PDA

View Full Version : Surprise! Surprise! Surprise! 9/11 Omission Lied Says Lead Lawyer!



Peter Lemkin
04-18-2009, 08:35 PM
The senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission - John Farmer - says that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11, echoing the assertions of fellow 9/11 Commission members who concluded that the Pentagon were engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack.

Farmer served as Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (officially known as the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States), and is also a former New Jersey Attorney General.

Farmer's book about his experiences working for the Commission is entitled The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America's Defense on 9/11, and is set to be released in September.

The book unveils how "the public had been seriously misled about what occurred during the morning of the attacks," and Farmer himself states that "at some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened."

Only the very naive would dispute that an agreement not to tell the truth is an agreement to lie. Farmer's contention is that the government agreed to create a phony official version of events to cover-up the real story behind 9/11.

The publisher of the book, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, states that, "Farmer builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version not only is almost entirely untrue but serves to create a false impression of order and security."

In August 2006, the Washington Post reported, "Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate."

The report revealed how the 10-member commission deeply suspected deception to the point where they considered referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation.

"We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. "It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."

Farmer himself is quoted in the Post article, stating, "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true."

As we also reported in August 2006, released portions of NORAD tapes from 9/11, which were featured in a Vanity Fair article, do little to answer skeptic's questions about the impotence of U.S. air defenses on 9/11 and if anything only increase focus on the incompatibility of the official version of events with what is actually known to have taken place on that day.

Make no mistake, Farmer is not saying that 9/11 was an inside job, however, Farmer's testimony, along with that of his fellow 9/11 Commission members, conclusively demonstrates that, whatever really happened on 9/11, the official story as told to the public on the day and that which remains the authorities' version of events today, is a lie - according to the very people who were tasked by the government to investigate it. This is a fact that no debunker or government apologist can ever legitimately deny. http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-commission-counsel-government-agreed-to-lie-about-911.html

Peter Lemkin
04-19-2009, 05:22 AM
The book will be published in Canada tomorrow, the US in September, and the UK in May 2010 Very strange...but what isn't when it comes to Sept. 11! :bebored:

Magda Hassan
04-19-2009, 08:16 AM
Big fat waste of money then, hey? Any one going to refund their pay? Didn't think so. The wheels keep on turning. Grinding on. So, it wasn't an 'inside' job but the truth must not be told and perhaps lies told? Mmmm...
Wonder what the 'peer reviewed 'journal advisors will say to this. LOL!

Peter Lemkin
04-19-2009, 08:38 AM
Big fat waste of money then, hey? Any one going to refund their pay? Didn't think so. The wheels keep on turning. Grinding on. So, it wasn't an 'inside' job but the truth must not be told and perhaps lies told? Mmmm...
Wonder what the 'peer reviewed 'journal advisors will say to this. LOL!

I'm sure they feel it was money, disinformation and time well spent. In fact, these kinds of [like WC] faux-reports are very important - like with synchronized swimming - all must learn to move in concert - same with sychronized lying - it gives it away [sooner] if they all tell a different lie. That is the reason Bush and Chaney testified together and not under oath - gotta get the wrong story 'right' together [synchronized]. And it gives the Mockingbirds their reference points, etc.

Charles Drago
04-19-2009, 11:27 AM
Beware the limited "incompetence" hang-out that likely was part of the plan from Day One, and that is being implemented on schedule.

To wit: Yeah, we lied. But it was a necessary lie. We didn't want to alarm the American people or embarrass the military by exposing the weaknesses and ineptitude of NORAD, its methods, and its personnel.

Not to mention: Of course it was OBL and AQ, and we could have and should have dealt with the planes they hijacked.

Precedent: The Secret Service screwed up in Dallas to make the motorcade "uniquely insecure."

The thing about the lh-o (as opposed to LHO): It savagely marginalizes all who appear to be insatiably unsatisfied with its courageous, truth-at-all-costs "admissions."

These damn conspiracy theorists! Will NOTHING satisfy them?

The kindest view of John Farmer: He has been suckered.

Peter Lemkin
04-19-2009, 11:40 AM
[QUOTE=Charles Drago;6255]

These damn conspiracy theorists! Will NOTHING satisfy them?

Nothing but the FULL TRUTH, and our country and Planet back! - not a request - a DEMAND and one this human is willing to give his life to [and nearly has] - in positive ways, or in forfeit, trying.......

Magda Hassan
04-19-2009, 11:43 AM
Precedent: "Of course it wasn't LHO but we couldn't risk a war with Cuba because that would have brought in the USSR and millions of Americans would have died."

Myra Bronstein
04-19-2009, 04:57 PM
In this culture the "truth" will only come out in a high priced for-profit book after it's likely too late to make a difference. Even then it's probably not the "truth." Capitalism in all its gory glory.

Magda Hassan
04-20-2009, 12:04 AM
In this culture the "truth" will only come out in a high priced for-profit book after it's likely too late to make a difference. Even then it's probably not the "truth." Capitalism in all its gory glory.In this culture the truth, if it ever comes out, will likely come in a book labeled 'fiction' While much of those labeled 'history' belong in the fiction shelves. Corporatism in all its glory.

Myra Bronstein
04-20-2009, 02:52 AM
In this culture the "truth" will only come out in a high priced for-profit book after it's likely too late to make a difference. Even then it's probably not the "truth." Capitalism in all its gory glory.In this culture the truth, if it ever comes out, will likely come in a book labeled 'fiction' While much of those labeled 'history' belong in the fiction shelves. Corporatism in all its glory.

That's true. Gore Vidal wrote a series of historical "fiction" that's more informative than all the history texts I've been forced to study.