PDA

View Full Version : SUBUD and the Octopus of the Deep State



Lauren Johnson
03-21-2019, 03:37 PM
The following are a series of posts (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3105860) from 4chan and are therefore to be read with skepticism. The anon author quotes from Wayne Madsen, Douglas Valentine, and others. I think these posts are worth a look. Here is Part One with six more to follow.

In this post I want to focus on the Subud cult, a bizarre little religious group that originated from Indonesia in the 1920s.According to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subud), Subud has about 10,000 members worldwide, and began as a “spiritual movement” that was the brainchild of Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo, an Indonesian “spiritual guru” also known as “Bapak.” Supposedly, the whole basis of the Subud “movement” Bapak created, was “.. a spiritual practice called latihan kejiwaan, which was said by “Bapak” to represent guidance from “the Power of God” or “the Great Life Force.”” Whatever the real practices of this group might be, according to Wikipedia, the Subud group is small, but appears highly structured and to have a global presence, with members in 83 countries.
What got me really started on looking Subud, was a book by independent investigator Wayne Madsen. Madsen is a former Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) and NSA intelligence analyst. He wrote a book called “The Manufacturing of a President: The CIA’s insertion of Barack Obama, JR. into the White House.” In the book, Madsen goes into a ton of detail about Barack Obama, and the Obama family’s, deep deep connections to the intelligence world. In particular, Madsen looks at Obama’s whole family’s strong ties to the CIA, and to elite foundations like the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, and the elite families behind the foundation world and intelligence world (quite often “overlapping worlds,” so to speak.)
In particular, Madsen researched the Subud cult. Madsen says that Subud “…became popular in Indonesia and internationally following World War II, [and] attracted as adherents a few Western intelligence operatives assigned to Indonesia.” According to Madsen, Barack Obama’s own mother Ann Dunham, had a number of connections to the Subud group, while she herself was in Indonesia working for the Ford Foundation in the 1970s and 80s. As Madsen documents, during this period, Ann Dunham was quite possibly involved in covert operations on behalf of the CIA, with her work for the foundation serving as a cover. As Madsen states:
“Ann [Dunham] maintained close connections with [Subud]. Ann first encountered Subud members while working for the Institute for Management and Education and Development, while under a grant from the Ford Foundation, in 1971. She hired members of Subud […] to teach intensive courses in business English. Given her residence in Semarang [Indonesia], Bapak’s hometown and base, from 1978 to 1980, it is inconceivable that Ann was unaware of Bapak and his movement.”
What little is known about Subud, understandably seems to be focused on Obama and his family’s ties to the group. To be clear, Madsen documents a number of significant connections between the Obama’s and Subud that are worth looking into, but Madsen also basically says he is unable to prove, one way or the other, if Ann Dunham or any other of the Obamas were themselves members of Subud, despite the significant personal connections they had to the group. I definitely recommend Madsen’s “The Manufacturing of a President”, if you are looking for more info in this area.
However, for the purpose of a Pizzagate post, I want to focus this piece on looking specifically at Subud’s connections to the extremely dark world of child sex trafficking, ritual abuse, and covert mind control operations run by the elites directing “our” Intelligence Agencies and Military-Industrial Establishment.
Subud and the Intelligence World
As Madsen said, Subud started attracting as members some Western intelligence operatives after WWII, but the group’s connections to the intelligence world appear to run much deeper. As Madsen also states, “Bapak and his Subud followers were also well-entrenched at the East-West Center at the University of Hawaii, where Ann [Dunham, Barack’s mother] met her Kenyan and Indonesian husbands.”
It’s very interesting to hear that Subud was apparently “well-entrenched” at the East -West Center of the University of Hawaii? (does this mean a lot of faculty, students, or both were Subud members?). The East-West Center is a large and well-established academic program at the University of Hawaii, located on a 21-acre campus next to the University of Hawaii campus. It was founded by Congress in 1960, and according to the East-West Center website (https://www.eastwestcenter.org/), its mission is to promote “… better relations and understanding among the people and nations of the United States, Asia, and the Pacific through cooperative study, research, and dialogue.”
Considering the Subud group’s allegedly large presence at this “East-Center Center” academic program, I should point out that CIA researcher Doug Valentine specifically documents The East-West Center as acting, at least in part, as a front for CIA covert operations, in his 2017 book “The CIA as Organized Crime.” (Please also see my previous post (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2712717) about Doug Valentine’s research and its relevance to the “Franklin Scandal” child abuse and trafficking scandal in the 80s.)
