PDA

View Full Version : Shock Doctrine in a city near you



Magda Hassan
05-08-2013, 11:54 PM
Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
A troubling pattern emerges as private funds seek to profit from beleaguered cities - Jon Queally, staff writer

In Detroit, a once bustling city at the center of the US economy, the hedge fund vultures are circling.
But first, a moment of background, employing Naomi Klein's contemporary classic The Shock Doctrine (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312427999?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=0312427999&linkCode=xm2&tag=commondreams-20), which tells the story of how purveyors of aggressive capitalism take advantage of crises and public vulnerability in order to push through neoliberal policies and profit-motivated financial arrangements.
Played out in various spheres before and after the book's publication in 2005, the idea of 'disaster capitalism' has been at the center of austerity politics on both sides of the Atlantic (and around the world) in the wake of the 2008 financial meltdown. And now, in places like Detroit, its taking place in US communities at the municipal level as towns and cities hit hard by diminished economies and the slashing of public services are struggling on the edge of bankruptcy.
But, as reporting (http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/08/us-usa-detroit-funds-idUSBRE94704P20130508) by Reuters on Wednesday reveals, one city's pain is a possible hedge fund manager's gain.
As Reuters' Tom Hals explains, large private hedge funds, which once preyed on vulnerable companies ripe for liquidation and restructuring, are now taking aim at wounded cities and counties—with no place beckoning "more than Detroit."

This sudden interest in the staid world of municipal debt comes as these so-called distressed funds are looking for new places to put their money. Lucrative corporate bankruptcies have dried up, thanks in part to the Federal Reserve's policy of low interest rates. [...]
But despite the risks, some are already betting hundreds of millions of dollars that there are big returns in cash-strapped governments.
In Detroit, where a previous ploy of the disaster capitalists (https://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/03/14-7) has already taken hold in the form of an appointed "Financial Emergency Manager"—a position that strips out local government and puts city decision-making into unelected, bureaucratic hands—the people have almost no political avenue to resist the sale of public assets or the manipulation of city debt.
And as Hals notes, "the hedge funds' interest in municipal debt reflects the divergent fortunes of Wall Street and Main Street." He continues:

Distressed debt funds love to jump in when most bail out. But with the coffers of U.S. companies overflowing with cash, there has been a dearth of the debt defaults, bankruptcies and liquidations that such funds normally feast on.
By contrast, a small but potentially growing number of U.S. cities and towns are struggling with pay and pension obligations that they took on in the boom years. As well as Jefferson County, the California towns of Stockton and San Bernardino have recently filed for bankruptcy.
And Detroit's fragile state—and the existence of the city's emergency manager Kevyn Orr—make the city enormously vulnerable and thus attractive to hedge funds.

Detroit was once America's fifth largest city and a thriving center of U.S. industry. Now, its population has plummeted to 700,000 from a peak of 1.8 million, a third live in poverty and basic services such as street lighting have broken down. Michigan Governor Rick Snyder appointed Orr, a corporate bankruptcy expert, in March to take over the city's finances.
Even if the city does not file for bankruptcy, its debt will likely be restructured, providing an opportunity for hedge funds to make a profit. [...]
Financial advisers, restructuring consultants and lawyers who work with the funds have told Reuters they have been fielding calls, digging through documents and even flying to Detroit as they try to pinpoint a profitable investment.
"Everyone is looking for ways into Detroit. It's new and unique," said Marti Kopacz, who founded Brant Point Advisors, which provides turnaround advice to municipal governments.
One of the normally secretive distressed debt fund managers confirmed the funds are circling the Motor City.
But what of the warnings? What does it mean to "liquidate" or "restructure" a city in the same manner you might a failed electronics company or an unprofitable factory?
According to Marti Kopacz, a financial adviser who offers guidance to municipal governments and was interviewed by Reuters for his expertise on the big-money interests circling Detroit: "I think it will be a period of time where the distressed investor community will come to an appreciation that these situations are so very, very different from a commercial bankruptcy," he said.
"Everyone points to the politics but it's even more fundamental than that. If you live in the north you have to take care of the snow and you have to have a police department and a fire department. You can't liquidate a city."
And then, of course, these questions remain: How long will "this period of time" be? And how much damage to the city might be done as the vultures gain "appreciation" whilst snacking on their scrumptious, municipal lunch?
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/05/08-0

