• DPF content Licencing

    In general, Content on the Deep Politics Forum site is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 unported license.

    Any exceptions to this general licensing rule are noted on individual articles or other material and the nature of the applicable license or copyright shown.

    Exceptions will occasionally apply to work where the author or originator wishes to retain personal copyright ownership but has provided DPF with permission to publish or otherwise use the work.


    The following is a human-readable summary of the full license linked at the bottom of this explanation:

    You are free:

    • to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work
    • to Remix — to adapt the work

    Under the following conditions:

    • Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).


    • Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same, similar or a compatible license.

    With the understanding that:

    • Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.
    • Public Domain — Where the work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    • Other Rights — In no way are any of the following rights affected by the license:
      • Your fair dealing or fair use rights, or other applicable copyright exceptions and limitations;
      • The author's moral rights;
      • Rights other persons may have either in the work itself or in how the work is used, such as publicity or privacy rights.



    • Notice — For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.

    Full license text here
  • Recent Articles

  • Recent Forum Posts

    Lauren Johnson

    Tosh Plumlee

    Actually, we agree, and you from an insider position. The core of his narrative is "abort." That just doesn't add up. That's all. If you

    Lauren Johnson Today, 07:41 PM Go to last post
    Peter Lemkin

    Tosh Plumlee

    PPfffftt!...... I don't have the energy to answer what I think you are asking at this point. I spent years of my life with him and his story and suffered

    Peter Lemkin Today, 07:29 PM Go to last post
    Alan Ford

    A Thought-Provoking Read

    Thanks for sharing this gem, Mr. DiEugenio, what an in depth, interesting and intriguing read. Appreciate the author's keen insights and his credit-references

    Alan Ford Today, 07:12 PM Go to last post
    Phil Dagosto

    John Kenneth Galbraith: A Hero in our Time

    I'm pretty sure they can do the arithmetic. Their counter argument would be that JFK would have done the same as LBJ and escalated the war so the result

    Phil Dagosto Today, 05:59 PM Go to last post
    Lauren Johnson

    Tosh Plumlee

    Peter, I know you and Dawn have met with TP. I know only what you two have said.

    His story just doesn't add up. If you want to "abort"

    Lauren Johnson Today, 05:48 PM Go to last post