Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jim DiEugenio: Not to be Trusted
#21
DiEugenio posts as if he is morally indignant that Pompeo forced Trump and Carlson to shut down the truth on the Kennedy Assassination...Jim phrases his writing as if he himself would be forth-coming on any truthful information according to his own personal beliefs and code of conduct...

Jim doesn't realize that he himself is acting as the Pompeo who shuts down the truth in regard to my posting of the Prayer Man evidence on the Education Forum...Jim has joined up with Gordon and praised him for censoring my correct evidence...The man is a massive hypocrite who has no problem taking the role of Pompeo and then turning around and criticizing it when others do it...
Reply
#22
DiEugenio lauds Jeffery Sachs as being an academic with spine...Which suggests that Jim himself practices such brave dedication to the truth...

DiEugenio's own credibility in the spine department is purely the product of wordsmithing like his post at the Education Forum lauding Sachs...Jim has backbone in words only...If Jim really had the backbone he recognizes in others he would come in to these threads and answer for his treatment of the Prayer Man issue, which is a little less than brave...

If Jim had the backbone he cites in others he would come here and explain why he never recognized my Prayer Man evidence that proved Sarah Stanton was Prayer Man...Or why he accused me of trolling him when I tried to get him to get Stone to obtain the original films...Instead of asking Stone to get the original Wiegman and Darnell scans Jim lied and told the members of the Education Forum that Stone's producer had told me it was not possible to get the films...That isn't true and Robert Wilson actually said he was familiar with the process and all he needed was the word from Stone...Jim then praised James Gordon for banning me saying that I was only trying to troll him and that it was the right thing to do...That was before Gordon recused himself from the moderation because of stealing nearly a year's worth of member's dues...

No, If Jim DiEugenio had the spine he cites in others he would explain why he ignored my discovery of Sarah Stanton hearing Oswald say he wasn't going out to the front steps but was going back in to the Break Room (2nd Floor Lunch Room) instead...This is one of the most important evidence discoveries in JFK research history that Jim, for reasons only know to himself (probably to do with ego), has chosen to deliberately ignore...Instead we are forced to listen to this wheel-spinning sanctimonious editorializing while Jim himself helps prevent a solving of the case by siding with some of the worst characters in JFK research...
Reply
#23
Jim D is in the Jenkins thread on the Education Forum defending Pat Speer and coming in against Doug Horne...


Unbelievable...


Jim commits this research heresy by ignoring Commander Pitzer who filmed the covert autopsy remotely and was murdered by CIA for it...


Good thing Pitzer has DiEugenio covering his back...
Reply
#24
DiEugenio just posted that the Education Forum practices Free Speech...A bigger lie could not be told and all one has to do is examine how that forum handled the Prayer Man issue...When myself, Gilbride, and Graves tried to post that the evidence was showing that Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton all 3 of us were banned...When the recently discovered image of a female dress neckline on Prayer Man was posted on the Education Forum the biased moderators Sandy Larsen and James Gordon thread-slid the thread and made sure its irrefutable proof was never admitted...DiEugenio is a censorship-protected liar when he claims Free Speech is protected on the Education Forum...This false claim is protected by the tolerance of opposing opinions format on the Forum that opens the door for the worst Lone Nutter trolls...Larsen and Gordon have a pro-Prayer Man bias and will not allow the neckline evidence to be brought to its correct conclusion...Gordon extends his own personal agenda in to the moderation and will not allow his site's favorite pet theory to be refuted...Jim is lying and this is the opposite of Free Speech or sound Peer Review...What a god-damned hypocrite...
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DiEugenio On "The Loser's Club" Brian Doyle 0 404 30-12-2023, 07:06 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Reviews Kamp's Book But Doesn't Mention Prayer Man Brian Doyle 0 534 06-10-2023, 02:54 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim DiEugenio Betrays Deep Politics Forum Over Prayer Man Brian Doyle 4 967 05-10-2023, 05:11 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Gives Reference To ROKC Troll Farm And Kamp Brian Doyle 0 542 09-08-2023, 03:02 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Betrays Conspiracy Research Brian Doyle 1 721 07-07-2023, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim DiEugenio Reviews The House of Kennedy Jim DiEugenio 0 2,362 26-04-2020, 06:50 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  James DiEugenio, I have a single question, would you answer? Scott Kaiser 12 7,800 11-06-2019, 04:32 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Denial of Justice reviewed by Jim DiEugenio Jim DiEugenio 4 4,112 23-05-2019, 10:35 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Jim DiEugenio Critiques CNN's American Dynasties Jim DiEugenio 0 14,053 20-07-2018, 09:40 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Jim DiEugenio Zings Chris Mattthews' Bio of RFK Jim DiEugenio 18 28,069 11-06-2018, 10:49 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)