Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Big Brother IS Watching - German Version
#11
Yes Peter. Our lives are an open book. Total Information Awareness. While everything else of theirs is 'Commercial in Confidence' and you can be prosecuted for knowing the wrong thing.
span.jajahWrapper { font-size:1em; color:#B11196; text-decoration:underline; } a.jajahLink { color:#000000; text-decoration:none; } span.jajahInLink:hover { background-color:#B11196; }
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#12
Magda - looks like Australia is doing its bit for Spooks United.... Rolleyes

The truth is that the internet should give law enforcement much greater ability to track down and bust paedophile rings. Instead the horrors of paedophilia are used by TPTB as a Trojan Horse to monitor us all and target those who dare to look behind MSM's veil of nonsense.

Quote:'Net filters "required" for all Australians, no opt-out
By Jacqui Cheng | Published: October 16, 2008 - 11:14AM CT

Australians may not be able to opt out of the government's Internet filtering initiative like they were originally led to believe. Details have begun to come out about Australia's Cyber-Safety Plan, which aims to block "illegal" content from being accessed within the country, as well as pornographic material inappropriate for children. Right now, the system is in the testing stages, but network engineers are now saying that there's no way to opt out entirely from content filtering.
Related Stories

* Australia to spend $189 million on anti-porn tech initiative
* Australia to enforce a "ratings system" on Web, track users

The Australian government first revealed its filtering initiative in 2007, which it expected to cost AUS$189 million to implement. That money would go toward imposing filtering requirements on ISPs, who would have to use the Australian Communications and Media Authority's official blacklist, which is in turn based on the country's National Classification Scheme.

Australia moved forward with its plans despite widespread public outcry and began testing the system in Tasmania in February of this year. At the time, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) said that the filters would be enabled by default and that consumers would have to request unfiltered connectivity if they wished to opt-out of the program.

Well, it turns out now that those promises were only partially true. Internode network engineer Mark Newton told Computerworld that users are able to opt out of the "additional material" blacklist—which targets content inappropriate for children—but not the main blacklist that filters what the Australian government determines is illegal content.

"That is the way the testing was formulated, the way the upcoming live trials will run, and the way the policy is framed; to believe otherwise is to believe that a government department would go to the lengths of declaring that some kind of Internet content is illegal, then allow an opt-out," Newton said. "Illegal is illegal and if there is infrastructure in place to block it, then it will be required to be blocked—end of story."

A spokesperson for the Australian Communications Minister seemed to confirm this revelation by saying that the filters would be required for all Australian citizens.

Assuming this is in fact the way the scheme is implemented in practice, it raises plenty of troubling questions. "Illegal" is a broad definition, leaving users wondering exactly what kinds of content will end up falling prey to the government's apparently mandatory filtering restrictions. Will Big Content be ringing up the Aussie government soon to have tracker sites added to the blacklist? What about sites that discuss topics like at-home bomb making, or something a little less explosive, like DVD decryption tools? And how about those sites that advise users on how to get around the filters? Will various Wikipedia pages be blocked?

Australia continues to ignore its own government-funded studies from 2006 that show ISP-level filtering to be ineffective and costly. The Australian government's disregard for those prior studies suggests that the driving force behind the current plan is more political than technical.

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/200...t-out.html
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."

Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon

"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  ... German Security Agencies Caught Planting Spyware on Private Computers Ed Jewett 0 2,704 16-10-2011, 10:32 PM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  More web fears. They ARE watching us. Dawn Meredith 1 2,549 14-03-2009, 04:46 PM
Last Post: Dawn Meredith
  Big Brother, Thy Name Be Ye Google? Peter Lemkin 4 4,318 12-02-2009, 07:09 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  STELLAR WIND: Big Brother Made Flesh Jan Klimkowski 0 22,344 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Big Brother, Apple and Google watchin' over you.....can almost read what your reading. Peter Lemkin 0 3,414 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  14 Incredibly Creepy Surveillance Technologies That Big Brother Will Soon Be Using To Spy On You Lauren Johnson 0 7,146 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)