In “The CIA as Organized Crime,” Doug Valentine talks about Frank Scotton, a CIA operative who was recruited and trained by the CIA and was sent on assassination missions in the jungles of Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos during the Vietnam War. When Valentine talked to Frank Scotton, Scotton told him directly that the East-West Center functioned as a front for CIA activities. As Valentine writes:
Scotton did, however, acknowledge the CIA-sponsored East-West Center’s espionage function. “It was a cover for a training program in which Southeast Asians were brought to Hawaii and trained to go back to Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos to create agent nets,” [Frank Scotton] said.
Doug Valentines’ information makes you seriously wonder what Subud member’s role may have been in all of this. Were Subud members amongst the students at the East-West Center who were recruited by the CIA and sent back to Southeast Asia as CIA-sponsored espionage agents? These connections suggest that Subud members themselves may have been directly involved in CIA covert operations.
Wayne Madsen points out more evidence that suggests that Subud may have functioned as a front for CIA-sponsored covert operations for quite some time. In the 1960s, the President of Indonesia was Sukarno. Sukarno was a left-leaning leader who was accused by the West of being allied with the communists, and in the late 1960s he was overthrown in a CIA-supported coup that brought the Western-backed dictator Suharto to power. Estimates are that between half a million and a million Communist party members were killed in Indonesia, as part of the extremely violent, CIA-supported coup.
Sukarno’s top ally, his foreign minister Dr. Subandrio, very publicly distrusted the Subud group, banning them from public meetings. The Communist Party of Indonesia (PKI), accused Subud as being a CIA front. As Madsen writes, Subud founder “…. Bapak issued orders to his non-Indonesian members to leave the country before the coup and told foreign members abroad not to enter the country. When Suharto ousted Sukarno and declared the PKI illegal, Bapak celebrated the change, proclaiming that Indonesia was free of the Communists.” In another instance, in 1959 the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka, Solomon Bandaranaike, was assassinated by a Buddhist monk. Apparently, the Sri Lankan Prime Minister was allied with the Communist Party and was against the West, obviously attracting the anger of the CIA. The Sri Lankan Prime Minister was murdered shortly after ordering Subud leader Bapak to leave the country, and as Madsen writes, many believe the CIA may have been behind his assassination.

Lauren Johnson
03-21-2019, 03:38 PM
The “Subud” Cult, and Connections Child Trafficking, Ritual Abuse, and CIA Mind Control Covert Operations
Considering the significant connections between Subud and covert intelligence operations going back possibly decades, its horrifying to learn that there is evidence linking members of the Subud cult to child sex trafficking and ritual abuse. As Wayne Madsen writes in “Manufacturing a President”:
“There were reports that some child members of [Subud] were also involved in the horrific sex abuse case at the McMartin pre-school day care center in Manhattan Beach, California in the 1980s. The McMartin pedophile ring was linked to members of the military, Los Angeles Police Department, and the U.S. intelligence community.”
Independent investigator Alex Constantine did some, in my opinion, important research into the McMartin abuse scandal, which he wrote about in this article “McMartin Preschool Revisited” here (http://www.whale.to/b/constantine3.html), and in his article (https://www.stopeg.com/tinet.nl/public/browse-online/raven1-eleanor-white/mcf/cnst-nws.htm) “Time Machine: Muffled Screams, Singed Synapses.” In particular to McMartin, I also highly recommend author David Mcgowan’s book “Programmed to Kill: The Politics of Serial Murder,” where he goes into extensive detail about the McMartin case, and the horrific evidence of suspicious deaths, judicial corruption, and more pointing towards a cover-up of ritual abuse and child sex trafficking in that case. In his McMartin articles, Alex Constantine quotes the research of, and interviews, Dr. Catherine Gould, an LA-area child therapist. Ritual abuse survivor Brice Taylor, in her book “Thanks for the Memories,” specifically credits Dr. Catherine Gould for saving her life. She claims that Dr. Gould played a major role in helping her escape and stay free from the elite trafficking ring that Brice Taylor alleged she was abused and controlled by.
In his “Time Machine” article, Constantine links the Subud group directly to the ritual abuse and mind control experimentation alleged to have been happening at the McMartin school in the 80s and possibly before. Constantine writes:
“The McMartin mind control experiments were reportedly the work of Subud, a religious sect with roots in Indonesia and the UK, according to confidential informants (active members who submitted to injections of sodium pentathol before questioning.)”
Wayne Madsen also reports that the Subud group has links to CIA-run mind control programs: “Other critics have pointed to the connections between the Subud movement, and CIA mind control operations, especially those directed at children and others that administer sodium pentothal to unwitting subjects.”
