Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
UK's Orwellian Terrorism Law
#1
Charming. Welcome to our newly emerging police state - thanks to pressure from Uncle Sam.

Quote:UK definition of terrorism 'could catch political journalists and bloggers'

Terror law watchdog says police and prosecutors have exceptional powers that must be confined to 'their proper purpose'

[Image: Police-officer-in-front-o-011.jpg]
David Anderson said UK anti-terror laws were meant to give police powers to tackle al-Qaida-inspired terrorists, rightwing extremists and dissident Northern Irish groups. Photograph: Cate Gillon/Getty Images

The current British definition of terrorism is so broadly drawn that it could even catch political journalists and bloggers who publish material that the authorities consider dangerous to public safety, said the official counter-terrorism watchdog.
David Anderson QC, the official reviewer of counter-terrorism laws, said Britain had some of the most extensive anti-terrorism laws in the western world, which gave police and prosecutors the powers they needed to tackle al-Qaida-inspired terrorists, rightwing extremists and dissident Northern Irish groups.
"But if these exceptional powers are to command public consent, it is important they need to be confined to their proper purpose, and recent years have seen a degree of 'creep' in parliament that could be reversed without diminishing their impact"
In his annual report to be published on Tuesday, Anderson is expected to give three examples of how the terror laws were too widely drawn.
They included "actions aimed at influencing governments", hate crime and what he called the "penumbra of terrorism".
On the first, Anderson said Britain's laws treated politically motivated publication of material thought to endanger life or to create a serious risk to the health or safety of the public as a terrorist act if it was done for the purpose of influencing the government.
He said in other European and Commonwealth countries the bar was set much higher and there must also be an "intention to coerce or intimidate".
The watchdog said: "This means political journalists and bloggers are subject to the full range of anti-terrorism powers if they threaten to publish, prepare to publish something that the authorities think may be dangerous to life, public health or public safety."
He warned that they could be branded as terrorists even if they had no intention to spread fear or intimidate, and those who employed or supported them would also qualify as terrorists.
The definition was so broad it would even catch a campaigner who voiced religious objections to a vaccination campaign on the grounds that they were a danger to public health.
On hate crimes, Anderson said the law made a terrorist out of a pupil who threatened to shoot their teacher on a fascist website, or of the racist who throws a pipe bond at their neighbour's walls. Both were obvious criminals, but if they only intended to harm their immediate victims, no purpose would be served by branding them as terrorists, Anderson said.
The laws were so widely drawn that they now included preparatory and ancillary offences including "terrorism-related activity", which were only used when a crime had been committed and so were unnecessary.
These definitions were so "overbroad" that they could catch a family member "who supports someone who encourages someone else to prepare an act of terrorism and could easily be limited by the home secretary", the watchdog said.
Anderson said Britain quite rightly had very tough counter-terror laws that the public accepted so long as they were used only when necessary.
"But they can currently be applied to journalists and bloggers, to criminals who have no concern other than their immediate victim, and to those who are connected with terrorism only at several removes," he said.
"This is not a criticism of ministers, prosecutors or police who as a rule exercise either their remarkably broad discretions with care and restraint. But it is time parliament reviewed the definition of terrorism to avoid the potential for abuse and to cement public support for special powers that are unfortunately likely to be needed for the foreseeable future."
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14
Reply
#2
Not coincidentally we are doing much the same thing and drafting laws which will give the alphabet agencies more power (and probably money) and jail whistle-blowers and journalists. The joys of being a US client state and hosting US bases and belonging to Echelon and UKUSA.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#3
Indeed. A consequence of the west beginning to set in the sunset for me --- keep the locals blind, dumb and willing.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  New Australian terrorism bill to facilitate targeted military killings Lauren Johnson 0 3,768 01-12-2014, 11:08 PM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  The All New, Singing, Dancing Anti-terrorism Bill - Guaranteed To Be Unjust David Guyatt 2 4,832 28-11-2014, 02:59 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  UK terrorism watchdog scrapped by new law --- free rein to spooks? David Guyatt 1 4,517 18-07-2014, 08:50 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)