Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Giant, Raging Hurricane of Theft and Fraud
#1
03.02.12 - 2:30 PM

A Giant, Raging Hurricane of Theft and Fraud



A new citizen action campaign, F* (for foreclose, they say) the Banks is taking aim at the Bank of America in a series of actions starting March 15. Opening salvos include a call to action from Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi to "allow failure - ie BofA - to fail," and a move by Public Citizen to force the feds to break it up.

"There are two things every American needs to know about Bank of America. The first is that it's corrupt. This bank has systematically defrauded almost everyone with whom it has a significant business relationship, cheating investors, insurers, homeowners, shareholders, depositors, and the state. It is a giant, raging hurricane of theft and fraud, spinning its way through America and leaving a massive trail of wiped-out retirees and foreclosed-upon families in its wake.

The second is that all of us, as taxpayers, are keeping that hurricane raging.

Bank of America is not just a private company that systematically steals from American citizens: it's a de facto ward of the state that depends heavily upon public support to stay in business.
In fact, without the continued generosity of us taxpayers, and the extraordinary indulgence of our regulators and elected officials, this company long ago would have been swallowed up by scandal, mismanagement, prosecution and litigation, and gone out of business.

This gigantic financial institution is the ultimate symbol of a new kind of corruption at the highest levels of American society: a tendency to marry the near-limitless power of the federal government with increasingly concentrated, increasingly unaccountable private financial interests."

- Matt Taibbi

[Image: foreclosure.png]



http://www.commondreams.org/further/2012/03/02-0
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
Buckminster Fuller
Reply
#2
Published on Friday, March 2, 2012 by The Rolling Stone

Bank of America In Trouble?

by Matt Taibbi

It looks like Bank of America might have started circling the drain before the Occupy movement even had a chance to launch its campaign against the company. For weeks now there have been ominous signs of trouble at the bank, and yesterday we heard yet another dark piece of news.

Last year, there was an uproar when Bank of America announced a plan to slap customers with a monthly $5 fee for debit card usage. The bank eventually backed off that plan when the public and some politicians cried foul.

Now it seems the company is going to try to put a new package on the same crappy idea and sell it again. This time, the plan is to add charges that range from $6 to $25 a month. From an MSNBC report:
Pilot programs in Arizona, Georgia and Massachusetts are experimenting with charging $6 to $9 a month for what's called an "Essentials" account. Other account options being tested in those states carry monthly charges of $9, $12, $15 and $25, but give customers opportunities to avoid the payments by maintaining minimum balances, using a credit card or taking a mortgage with Bank of America, according to an internal memo cited by the [Wall Street] Journal.

It's a very bad sign that a bank is in a desperate cash crunch when it tries repeatedly to gouge its customers. David Trainer, an analyst for Market Watch, a WSJ publication, wrote that the new fees are a sign of series trouble at BAC. He writes:
In my opinion, there are four actions taken by financial services that signal the company is headed to serious trouble.
1. Management shake-up and major layoffs - lots of layoffs over the past year
2. Exploiting accounting rules to boost earnings - SFAS 159
3. Drawing down reserves to boost earnings: to the tune of $13.3 billion in 2011 and 2012
4. Bilking customers with new fees: tried it before and trying it again
Bank of America has taken all four steps. Bilking customers with new fees is a desperate measure of last resort because it requires exploiting the one asset the bank has left, namely its customers.

Trainer in an earlier column urged investors to dump Bank of America for a number of reasons, but mostly because he had reservations about some of the numbers in the bank's most recent SEC filing.

According to him, the bank aggressively exploited a new accounting rule called SFAS no. 159, which allows companies to enables banks to "arti­fi­cially boost earn­ings when the value of their own debt declines." In other words, BAC was able to artificially re-state earnings when its own credit quality went into the tank.

Trainer also believes that Bank of America's recent rise in share price is based on a series of impossible, pie-in-the-sky expectations, including "20% annual revenue growth for 18 years."

All of this comes on the heels of an announcement that Fannie Mae was cutting off Bank of America, news that itself came after Bank of America, in its annual report, had earlier announced that it would no longer sell loans to Fannie Mae. Basically, Bank of America tried to quit Fannie Mae before it got fired. It seems Bank of America in the last quarter of 2011 was slower even than usual in honoring repurchase requests, yet another sign of a cash crunch.

Why does all of this matter to the rest of America? Because what happens with Bank of America will be an important litmus test going forward for how we deal with any Too-Big-To-Fail behemoth that gets itself into trouble. We've already seen that the recent foreclosure deal was a huge boon to Bank of America it spared it from the uncertainty of a generation of robosigning suits.

But what happens if Bank of America is still headed for bankruptcy? Helping the bank avoid a few lawsuits is one thing, and allowing it to move its dangerously toxic derivatives portfolio onto the federally-insured side of the company is another. But a full-blown crash of this firm would require a massive bailout. What will the Obama administration do if faced with that dilemma? One way or another, it will be a momentous decision.

© 2012 The Rolling Stone
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
Buckminster Fuller
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Wall Street/DOJ fraud David Guyatt 2 3,932 16-11-2014, 11:25 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Unheralded report by Channel 4's economic editor on latest forex fraud by banks David Guyatt 1 3,082 15-11-2014, 01:04 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Fraud Police move into Anglo Irish Bank David Guyatt 7 6,927 21-11-2013, 09:18 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Complex International Tale of Theft, Intelligence, Oil, Political Control & Injustice Peter Lemkin 4 5,393 19-10-2013, 05:01 PM
Last Post: Keith Millea
  Bill Black on "Accounting Control Fraud" Lauren Johnson 3 3,781 28-05-2013, 09:34 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  The Startling Link Between Globalisation and Bank Fraud Magda Hassan 3 3,694 01-02-2013, 09:16 PM
Last Post: Jan Klimkowski
  White Hats Report #34 on British investigation of Bush cabal fraud Ed Jewett 0 2,733 19-01-2012, 11:58 PM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  LPS Foreclosure Fraud Whistleblower Found Dead Lauren Johnson 0 2,223 30-11-2011, 05:59 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  The Sub Prime Fraud is 70 times bigger Bernice Moore 0 1,807 06-11-2011, 02:19 PM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  One of the MOST Significant Factors in the ONGOING GLOBAL THEFT OF ALL MONEY! Peter Lemkin 0 1,943 15-04-2011, 04:48 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)