I’m sure people are wondering, amongst many other things, why these heinous, and clearly extremely “black op”-type covert activities would be hidden away within some obscure little religious cult from Indonesia, with a current membership of only 10,000 people. Interestingly, Alex Constantine makes the argument that back in the 60s, the CIA started to fear public exposure of its covert mind control operations. (Obviously, CIA-run mind control experiments being run on presumably unwitting and unwilling adults and children, is obvious inherently a humans right abuse of highest order) According to Constantine, in order to better hide these kind of operations, the Agency basically started to hide the mind control programs in a bunch of seemingly-“random” front groups that were scattered all over the world. Constantine describes Subud as being one of these CIA front groups used by Agency to continue its mind control experimentations and operations. Constantine writes:
“In the mid-'60s, the technological oligarchs of the Agency feared exposure. Newspaper reporters had caught wind of Auschwitzian behavioral modification research funded by the government. Congress was asking questions. The thugs at Langley scratched their heads. It was only a matter of time before some inquisitive reporter exposed the rot of mind control. The solution: CIA scientists bugged out of the laboratory. The experiments were moved into the community.
Eccentric religious groups were organized or co-opted by intelligence operators, including the Peoples' Temple, the Symbionese Liberation Army, the Ordo Templis Orientis (OTO), Finders, the Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh Movement and Switzerland's Solar Temple, among others. In 1966 Charles Buckey built a preschool in Manhattan Beach, California. Buckey was an engineer at Hughes Aircraft. This was a period when everyone said, "Hughes is the CIA."
The McMartin mind control experiments were reportedly the work of Subud, a religious sect with roots in Indonesia and the UK, according to confidential informants (active members who submitted to injections of sodium pentothal before questioning).
The cult is a cut-out of the American security elite's mind control fraternity. One of Subud's leading lights is Janet Morris, a science fiction writer and charter member of the Association for Electronic Defense. She is also research director of the U.S. Global Strategy Council, a Washington "think tank" founded by ultra-conservatives Claire Booth Luce, General Maxwell Taylor, General Richard Stillwell, former CIA Deputy Director Ray Cline, and the abrasive Jeane Kirkpatrick, among others.
Another prominent member of the Subud sect is an executive of a major toy company - a leading maker of virtual-reality computer games for children, like the ones used by CIA scientists to traumatize young subjects.”

Lauren Johnson
03-21-2019, 03:40 PM
Just to give a bit of perspective, Clair Booth Luce, who Alex Constantine names as being connected to this “elite mind control fraternity,” was herself the longtime wife of Henry Luce, publisher of “Time”, “Life”, “Fortune”, and “Sports Illustrated”. So if researchers like Wayne Madsen and Alex Constantine are right, some of the elites at the very top of these mind control and child abuse operations, are people like the Luce’s, who just happen to own some of the biggest magazines in the country and obviously have an unbelievably powerful role in shaping public opinion. This starts to give you a sense of the elite levels from which these kind of mind control operations are possibly conceived, and then spread out through society.
Again, if researchers like Madsen and Constantine are correct, their research suggests that these mind control/child abuse-related operations are not haphazard operations, but are extremely hierarchical, carefully organized and directed from high levels. This immediately makes me think of Clinical Psychologist Dr. Corydon Hammond’s “The Greenbaum Speech.” (See my previous post on Voat about the “Greenbaum Speech” for the details, I do think it’s well worth reading) (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2042045). Dr. Corydon Hammond is a Clinical Psychologist at the University of Utah, and in 1992 he gave a speech about mind control and ritual abuse to a professional conference of therapists in Alexandria, VA. The speech he gave has become known as the “Greenbaum Speech.” (link to speech (http://www.whale.to/b/greenbaum.html), and Youtube audio recording of the speech
YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FUersarZuo&t=1s)). Dr. Hammond has a long clinical background using hypnotherapy to treat patients with multiple personal disorder, or dissociative identity disorder (DID). His resume clearly shows he has a deep background in psychology and hypnosis, amongst many other credentials, he was the President of the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis, a major professional organization of therapists who use hypnosis to treat patients.
In his “Greenbaum” speech, Dr. Hammond describes how he treated a lot of patients with DID who claimed to be victims of ritual abuse. He also apparently knew an informal network of other therapists in other parts of the country, who were treating DID patients also claiming to be ritualistically abused. Based on his treatment of ritual abuse patients, and hearing from other therapists doing the same, Dr. Hammond describes in detail, how he apparently discovered evidence of a very widespread and insidious network of abuse perpetrators inflicting abuse on child victims in multiple parts of the US, and even internationally. He says that these abuse perpetrators were systematically using ritual abuse and mind control techniques, to deliberately traumatize their child victims and split their minds into multiple personalities, or “alters,” (split personalities are often referred to as “alters”).