Lauren Johnson
05-09-2013, 12:19 AM
The single trouble I have with Naomi Klein's work is that she specifically excludes conspiracy. Disaster capitalism, as she defines it, takes advantage of disasters by having templates in waiting, which could never be implimented by any other than a shocked public. They are the masters of opportunism. Her work excludes a deep political lens. Who could think that putting cities into trouble could be foreseen and planned?

Ask John Perkins in Confessions of and Economic Hit Man whose job it was to plan and impliment economic disaster in third world countries. He was instructed to use debt as a weapon that would be used to the advantage of large economic interests. Fits into the Predetory State narrative. The template is there; it has been implimented before. Why not engage in asset stripping on the domestic front?

Magda Hassan
05-09-2013, 12:27 AM
I agree Lauren. In that respect she has much in common with Chomsky and like him she is also profoundly anti-communist too. Of course manipulations and planning gone into creating all of this. It is a shame she does not acknowledge it.

Lauren Johnson
05-09-2013, 01:32 AM
I agree Lauren. In that respect she has much in common with Chomsky and like him she is also profoundly anti-communist too. Of course manipulations and planning gone into creating all of this. It is a shame she does not acknowledge it.

She acknowledges the influence of David Harvey and has studied with him.

Magda Hassan
05-09-2013, 01:49 AM
I don't know too much about David Harvey. He has had a big impact on her studies re public/privitised space etc but I am not sure what his position on value and surplus and capital accumulation and other areas might be. For sure not all Marxist agree that capitalism is conspiratorial in function.

Jan Klimkowski
05-09-2013, 07:18 PM
as reporting by Reuters on Wednesday reveals, one city's pain is a possible hedge fund manager's gain.
As Reuters' Tom Hals explains, large private hedge funds, which once preyed on vulnerable companies ripe for liquidation and restructuring, are now taking aim at wounded cities and counties—with no place beckoning "more than Detroit."


Charlie Sheen & Michael Douglas in Wall Street:


Bud: How much is enough, Gordon? When does it all end, huh? How many yachts can you water-ski behind? How much is enough, huh?

Gekko: It's not a question of enough, pal. It's a Zero Sum game – somebody wins, somebody loses. Money itself isn't lost or made, it's simply transferred – from one perception to another. Like magic.

David Guyatt
05-10-2013, 08:18 AM
The drawback with a great many academics, and many other professionals in fact, is that they decline to acknowledge conspiracies occur. I very much suspect that their fear is that they will be tarred with the smelly brush of "conspiracy theorist". See, for example, the post I just put up on the Boston bombing (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?11438-Breaking-Explosion-Reported-at-Boston-Marathon-s-Finish-Line/page49) article by Paul Craig Roberts and his run in with the Huffington Post reporter. You can smell the fear and panic the journalist felt when he realised Roberts was in the 911 camp.

But the whole argument about conspiracy theories is simply fallacious, illogical and artificially contrived.

Conspiracy is part of human nature and, as such, form part and parcel of daily life - at every level (Caesar and Brutus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Julius_Caesar)being a classic historical case of the genre). It is ludicrous to suggest otherwise, but denial has become deeply embedded in the fear receptors of modern man's psyche. It is now better to duck and hide from the glaring truth than utter it. This intellectual dishonesty is about retaining prestige and surviving in the professional jungle.

denial of conspiracy defines ethical weakness in my opinion.

Magda Hassan
05-10-2013, 09:45 AM
http://www.entelechyjournal.com/emperor.jpg