PDA

View Full Version : Nullify NSA: the NSA has an Achilles heel



Magda Hassan
02-03-2014, 07:07 AM
http://offnow.org/

http://www.change.org/petitions/utah-turn-the-water-off-introduce-the-4th-amendment-protection-act-in-utah-to-stop-nsa-spying
The Plan In 2006, it was reported that the NSA had maxed out capacity of the Baltimore-area power grid. Insiders reported that

“The NSA is already unable to install some costly and sophisticated new equipment. At minimum, the problem could produce disruptions leading to outages and power surges.
At worst, it could force a virtual shutdown of the agency.”
August 6, 2006
In other words, the NSA has an Achilles heel.

WATER
To get around the physical limitation of the amount of power required to monitor virtually every piece of communication around the globe, the NSA started searching for new locations with their own power supplies.
The new Utah Data Center opening in Bluffdale was chosen due to the access to cheap utilities, primarily water. The water-cooled supercomputers require 1.7 million gallons of water per day to function.
No water = No data center.
The water being provided to the Utah Data Center comes from a political subdivision of the state of Utah.
They have the ability to turn that water off.
The situation is the same at many other locations. Read on for more details.
4TH AMENDMENT PROTECTION ACT
The model legislation (HERE (https://s3.amazonaws.com/TAClegislation/4th-Amendment-Protection-Act.pdf)), ready for introduction in any state, would ban a state (and all political subdivisions) from providing assistance or material support in any way with the NSA spying program.
This would include, but is not limited to:


Refusing to supply water or electricity from state or locally-owned or operated utilities
A ban on all law enforcement acceptance of information provided without warrant, by the NSA or it’s Special Operations Division (SOD)
Severe penalties for any corporations providing services for or on behalf of the state which fill the gap and provide the NSA the resources it requires to stay functional.

While the federal government would not be prevented from bringing in its own supplies, it’s not likely that they have the capacity to do so.
The states and local communities should simply turn it off.
LEGAL DOCTRINE
The legal doctrine behind this is “anti-commandeering.” It’s the principle that the federal government doesn’t have the authority to force the states (or local communities) to carry out federal laws, regulatory programs, and the like. The Supreme Court affirmed this three times in recent years, the cases being: 1997 Printz, 2002 New York, 2012 Sebelius. It also affirmed this doctrine in the 1842 Prigg case where states refused to assist the federal government in capturing and returning runaway slaves.
This is also consistent with what James Madison advised when writing about the Constitution in Federalist #46. Among the four steps he advised as “powerful means” to oppose federal power was “a refusal to cooperate with officers of the Union.”
MANY LOCATIONS
It’s not just Utah. The NSA is reliant on many states and local communities to provide the resources required to operate their spying programs.
In Texas, the new data center opening in San Antonio has its electricity provided exclusively by the the city-owned power company. And the NSA was quite upfront about the fact that Texas was chosen because of its independent power grid. The NSA is extremely concerned about basic utilities.
And states providing them don’t have to.
In Augusta Georgia, the “threat operations center” has its water and even sewage treatment provided by local government services.
There’s also NSA “data centers” or “listening posts” in Colorado, Washington, West Virginia, Tennessee, and Hawaii. Each one is a unique circumstance where a multi-prong strategy can and will create roadblocks to implementation.
CORPORATIONS
While many locations rely on state or local governments to assist or directly provide badly-needed utilities, others partner closely with corporations to do so.
For example, in Augusta, Georgia, a partnership with Georgia Power (a subsidiary of the massive electric holding company in the US, the Southern Company), literally kept the lights on.
The local paper reported that “Before a partnership in 2006 with Georgia Power, outages were a regular occurrence on post, particularly during the summer, when heavy demands were placed on the system.”
UNIVERSITIES
The NSA has its tentacles deep into the youth as well, with heavy partnerships at Universities in all but 8 US states. In late 2012, the NSA reported that there are now 166 universities in this program (http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/press_room/2012/academic_excellence_designees.shtml). (see the full list here (http://www.nsa.gov/ia/academic_outreach/nat_cae/institutions.shtml))
These “Centers of Academic Excellence” are not just a recruiting ground for future analysts in the massive spy centers around the country, they provide valuable research partnerships to bolster the NSA’s spying and data-collection capabilities. Universities are often provided with funding, scholarships and other tools to expand research and recruitment.
LAW ENFORCEMENT
The NSA has often claimed to be engaging in such activities to protect you from “terrorists,” and many people have accepted this kind of personal intrusion with the belief that they were being kept safe. But the fact is that their programs are much broader – by far.
The Special Operations Division (SOD) was a highly-secret federal unit which is passing information collected without warrant by the NSA to state and local law enforcement for the investigation of regular crimes – not terrorism-related at all.
STRATEGY
A multi-prong strategy is an absolute must when working to prevent the kind of 4th Amendment violations seen under the NSA spying program.
Currently, activists are engaged in the support of lawsuits from EFF and ACLU, and in support of Congressional legislation to limit or stop the NSA. But waiting for these to play out positively is a dangerous game of chicken.
A recent vote in Congress which failed to defund the NSA spying program indicates that relying on them to stop the NSA isn’t enough.
By approaching the NSA on multiple fronts, it’s certainly possible to overwhelm them and make their programs too difficult or costly to carry out. A program to Turn it Off and render the NSA’s spying program as good as null and void intersects in 5 main areas:


