PDA

View Full Version : NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7



Paul Rigby
12-31-2008, 03:56 PM
Chunder & Gross - the incoherent in defence of the preposterous.

Enjoy:

http://visibility911.com/blog/?p=781

David Guyatt
01-02-2009, 09:39 AM
Roll on Part II.

What are the implications of "freefall" of WTC7?

Peter Lemkin
01-02-2009, 09:49 AM
Roll on Part II.

What are the implications of "freefall" of WTC7?

...the implications are democracy, peace, civility, justice & truth in freefall.....

Dawn Meredith
01-02-2009, 02:49 PM
Chunder & Gross - the incoherent in defence of the preposterous.

Enjoy:

http://visibility911.com/blog/?p=781

Thanks Paul. Another excellent website too.
I wish there was some way we could all link to each other.
Every single site on the web devoted to exposing deep political truths
joined together in one common effort: shining light on the truth.
That would give the PTB something to fret about.
Every time I see yet another site like this I realize that our numbers are indeed growing.

Myra Bronstein
01-02-2009, 05:14 PM
Thanks Paul. Another excellent website too.
I wish there was some way we could all link to each other.
Every single site on the web devoted to exposing deep political truths
joined together in one common effort: shining light on the truth.
That would give the PTB something to fret about.
Every time I see yet another site like this I realize that our numbers are indeed growing.

Yeah, after the concept of the Webring fizzled out nothing replaced it, that I'm aware of. So we end up manually creating and maintaining old fashioned Link pages. Not ideal but better than nothing.

Well I'll add this site to our Links page if it's not already there.

Paul Rigby
01-02-2009, 07:10 PM
Roll on Part II.

What are the implications of "freefall" of WTC7?

Foundation structures were simultaneously removed by an external force or mechanism - with explosive implications, not least for NIST's credibility.

Part 2:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XtKLtUiww80

Part 3:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz43hcKYBm4

NIST: “pseudo-science in the service of an on-going cover-up,”

David Chandler.

Myra Bronstein
01-02-2009, 07:38 PM
Paul, do you know if the NIST has ever commented on whether or not a fertilizer bomb could have brought down the federal building in Oklahoma City?

Paul Rigby
01-02-2009, 09:07 PM
Paul, do you know if the NIST has ever commented on whether or not a fertilizer bomb could have brought down the federal building in Oklahoma City?

Do the four names Corley, Thornton, Mlakar and Sozen ring any bells?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Gene_Corley

Paul

David Guyatt
01-03-2009, 11:00 AM
All 3 parts really are very convincing visual evidence of complete bollocks in action... NIST doesn't have a leg to stand on.

It reminds me of Kevin Costner telling the jurors in a court scene how an elephant can hang suspended over the edge of a cliff supported by its tail wrapped around a daisy.

Dawn Meredith
01-03-2009, 03:55 PM
All 3 parts really are very convincing visual evidence of complete bollocks in action... NIST doesn't have a leg to stand on.

It reminds me of Kevin Costner telling the jurors in a court scene how an elephant can hang suspended over the edge of a cliff supported by its tail wrapped around a daisy.

Agreed. It does not get any more in your face than this. Tower 7
was their equivilant of LHO with his old Italian gun with the faulty scope.
Dawn

Myra Bronstein
01-03-2009, 05:24 PM
Do the four names Corley, Thornton, Mlakar and Sozen ring any bells?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Gene_Corley

Paul

They will from now on.
Ok, thanks.

Paul Rigby
01-03-2009, 06:31 PM
Chunder & Gross - the incoherent in defence of the preposterous.

Enjoy:

http://visibility911.com/blog/?p=781

NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY

“…seven year crime spree of global proportions…”