Furthermore, as heinous as this is, Dr. Hammond says that based on his knowledge, this network of ritual abuse/mind control perpetrators was systematic enough in their abuse, that they would use trauma and mind control to instill the same kind of “alters” or multiple personalities, into different child victims, even child victims who didn’t know each other and lived in different parts of the country, or even the world. In the speech, he talks about working with multiple ritual abuse victims who (despite being different people), all claimed to have suffered the same kind of abuse, and all claimed to have the same basic kind of “alter” personalities instilled into them through this abuse. For some unknown reason, these “alter” personalities seen in different ritual abuse victims, were apparently all identified (for some unknown reason) by letters of the Greek alphabet (alpha, beta, delta, etc.)
The reason I bring all of this up, is because Dr. Corydon Hammond very specifically describes a ritual abuse/mind control network that is both insidiously spread out covertly throughout society, and yet also very hierarchal, with clearly defined leaderships at both national and even international levels. Constantine and Madsen describe the Subud cult, and the ritual abuse and mind control they allegedly perpetrate, as basically fitting into a larger network of CIA and Intelligence-sponsored mind control programs. Very much matching Dr. Hammond’s description of an alleged mind control/ritual abuse network, Constantine describes this CIA-sponsored network of mind control programs as being very insidiously spread out covertly throughout society. And also like Dr. Hammond, Constantine describes this network as being very hierarchical and ultimately controlled by some of the most powerful figures in the military, business, and media establishment.
As eerie as it is to think, are all these folks essentially talking about one and the same thing? Does the Subud cult itself fit into this network of ritual abuse and mind control that Dr. Hammond describes in his “Greenbaum Speech?” I know these are unanswered questions, but definitely ones I think worth bringing up.

Lauren Johnson
03-21-2019, 03:42 PM
I’m sure folks know about the famous Arquette acting family: David, Patricia, Alexis, Rosanna and Richmond Arquette are all pretty well-known Hollywood actors, and all are the children of Hollywood actor Lewis Arquette. The Arquette family literally goes back generations in the Hollywood film industry, the 5 Arquette children’s’ great-grandparents were Vaudeville-era actors. As crazy as it may be to know, apparently the Arquette family are also deeply connected to Subud. In this 1995 New York Times article (https://www.nytimes.com/1995/08/20/movies/none-of-that-sultry-innocence-for-a-change.html) about Patricia Arquette, (star of movies like “True Romance” and “Beyond Rangoon”), the article states: “The Arquette children were raised on a “Subud” commune in Virginia. (Subudism, says Lewis Arquette, is a “nonsectarian fellowship, originating in Indonesia, that fosters meditation.”
Strangely enough, the NY Times article describes actor Patricia Arquette as “…playing roles that emphasize her amalgam of sex-kitten and cracked innocence.” Also, it describes Patricia Arquette going through extremely difficult teenage years: “At age 12, she was arrested for shop-lifting. At 14, she shaved her head and ran away to live with Rosanna. At age 19 she became pregnant by a musician.” As I’m sure many are aware on this forum, shaving your head is an act often connected to mind control-related abuse by some researchers, and Britney Spear’s well-known head shaving incident is often attributed to some kind of mind control programming breakdown. To be clear, I don’t know any more about Patricia Arquette’s head shaving incident other than what the article says, but considering her background literally growing up on a Subud-owned property, one has to wonder.
Even more bizarrely, I found this other article (https://books.google.com/books?id=lF0EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA34&lpg=PA34&dq=patricia+arquette+los+angeles+magazine+mcmartin&source=bl&ots=3N96pNKxDS&sig=ACfU3U1lVk44hty4rYPqCNqcUq_4ZeBVkA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwikmt_ewo7hAhUGON8KHfobDUwQ6AEwCHoECAQQA Q#v=onepage&q=patricia%20arquette%20los%20angeles%20magazine%2 0mcmartin&f=false) about Patricia Arquette and her movie career in a 2005 edition of “Los Angeles” magazine, a very mainstream Southern California “lifestyle”-type magazine. The article is basically a “puff piece” about the movies and TV shows Patty Arquette was starring in at the time. However, mid-way through the article, which describes the author’s one-on-one interview with Patricia Arquette, (and you can’t make this up), you find out this horrifying and bizarrely-written information about Patricia Arquette from the author of the piece. To quote directly from the article:
“In person, Arquette is warmer and earthier, more bohemian than ingenue; she has motherly curves and crooked teeth, unpainted nails and a tangle of blond hair. For the occasion, she wore a faded T-shirt that proclaimed her a graduate of McMartin Preschool, the Manhattan Beach day care center that during the 1980s was at the center of horrific (and later discredited) tales of ritual abuse. “If I did go, I guess that would explain my level of damage,” said Arquette […] “It’s a bad and foul joke.”
