PDA

View Full Version : Good Resouces For 911 Investigation



Peter Lemkin
12-01-2008, 07:14 AM
I thought it might be a good idea to have here [or also in resources] a list of better information sources/resources on 911 and the deception therein and thereafter. An interesting encyclopedic compendia of information related can be downloaded at http://d.scribd.com/docs/24askvkky84jyxz4d8ah.pdf
A very handy timeline can be found at http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project [and they have other interesting timelines on 911 subtopics, such as anthrax and loss of liberties, as well as other deep political stuff]
There are many good books on the subject. Just to mention a few:
Griffin's The New Pearl Harbor, and Debunking 9/11 Debunking
Tarpley's 9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made In The USA
Scott's The Road To 9/11
I'll list some websites later, but a few now:
http://patriotsquestion911.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org/
http://www.911truth.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM [loose change 2nd]
http://s911t.org/
and for some really 'outside of the box thinking' http://www.drjudywood.com/
http://www.v911t.org/
http://www.911exposed.org/index.htm

feel free to add any others....
Jack what is the url of your good website on photo anomalies in the story of 9/11?

Jack White
12-01-2008, 04:27 PM
Peter...the URL is

http://www.911studies.com/

Thanks.

Jack

Peter Lemkin
12-10-2008, 07:28 AM
Oh, and I forgot 9/11 and American Empire - Intellectuals Speak Out by Griffin and Scott. A great gift for someone on your holiday gift list - to pry open the doors of their mind, that first little bit....covers all the subtopics of L'affaire 9/11 with aplumb. One can also hear several of the authors from that book give lectures here from a conference http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15752.htm; and many scholarly articles here http://www.journalof911studies.com/

Peter Lemkin
03-21-2009, 08:48 PM
Just came across another that seems to be aimed at the skeptical and/or conservatives who recoil at anything conspiratorial. It is called 911Proof (http://www.911proof.com/)

Adele Edisen
04-04-2009, 06:18 AM
Peter,

Thank you! This is a list worth keeping.

One of the best videos I have seen is that done by the Architects and Engineers for 911 Trurh, which you listed above:

http://www.ae911truth.org/

These are the builders and designers of the World Trade Center Towers and Buildings. Their explanations of the structural features of the buildings really helps in understanding the crime committed on September 11, 2001.

Adele

Peter Lemkin
04-04-2009, 08:13 AM
Thanks. Far from a complete list - but from those given you can get lists of other books and websites. 911 was the Dallas of the last years. Now the Economic Meltdown is. The three [and the other major deep black ops] need to be exposed to the Public - for ACTION, not just edification, IMO.

Ed Jewett
09-06-2009, 03:05 PM
I'd appreciate others' perspectives on these two web sites:

#1) http://911research.wtc7.net/

including especially
http://911research.wtc7.net/resources/web/psyop.html

and

#2) http://www.oilempire.us/index.html

Jack White
09-06-2009, 06:29 PM
I'd appreciate others' perspectives on these two web sites:

#1) http://911research.wtc7.net/

including especially
http://911research.wtc7.net/resources/web/psyop.html

and

#2) http://www.oilempire.us/index.html

Most 911 websites are a mixture of good and bad...based on the
personal beliefs of the site manager. Most have MUCH GOOD INFORMATION
mixed with opinions too strongly stated. I examined the sites you list.
They are no different. They have much excellent information when they
are stating facts. However, when venturing into opinions and conclusions,
be wary of them as with others. I do not disagree with the facts they
present; however, some of their conclusions do not inspire confidence.
Study the facts and reach your OWN opinions.

Jack

Dawn Meredith
09-06-2009, 08:37 PM
I have found that some of the sites suffer from the same problem one encounters when backed into the corner of "WHO killed JFK?" Personally I take the position that this is the wrong question to ask. The questions to be focussed on are who did not (LHO) together with: why was it done? Who benefitted? what changed, as a result? Why does it matter today?

Once someone gets into venturing opinions as to the whodoneit it's like going down a rabbit hole. I think the same can be said of 9-11.

Does anyone besides me think van Jones was forced to resign today because of his 9-11 view?.