
Arctic Sea Ice Extent 15% or greater:
(note as of 7/9/13 NSIDC has stopped producing the graph without standard deviation, and automatically inserts the SD envelope no matter which image URL is used. This is related to the issue on display here)

I submit the alarmist hysteria is produced by the cabal blamed for the denial

In the rush to defend the earth its adherents insure that the people JFK sought to help with cheap and plentiful energy are kept suppressed

It is a masterstroke of tactical business acumen, replacing the Cold War with a Oh Dear It's Hot looking-glass model

"Complex?"

Watts has an entire page of updating graphs

which must be viewed with such caveats as he presents at the link

http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pag...-ice-page/

When the people have only sandals and bare hands to scratch at the earth

Walter Duranty will gush at the rosy-cheeked cherubs and beaming peasants

Great data, Phil! Not to rub it in, but it's graphs like these that make me grateful to live in San Diego. It appears that we are heading into a (naturally occurring) cooling cycle, as expected.
Burrr...

The problem with these graphs is that they largely reference area, not volume. Here is an example of a volume graph, which is by far the more accurate and reliable method of analysis.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5333[/ATTACH]

Certainly, there has been a recent increase in area, but the volume increase has not come close to reversing any trend.