Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Goldman Sachs say US interest rates must hit minus 6%
#1
Latest research out today suggests that the Fed rate needs to go to -6% by end of 2010 to correctly absorb the downturn in the economy.

As we know, the Fed rate is bounded by 0% so this suggests that ZIRP (zero-interest rate policy) will not sufficiently help the economy (by 6%!). This means that additional stimulus packages must continue to soften the downturn.

Further comments from GS: they predict that ZIRP will be here for approx 5 years. Their forecasting measure suggests the forecast rate will reach positive again in approx. 5 years. This measure is based on forecasted unemployment rates and inflation forecasts.

[Image: image001.jpg]

Negative interest is very unusual but not unheard of. In the late 1970's Switzerland ran a negative interest rate system to deter foreign investors owning Swiss Francs.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14
Reply
#2
Negative interest rates, eh.

Now that's my kind of loan. I think it's about time I called the bank. Confusedmokin:
Reply
#3
Um, does a negative interest rate mean I pay interest to the bank for saving my money with them?

That'd be rilly rilly cool... Thrasher

I'm sure that smooth talking reincarnation of the man who went to war to free the slaves, aka Wall Street Obama, will be able to sell that one to the sheeple....




Whaddya mean Lincoln didn't go to war to free the slaves????
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."

Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon

"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
Reply
#4
Wow...someone's been drinking something good....fine whiskey, for sure...or a funny smelling cig...

What the '****' is negative interest? Zero interest [as we now are at on some arcane rates] is surreal enough...

Do tell...!!!!!:dancing2::dancing2::dancing2:
Reply
#5
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Wow...someone's been drinking something good....fine whiskey, for sure...or a funny smelling cig...

What the '****' is negative interest? Zero interest [as we now are at on some arcane rates] is surreal enough...

Do tell...!!!!!:dancing2::dancing2::dancing2:

It means that the bank pays me a generous 6% and all I have to do to earn it is borrow their money. It's the financial equivalent of faster than light speed. A parallel universe, even.

I knew if I waited long enough, things would break my way.

I'm holding out for 10% though. I think I'm worth it.
Reply
#6
Quote:Negative interest is very unusual but not unheard of. In the late 1970's Switzerland ran a negative interest rate system to deter foreign investors owning Swiss Francs.

I remember that time. Many financial geniuses here advised people to take out loans in Swiss francs and a bit later when the Australian dollar was floated and promptly plummeted to become the Pacific Peso there was a huge wave of bankruptcies as primary producers lost their farms and others lost their businesses. Nice one. Then interest rates went up in leaps and bounds and people couldn't afford to buy a house here any more.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#7
I googled NEGATIVE INTEREST and here is a quick summary as I understand it.

It is a scheme whereby a LENDER lures BORROWERS to borrow money
by PAYING THEM TO BORROW. Then, to pay off the loan, the borrowers
must PAY A HIGHER RATE AT DUE DATE than they received when they
were lured into the scheme. Thus IN THE END, the LENDER MAKES A PROFIT.

An illustration was given where financial whiz Warren Buffet used the
scheme to PAY INVESTORS to invest in his company...but in the end
the investors received less on their investment than if they had not
borrowed...and Buffet pocketed the difference.

That is how I understood it. You get money right now, but you have to
pay back more in the future. Am I wrong?

Jack
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  It's all Goldman Sachs' fault says Matt Taibbi Jan Klimkowski 83 63,139 17-10-2016, 02:05 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Goldman: Pwned? Magda Hassan 18 9,545 12-08-2012, 02:53 AM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  Former Goldman Commodities Research Analyst Confirms LMBA OTC Gold Market Is "Paper Gold" Ponzi Magda Hassan 0 1,981 29-03-2010, 01:22 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Secret AIG Document Shows Goldman Sachs Minted Most Toxic CDOs Magda Hassan 1 2,288 25-02-2010, 11:20 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Goldman Sach's tentacles and worldwide network Magda Hassan 1 2,652 19-07-2009, 12:24 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Ex-Goldman Banker Behind WSJ 'Smear Campaign' Against Elizabeth Warren Magda Hassan 0 2,006 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Senate panel says Goldman ‘clearly misled’ clients, Congress Magda Hassan 0 2,228 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Matt Taibbi, “The People vs. Goldman Sachs” 0 215 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  The Fed Announces Enforcement Action Against Goldman Sachs 0 157 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Former Goldman Sachs Director Charged with Insider Trading Ed Jewett 0 2,146 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)