Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Eugenics fear over gene modification

Eugenics fear over gene modification

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority is considering whether to recommend legalisation of "mitochondrial replacement" techniques designed to avoid the transmission of mitochondrial diseases (Report, 17 September 2012). We believe the benefits to a small number of parents are heavily outweighed by the risks to the child and to society. This would be the first instance of regulatory approval for modification of the human germ line. There is a long-standing international consensus that we should not cross this ethical line, since it is likely to lead to a future of genetically modified "designer" babies.
Such a slide has already been seen with drugs and surgery. The ugly beginnings of a eugenic market are already visible in the US, where Ivy League student donor eggs are priced 10 times higher than those of working-class women. Genetic enhancement also risks dehumanising and commodifying relationships between children and their parents. These downstream consequences cannot be ignored in making the present decision.
Mitochondrial replacement techniques also create significant epigenetic risks to the prospective child. Prevention of mitochondrial disease can be more safely and reliably accomplished through egg donation. The benefit of mitochondrial replacement is that it fulfils the mother's desire to be genetically related to her child. Such desires are understandable, but this is not a medical benefit. In our view, the benefit for a relatively small number of women of being genetically related to their child does not nearly justify the potential health risks to the child and the deleterious consequences of inheritable human genetic engineering.
Dr David King Human Genetics Alert, UK
Dr Marcy Darnovsky Center for Genetics and Society, USA
Professor Stuart Newman New York Medical College, USA
Dr Murdo Macdonald Science, Religion and Technology Project, Church of Scotland, UK
Dr Abby Lippman Professor Emerita McGill University, Canada
Professor Shree Mulay Memorial University, Canada
Dr Gina Maranto University of Miami, USA
Jaydee Hanson International Center for Technology Assessment, USA
Dr Tina Stevens Alliance for Humane Biotechnology, USA
Diane Beeson Professor Emerita California State University, USA
Dr Carmel Shalev Haifa University, Israel
Professor Charis Thompson University of California Berkeley, USA
Uta Wagenmann Gen-ethisches Netzwerk, Germany
Judy Norsigian Our Bodies Ourselves, USA
Hedva Eyal Isha L'isha, Israel
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Israel’s very own history of eugenics Magda Hassan 0 3,396 28-09-2014, 10:01 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Eugenics, population control and genetically engineered foods? Magda Hassan 5 7,135 24-08-2013, 03:03 AM
Last Post: Cliff Varnell
  Anthrax drug death sparks fear of Europe-wide pandemic Magda Hassan 0 2,664 18-08-2012, 05:23 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Weather Modification Ed Jewett 7 5,851 19-07-2012, 07:44 PM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  Decades of Weather Modification for Military Purposes and Climate Control Ed Jewett 2 3,932 13-09-2011, 03:04 AM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  Billionaires For Eugenics Ed Jewett 0 2,278 09-05-2011, 02:58 AM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  Churchill and Eugenics Magda Hassan 2 4,186 21-01-2011, 06:04 PM
Last Post: Jan Klimkowski
  Jasons ponder military role in gene research Bernice Moore 3 4,125 14-01-2011, 11:39 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Crypto-Eugenics Population Control: Policy and Propaganda Magda Hassan 1 3,164 10-08-2009, 10:51 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)