State legislation – passed in every state, banning cooperation, compliance, and law enforcement collaboration.
Local Resolutions – passed in every possible county, city and town, supporting these principles and calling on the state to pass the 4th Amendment Protection Act
Corporate Protests – and opposition to those corporations providing the resources needed to carry out the NSA spying program.
Campus Actions – including both protests against NSA/University partnerships, and organizational and student government resolutions formally calling for an end to such partnerships.
Environmental concerns – the waste of resources is massive, with millions of gallons of water being used every single day at just one NSA facility.

From Thoreau to Rosa Parks, and from Ghandi to you – a successful strategy to protect your liberties requires non-compliance and peaceful resistance.
And, as Rosa Parks proved, saying “NO!” can change the world.

Magda Hassan
06-09-2014, 02:41 AM
Feds Validate OffNow Plan to Shut Off Water What can a government do when another government engages in acts it considers illegal and all of the usual actions fail to effect change?
How about turn off the water?
That is one of the approaches the OffNow coalition took to stop NSA spying. The plan: get state and local governments to deny the agency resources. In Bluffdale, Utah, that would mean shutting off the city-supplied water to the NSA data collection facility.
Apparently, the feds consider it a pretty good idea.
Last week, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation announced it would not allow the use of any federally controlled water on marijuana crops.
“As a federal agency, Reclamation is obligated to adhere to federal law in the conduct of its responsibilities to the American people,” Bureau of Reclamation chief of public affairs Dan DuBray said.
According to a McClatchy newspaper report (http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/05/20/227933/feds-wont-allow-water-for-pot.html#storylink=cpy), the decision could prove particularly troublesome in Washington state, where the feds control the water supply for two-thirds of the irrigated land. Washington legalized marijuana for recreational use by referendum in November 2012. Turning off the water reportedly won’t impact marijuana production in Colorado to the same extent, because that state’s law only allows indoor growing operations.
According to the McClatchy report, “the ruling makes clear that the Obama administration is willing to set limits on the states’ legalization experiments, even though the Justice Department said in August that it would not block their plans to tax and sell the drug.”
So, now we can count the U.S. federal government as the biggest supporter of withholding water to effect political change.
The feds have tried just about everything else to stop the spread of marijuana legalization at the state level.
The federal government prohibits marijuana for any purpose. But that hasn’t stopped states from simply ignoring the so-called “federal law” and moving ahead with their own policy on cannabis. In addition to legalization for recreational use in Colorado and Washington, 21 states have legal medical marijuana programs. In an attempt to crush this movement and impose their will, the feds have tried heavy handed raids, they’ve threatened lawsuits and they’ve targeted owners of property hosting marijuana businesses. All of their efforts have failed. So now they want to turn off the water.
This unorthodox move by the federal government validates the OffNow strategy. When the normal approaches fail, find other means to put on pressure to bring about the desired results.
The OffNow coalition did just that. When we look at the usual approaches to stopping NSA spying, we see nothing but abject failure. Americans have tired federal lawsuits. They’ve tried begging federal politicians. They put their faith in congressional reform only to see it gutted. They’ve pinned their hopes on a different president who would repeal the Patriot Act and AUMF, roots of NSA spying. And yet the agency continues to collect data, listen in on phone calls and tap into your Internet.
Recognizing the futility of the traditional Washington D.C. solutions, members of the OffNow coalition got together to find a different way. As they began researching NSA spying, they found an Achilles Heel in Utah.
Once fully operational, officials estimate the Bluffdale, Utah data collection facility will use some 1.7 million gallons of water per day to cool its super spy computers. The city supplies that water. With the passage of legislation denying material support to the NSA in Utah, the state can turn it off. No water means no computers, and that puts a huge dent in the agency’s drive to spy on pretty much everybody in the world.
We were pretty confident this approach could put a dent in in the spy machine, but we never expected the feds to follow our lead.
But hey, we appreciate the validation.

http://offnow.org/2014/06/03/feds-validate-offnow-plan-shut-water/