PDA

View Full Version : secrecy news: AT CIA, CLIMATE CHANGE IS A SECRET



Bernice Moore
09-22-2011, 07:46 PM
SECRECY NEWS
from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2011, Issue No. 91
September 22, 2011

Secrecy News Blog: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/


** AT CIA, CLIMATE CHANGE IS A SECRET
** UPDATED CRS REPORTS ON SECRECY


AT CIA, CLIMATE CHANGE IS A SECRET

When the Central Intelligence Agency established a Center on Climate Change and National Security (https://www.cia.gov/news-information/press-releases-statements/center-on-climate-change-and-national-security.html) in 2009, it drew fierce opposition from congressional Republicans who disputed (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2011/01/cias_climate-change_unit_faces.html) the need for an intelligence initiative on this topic. But now there is a different, and possibly better, reason to doubt the value of the Center: It has adopted an extreme view of classification policy which holds that everything the Center does is a national security secret.

Last week, the CIA categorically denied (http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2011/09/cia091311.pdf) (pdf) a request under the Freedom of Information Act for a copy of any Center studies or reports concerning the impacts of global warming.

"We completed a thorough search for records responsive to your request and located material that we determined is currently and properly classified and must be denied in its entirety...," wrote (http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2011/09/cia091311.pdf) CIA's Susan Viscuso to requester Jeffrey Richelson, an intelligence historian affiliated with the National Security Archive.

With some effort, one can imagine records related to climate change that would be properly classified. Such records might, for example, include information that was derived from classified collection methods or sources that could be compromised by their disclosure. Or perhaps such records might present analysis reflecting imminent threats to national security that would be exacerbated rather than corrected by publicizing them.

But that's not what CIA said. Rather, it said that all of the Center's work is classified and there is not even a single study, or a single passage in a single study, that could be released without damage to national security. That's a familiar song, and it became tiresome long ago.

But in this case, it is more than an annoyance. The CIA response indicates a fundamental lack of discernment that calls into question the integrity of the Center on Climate Change, if not the Agency as a whole. If the CIA really thinks (or pretends to think) that every document produced by the Center constitutes a potential threat to national security, who can expect the Center to say anything intelligent or useful about climate change? Security robots cannot help us navigate the environmental challenges ahead. Better to allocate the scarce resources to others who can.

Meanwhile, access by scientists to classified military intelligence data on the environment has actually been improving lately, reports Geoff Brumfiel in the latest edition of Nature ("Military surveillance data: Shared intelligence," (http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110921/full/477388a.html) 21 September 2011, sub. req'd). Among other things, the Clinton-Gore era group of cleared scientists known as MEDEA (Measurements of Earth Data for Environmental Analysis) was reconvened (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/05/science/earth/05satellite.html) in 2008 at congressional request.

A Federation of American Scientists proposal to expand public access to unclassified open source intelligence products ("Open Up Open Source Intelligence," (http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2011/08/open_up_osint.html) Secrecy News, August 24) did not find favor with the White House. Nothing like it was included in the new U.S. National Action Plan (http://www.fas.org/sgp/obama/nap.pdf) (pdf) for the Open Government Partnership, which mostly elaborates and restates previous commitments.


UPDATED CRS REPORTS ON SECRECY

Reports on secrecy-related topics from the Congressional Research Service that are newly updated (but otherwise not new) include these (all pdf).

Criminal Prohibitions on the Publication of Classified Defense Information (http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R41404.pdf), September 8, 2011

Protection of Classified Information by Congress: Practices and Proposals (http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/RS20748.pdf), August 31, 2011

The State Secrets Privilege: Preventing the Disclosure of Sensitive National Security Information During Civil Litigation (http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R41741.pdf), August 16, 2011

Newly updated CRS reports on other topics include these.

Intelligence Issues for Congress (http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/intel/RL33539.pdf), September 14, 2011

The Palestinians: Background and U.S. Relations (http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL34074.pdf), August 30, 2011

U.S. Foreign Aid to the Palestinians (http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RS22967.pdf), August 29, 2011


_______________________________________________
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.

The Secrecy News Blog is at:
http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/

To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/subscribe.html

To UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/unsubscribe.html

OR email your request to saftergood@fas.org

Secrecy News is archived at:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html






Reply to: Reply to saftergood@fas.org
Reply to saftergood@fas.org
Send (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/#)

Peter Lemkin
09-22-2011, 09:38 PM
AT CIA, CLIMATE CHANGE IS A SECRET

When the Central Intelligence Agency established a Center on Climate Change and National Security in 2009, it drew fierce opposition from congressional Republicans who disputed the need for an intelligence initiative on this topic. But now there is a different, and possibly better, reason to doubt the value of the Center: It has adopted an extreme view of classification policy which holds that everything the Center does is a national security secret.

Last week, the CIA categorically denied (pdf) a request under the Freedom of Information Act for a copy of any Center studies or reports concerning the impacts of global warming.

"We completed a thorough search for records responsive to your request and located material that we determined is currently and properly classified and must be denied in its entirety...," wrote CIA's Susan Viscuso to requester Jeffrey Richelson, an intelligence historian affiliated with the National Security Archive.

As an environmental scientist, I find this doubly disturbing as well as absurd...... Other than some information on effects of climate change on secret facilities, I can't imagine what they would know that is not publicly known by the scientific community, in general. That they don't care to share any of it should make people wonder what they are up to. Oh yes, there would be one other category they might not want to talk about...and that would be human produced [on purpose - as a covert operation] climate changes. Not a pretty picture to contemplate. Enough harm being done by human inattention to the effects of regular human activities. Nasty bunch there in CIA - seems it just got a little more nasty and [if possible] more secretive.

Bernice Moore
09-23-2011, 02:48 AM
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/cia-classifies-global-warming-intelligence/



CIA Says Global-Warming Intelligence Is ‘Classified’