So what the hell are we supposed to make of this?? If Patricia Arquette is denying she ever went to McMartin preschool as a kid, or if she was giving some kind bizarre “non-denial denial,” so to speak, about McMartin, we can’t be sure. But regardless, for what earthly reason would she wear a t-shirt that says “McMartin Preschool” during an interview for some mainstream magazine, in 2005?? Are we supposed to think it’s some kind of sick joke? The article doesn’t explain Arquette’s bizarre behavior at all, leaving only unanswered questions. Sure enough though, right after the bizarre reference to McMartin in the article, the author goes on to describe Patricia Arquette’s deep personal connection to…. Subud:
“What does explain Arquette is a childhood spent at Skymont, a Virginia commune that her parents helped settle on the banks of the Shenandoah River. Her father, Lewis, and her mother Mardiningsih, a poet and therapist, were followers of Subud, a spiritual movement founded by Indonesian prophet Pak Subuh…”
The article completely backs up the NY Times article about the Arquette kids growing up on a Subud property. Investigator Wayne Madsen in his “Manufacturing a President” also describes the Subud-owned “Skymont” compound in Virginia, which is located in Front Royal, Virginia, interestingly-enough only a little over an hour’s drive from Langley, VA, home of CIA headquarters. If Patricia Arquette’s father and mother were the ones who actually founded a major Subud compound near DC, presumably they must not just be members, but pretty significant leaders within Subud, whatever that might mean.

Lauren Johnson
03-21-2019, 03:44 PM
Considering that the 5 Arquette kids literally grew up on a Subud compound, according to completely mainstream sources, I think it’s time to turn attention to another of the Arquette kids who also grew up on the Subud compound: Alexis Arquette. Alexis Arquette (formerly Robert Arquette), was an actor like the rest of the Arquette’s, and was a transgender activist who received sex reassignment surgery and identified as female. Alexis died in 2016, according to the official story, from a cardiac arrest that was attributed to her poor health due to being HIV-positive.
As I’m sure a lot of people on this subverse know, there was a Crazy Days and Nights (CDAN) blind post (https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/07/blind-items-revealed-40.html) back in July 2018, (link here to a Voat post (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2620180)about it) claiming to link the suspicious death of human trafficking investigator Monica Petersen to Alexis Arquette, as well as to Chris Cornell. For those who don’t know, Monica Petersen worked as a researcher for the Human Trafficking Center (HTC) at the University of Denver, one of the few graduate programs in the country that focuses on researching human trafficking. According to her own obituary, Monica also had a Masters degree from the Josef Korbel School of International Studies, also at the University of Denver. (See this Voat thread for the most comprehensive research thread I could find on Voat about Peterson’s death) (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1428193). Monica Petersen was in Haiti in 2016, when according to the December 2016 Washington Post article about Petersen’s death, she was working as an English teacher and “…committed suicide but the circumstances weren’t clear.” The WaPo article attributes the statement that Petersen’s death was due to suicide, specifically to the Director of the Human Trafficking Center, Claude D’Estree. However, there have been many claims that Petersen’s death was due to her investigation of a human trafficking ring in Haiti, specifically a child sex trafficking ring.
I think it’s worth digging into the major claims made in the CDAN blind about Monica Petersen/Alexis Arquette/ Chris Cornell:
According to the CDAN blind, Monica Petersen along with her NGO (presumably the Human Trafficking Center (HTC) at U of Denver), were asked by the FBI to investigate a child sex ring. Monica Petersen was herself apparently getting multiple “tips” about men involved with this alleged child sex ring. This alleged child sex ring, which Monica was supposedly receiving information about, allegedly produced huge amounts of child porn for the Dark Web. And supposedly the ring was responsible for producing (recently, at least as of 2016) the 50,000 images of child pornography that Glee-actor Mark Salling got arrested for. This was before Salling’s own death after his arrest, officially by hanging.
For reasons not explained in the CDAN blind, the investigation (being led presumably by members of the FBI, Monica Petersen, and possibly other HTC members) into this child sex ring, lead to Alexis Arquette as some kind “person of interest.” Alexis Arquette very much wanted to help the investigators, and told them about an unnamed former romantic partner, another Hollywood actor.
Alexis Arquette told investigators that this former romantic partner bragged to her about having access to kids for making child porn. Supposedly, Alexis’s unnamed romantic partner also told her the names of other people, who she herself did not know, who were allegedly also involved with this child sex ring (whether they were victims or abusers, is not clear). Alexis Arquette then got in touch with Monica Petersen, who she supposedly was already a long-time personal friend of. Alexis got in touch with Petersen to pass along the names of these people who were all allegedly connected with this child sex ring, to aid Petersen in her investigation. Within a month of doing this, if the CDAN piece is to be believed, Alexis was murdered, and her already-poor health condition due to her HIV-positive status was used as a cover.
