Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is "9/11 Truth" based upon a false theory?
#11
Where is Vincent Salandria when we need him?

'Whenever there is any doubt, there is no doubt.'


Peter Lemkin Wrote:
Kyle Burnett Wrote:
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:The iron micro spheres could come from other processes aside from a thermitic reaction I suspect.
Sure, perhaps the devil planted them, like dinosaur bones, eh?:

Seriously man, absent another plausible explanation, you're just wallowing in denial of the evidence.

Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Harrit mentioned the other day that they would have needed of there was 260 tons per WTC floor of NT.
Could you please rephrase that?

Certain people on certain Forums have as their raison d'etre to keep doubt alive...by whatever rhetorical mechanisms or posting subjects, et al. The doubt is used as an attempt to divide and conquer....and just cast seeds of doubt. JO seems to have found a comfortable place from himself on this Forum as the 911 doubting-inserter elf. Any study of the trend of his posts shows they are either promoting his one in a billion spontaneous collapse nonsense or doubt - both try to deflect, IMHO, from anyone looking the truth squarely in the face.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"
Reply
#12
Lemkin,

Wrong. I my purpose may be to case doubt in the minds of people who have been clinging to false beliefs... such as yourself. But the intent is not to fracture the movement and cause dissension, but rather to more accurately describe what happened to the towers.

I do not claim a spontaneous collapse. There had to have been energy inputs to alter the static balance of the structures to cause them to collapse. This could be properly placed explosions or some mechanism for weakening the columns which provided the axial support for not only themselves but for all the building components and mass and of course the occupants and furniture etc.

Whatever caused or initiated the collapse it became a progressive destruction which lasted about 11-14 seconds. You want to believe that it was hundreds or thousands of explosion over that interval. You would be wrong in that belief.

The imitating cause could and likely was not ONLY the plane damage and the fires which they caused. But once the first proverbial domino tipped, the others simply cannot resist. I understand that you and others can't seem to accept that a global collapse of such magnitude is possibly a progressive process. But in fact, it is and that has some rather interesting implications for who did it and how it could have been done.

I suggest you spend a few days reading the 911 Free Forums where this research can be found.
Reply
#13
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:You want to believe that it was hundreds or thousands of explosion over that interval. You would be wrong in that belief.
So you contend, but while there are plenty of undisputed examples of lots of explosives bringing down real world buildings in comparable intervals, those of you who suggest such quantities of explosives aren't needed to bring down buildings so quickly and completely have never even managed to produce a simulation which comes anywhere close to supporting that notion.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  NPR censors 9/11 truth (hangs up on caller) Ed Jewett 1 2,531 19-10-2011, 06:59 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  "Dulles Airport" Shadow disproves US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory Ed Jewett 3 5,957 18-10-2011, 10:08 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 6,172 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  The 10th Anniversary of 9/11 and the search for Truth Henry Platsky 0 1,939 18-09-2011, 04:25 PM
Last Post: Henry Platsky
  911 conspiracy theory in under 5 minutes. Magda Hassan 0 1,814 12-09-2011, 03:16 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  The Debate over 9/11 Truth: Kevin Ryan vs. Jim Fetzer James H. Fetzer 1 2,957 08-08-2011, 03:42 PM
Last Post: James H. Fetzer
  The Case for 9/11 Truth Urgency Ed Jewett 0 2,196 30-05-2010, 04:11 AM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  9/11 Truth Red Herring (by Scott Creighton) Ed Jewett 0 2,781 27-05-2010, 07:21 AM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  New Paper Demolishes NIST 'Theory' Peter Lemkin 0 2,566 19-05-2010, 05:31 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  "The super-classified network that served as command and control for the 9/11 false flag attack on A Ed Jewett 2 3,216 01-05-2010, 04:57 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)