According to the blind, Monica Petersen went to Haiti, because Alexis Arquette told her the “people” connected with the alleged child sex ring were located in Haiti. (Again, it is unclear if the “people” mean abusers, victims, or both). Presumably, at least according to the blind, Monica was working with members of the FBI and (possibly) members of the Human Trafficking Center from the University of Denver, during her investigation in Haiti. Petersen supposedly kept backing up the evidence she was gathering in Haiti by sending it to family members out of the country, who then backed up Monica’s info on USB drives. If the blind is to be believed, once in Haiti, Petersen started to seriously investigate and ask questions about the alleged child sex ring. Shortly after, Monica was then allegedly murdered because of it. Petersen officially passed away Nov. 13th, 2016 in Port-Au-Prince, Haiti.
A few months after Monica Petersen’s death, Chris Cornell was apparently in touch with an unnamed woman who had some kind of (unexplained) personal connection with Monica Petersen. This unnamed woman supposedly was in touch with Petersen right up until before her death. She also was in possession of a USB drive containing at least some of the evidence Petersen had been sending out of the country, as part of her alleged investigation in Haiti. The unnamed woman claimed to Chris Cornell, that one of the last things Monica wrote about before her death, related directly to Chris Cornell. This unnamed woman was supposedly living in the same town where Petersen was living before her trip to Haiti. Since Petersen was working in Denver, at the University of Denver, as a researcher for the HTC right before her trip to Haiti (at least as late as June 2016 according to the WaPo article about Petersen’s death), I would assume the town the woman was living in, would have to be Denver or somewhere in the surrounding area.
Again, according to the blind, the unnamed woman, presumably living in Denver, offered to give Chris Cornell the actual USB drive with Monica Petersen’s investigative info, presumably including the info related directly to him. Chris Cornell allegedly told the unnamed woman that he would be in (presumably, Denver), “in a couple weeks”, and that he could pick up Monica’s USB drive from the unnamed woman then. A couple days before he could go to meet the unnamed woman, Chris Cornell was then allegedly murdered. Chris Cornell died on May 18th, 2017 (only about 6 months after Monica’s death), officially also due to suicide from hanging, in a hotel room in Detroit.

Lauren Johnson
03-21-2019, 03:46 PM
So that is the CDAN blind, as least as best as I can explain it. As I’m sure folks realize, there is no way you can confirm or deny something like a CDAN post (https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/07/blind-items-revealed-40.html) other than trying to find corroborating information else where. But as I’m sure many folks here might know, the most definitive evidence I could find, outside the CDAN blind, that Monica Petersen actually was in Haiti investigating some kind of human trafficking, is a Jan. 2016 Facebook post shared by Bella Robinson, who is a Rhode Island-area sex worker and sex worker rights advocate, and was a confirmed friend of Monica Petersen, according to the same Washington article by WaPO reporter Glenn Kessler.
In the January 4th, 2016 post shared by Bella Robinson on Facebook, Bella claims to be sharing a report from Monica Petersen, who supposedly was in Haiti at the time. The 2016 WaPo article, does in fact confirm that Monica did visit Haiti “… a number of times.” (You can see multiple postings of Bella’s Jan. 2016 Facebook post embedded on this other Voat thread about the Petersen investigation) (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1428193). According to Bella’s post, Monica reported that she was actively investigating the Clinton’s ongoing deep ties to corruption in Haiti, in particular the Clinton’s family’s shady links to the Morne Bossa mine in the north of Haiti. The Morne Bossa mine is located right next to the Clinton Foundation-sponsored Caracol Industrial Complex (i.e textile sweatshop), near Cap Hatien in Northern Haiti. Again, according to Bella’s post on Facebook, Monica claimed in her “travel update”-type report:
“..the real significance of this scandal for me, I know you feel me Bella, is the link to contemporary slavery and trafficking. I can’t say to what extent, but there is human trafficking happening through the Clinton’s Caraol [sic] Complex. And mining has always been historically linked to trafficking, slavery, and labor exploitation.”
This Facebook post was clearly only shared by Bella to her own little group of friends back in January 2016, well before Monica’s death and before all this became news.
In the Dec. 2016 Washington Post article (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/12/06/another-false-pizzagate-tale-the-death-of-a-sex-worker-activist-in-haiti/?utm_term=.86ab79b19f3b) about Monica’s death, written by WaPo reporter Glenn Kessler, Bella Robinson is interviewed. The entire focus of Kessler’s article, from start to finish, is a debunking job against the supposed “conspiracy theories” about Monica’s death. In the WaPo article, Bella denies that Monica’s trip to Haiti had anything at all to do with investigating human trafficking. However, in the very same article, Kessler claims that Bella herself was the one who started the supposed Monica Petersen “conspiracy theories.” According to Kessler’s WaPo article:
“An acquaintance named Bella Robinson, a sex worker and activist in Rhode Island, in January had posted a blog post that Petersen had shared on Facebook that had been critical of the Clinton Foundation’s work in Haiti. Shortly after Petersen’s death, the blog post appeared in a Reddit discussion thread. This then resulted in a flurry of “news stories” falsely claiming that Petersen had written the blog post and was killed for investigating the Clintons.”
The blog post (https://imgur.com/TmiB2gU) linked to from the WaPo article, containing Bella’s posts about Petersen, is in fact a random imgur image hosting website with screenshots of posts from Bella, Monica Petersen, the Human Trafficking Center, and the “Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking.” The imgur site linked to from the WaPo article, does in fact contain one of Bella’s posts quoting Monica Petersen’s investigation into the Clintons in Haiti. However, the imgur site linked to by the WaPo article, does not contain the specific Facebook post (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1428193) from Jan. 2016 by Bella Robinson, in which Monica Petersen specifically alleges that there is human trafficking happening at the Clinton-sponsored Caracol sweatshop in Haiti. So how can Kessler dismiss the whole thing as “false reporting” about Monica and Bella’s posts, when he himself is not being truthful about what Bella actually said about Monica’s reporting from Haiti??
Furthermore, I honestly think we catch Kessler in a straight-up lie in his WaPo article about Monica’s death. In the article, Kessler cites an Alex Jone’s Youtube video, and cites the Alex Jones video as claiming that Monica’s life “was cut short” specifically because of her investigation into the Clinton’s Caracol sweatshop and its connections to human trafficking. Kessler himself specifically says that Alex Jones’s claim about Petersen investigating the Caracol sweatshop is “false.” Again, how can Kessler claim this is false, when he never once addresses Bella Robinson’s actual Jan. 2016 Facebook post (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1428193), where she herself posts Monica’s claim that Caracol is a site for human trafficking??
In the article, Kessler never asks the critical question of whether there is any substantial evidence that Monica was investigating anything related to human trafficking at the time of her death in Haiti in 2016. I wonder if this is because if he did ask that question, he would have to address the existence of Bella’s post about Monica, the Caracol Complex, and alleged trafficking occurring there? In my opinion at least, I think Kessler seems to be trying to be pull a misdirection-type trick, by dismissing the Caracol-related allegations because “crazy old Alex Jones” is talking about it on Youtube. (I’m personally inclined to think Jones could be functioning as some kind of disinfo agent himself, but I definitely don’t want to go down that insane rabbit hole here lol).

Lauren Johnson
03-21-2019, 03:50 PM
Taken together, all of this strikes me as attempts at selective disinformation and intentional misdirection on Kessler’s part, to say the least. Again, Bella Robinson, in the same WaPo article (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/12/06/another-false-pizzagate-tale-the-death-of-a-sex-worker-activist-in-haiti/?utm_term=.86ab79b19f3b), is quoted as saying that Monica’s death “had nothing to do with the Clinton scandal.” So is Bella specifically disavowing her own previous Facebook post, which contains Monica’s report about Caracol and human trafficking? We have no way of knowing, because Kessler never once addresses Bella’s actual Facebook post.
One thing I am willing to say personally: in my own investigation into this, I have had some very limited private correspondence with Bella, which I am definitely NOT willing to go into any detail about (we know some mutual people, and beyond that I unfortunately I’m not willing to say more). However, I can confirm, at least in my very limited online conversation with her, that Bella still says that Monica’s death has nothing to do with the Clinton’s or human trafficking. However, I got the impression that Bella was very very irritated and stand-offish to even be talking about the subject, and given the context of our limited conversation, I didn’t want to press her by asking about her specifically about her Jan. 2016 Facebook post. Beyond that, unfortunately I could not confirm anything, one way or the other, in my own limited interaction with Bella.
Is it possibly Bella was intimidated, or dissuaded in some way from talking about this subject?? I have no way of knowing one way or the other, but it is all unbelievably fishy. And here is where it gets even stranger. One thing I immediately noticed when I did a Google news search on “Monica Petersen.” Glenn Kessler’s Washington Post article (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/12/06/another-false-pizzagate-tale-the-death-of-a-sex-worker-activist-in-haiti/?utm_term=.86ab79b19f3b) about Monica Petersen was literally the only mainstream new article about Monica’s death I could find anywhere. I mean anywhere. I could not find another article about Monica’s death from any other “mainstream” news agency, other than the WaPo. (If I’m wrong about this, please tell me). I couldn’t even find an article in the Denver Post, Monica’s hometown paper, about her death. Just looking at the absolute absence of any other mainstream reporting about Monica’s death, I can’t help but feel that there has to be some kind of orchestrated “clamp-down” on information in regards to Monica Petersen’s death.
I also feel it is worth it to point out a few things about Glenn Kessler, the author of apparently the only article about Monica’s death coming from any mainstream news source pretty much anywhere. It may interest folks to learn that according to Kessler’s own Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Kessler_(journalist)), in his duties as a reporter, Kessler personally travelled with Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State, along with past Secretaries of State Condeleeza Rice and Colin Powell, “and for several years wrote a blog about those trips.” Kessler is also a longtime member of the Council of Foreign Relations and is the grandson of an extremely wealthy Dutch steel magnate, and great-grandson of one of the main founders of Royal Dutch Shell. In addition, Kessler was himself personally involved in more than one major foreign policy controversy, including the Valerie Plame affair, when the Bush Administration publicly outed the identity of CIA agent Valerie Plame. Kessler was involved in the Congressional hearings into the Plame controversy; apparently Kessler testified that he had a personal phone conversation with “Scooter” Libby himself, the top Bush Administration official who was convicted for leaking the identity of Valerie Plame. “Scooter” Libby claimed he talked about Valerie Plame with Kessler; Kessler denied talking about Valerie Plame in his conversation with Libby. By all indications, Kessler was both a major insider to the Bush Administration, and also an insider to Hilary’s inner circle when she was Secretary of State.
Whatever this all means, who the hell knows. But it is interesting to say the least, that pretty much the only mainstream news reporter who covered Monica’s death, and who arguably wrote a massive piece of disinfo about it, is himself so deeply connected to elitist circles, that amongst other things, he was the personal travel companion to Hillary Clinton herself while she was Secretary of State!! Nothing to see hear, right??
Getting Back to Subud: Haitian Trafficking Ring Investigation, Monica Petersen, Alexis Arquette and the CDAN Blind Post
So if the CDAN blind post about Monica and Haiti (https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/07/blind-items-revealed-40.html) is in anyway true, obviously there are tons of unanswered questions. However, one major unanswered question in my mind is: what was it specifically about Alexis Arquette’s own particular background that made her a “person of interest” in this alleged investigation by (presumably) Monica Petersen and members of the FBI, in the first place? So in this regard, we have Alexis Arquette’s actually documented, deep family and personal connections to Subud. And through Subud, we are back into the world of major allegations of child abuse, ritual abuse, and elite-directed mind control operations.
If the CDAN post is to be believed, Alexis was eager to tell investigators what she knew about the alleged child sex ring right off the bat. This strikes me as the action of someone who might be a former victim themselves. Considering Alexis’s background of literally being raised, along with her brothers and sisters, on some kind of Subud-owned property, and the bizarre behavior of her sister Patricia freakishly wearing a “McMartin Pre-school” shirt to a magazine interview, of course there are more questions.
Were Alexis and/or her siblings ever victim to these terrible abuses attributed to Subud? Were they trafficked or ritualistically abused? Taking this a step further, if this is at all true, is it possible that Alexis became a person of interest in Monica Petersen and the FBI’s alleged investigation into the Haitian child sex ring, because of her background growing up being victimized by child abuse rings run through Subud? Growing up in such a trafficking ring, would obviously mean Alexis would personally know both victims and perpetrators within that trafficking ring. Again, if the blind is true, could Alexis’s first-hand knowledge of some kind of Subud-connected child abuse/trafficking ring, be what made her a “person of interest” to the investigators?
Does this potentially mean a possible overlap between Subud, or certain abuse perpetrators within Subud, and the perpetrators responsible for the alleged Haiti-based child sex ring Monica was supposedly investigating? Since Monica clearly did believe Caracol was a site for human trafficking (according to Bella’s own post (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1428193)), could Subud, or perpetrators somehow associated with Subud, be involved with this alleged human trafficking operation at Caracol?
Obviously there are way more questions than answers. I know there has already been discussion on Voat about this CDAN blind, I didn’t see anyone really exploring Subud specifically, and the cult’s connections to so many of these alleged horrors. Looking at Subud, you see one tiny group (again, only 10,000 members) whose exposure may serve as a “gateway” of sorts, to exposing the covert intelligence mind control programs and child abuse rings that may be way more insidious and pervasive in our world than we have thought possible. And as tragic as it is, it may be that Monica, Alexis, and Chris Cornell, in their own ways, lost their lives because of their attempt to expose elements of this “Octopus”. I definitely think more exploring of Subud, and its ties to Haiti in particular, are really well worth it. Good digging everyone, and stay safe!!