View RSS Feed

Alan Ford

Title Goes Here

Rate this Entry
Happy Spring!

Let's set our focus once again upon the only unidentified individual in Commission Exhibit 1381, where in a string of FBI statements no one claims the specific position where he stands on Friday, November 22, 1963 *before, *during and *after the ambush of a duly elected representative of the People.

Here he is amid ongoing enhancement ---->

and once more--*AF914--zooming in upon his head ---->
*AF1201

Excuse me for a second, Fido is signaling with his wet nose he wants to go out and answer Nature's call. Brat.

Now, back to the theme of today's post. Using the available evidence that wasn't contrived, nor should have seen the light of day, Let's follow this man's movements *before, *during and *after our beloved president was slain by a Judas cabal gone mad.

Let's begin with his brown shirt worn that afternoon, courtesy of Warren Commission Exhibit 150 ---->

and now a frontal of their evidence

Familiarize yourself with the colour and shape of these images...it will make for much easier recall as we delve deeper into this post. We already see in the previous images how the pattern corresponds with the only unidentified individual in CE 1381.

Let's establish that just minutes before the presidential limousine enters the ambush zone where the wrongly accused was. In his September 25, 1977 appearance before the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), James "Junior" Jarman shares within his testimony a key component of his own timeline movements. He tells the Committee he and a fellow Texas School Book Depository (TSBD) employee, Harold Norman, left their initial positions in front of the building to return inside and take a rear elevator up to the 5th floor.

Simultaneously, at this particular time between 12:23PM--12:25PM (Jarman's words, not mine), Charles Bronson was filming, aiming his camera at this point in time trained upon the corner of Houston and Elm, where an ambulance is seen in his film, coming to the aide of a gentleman experiencing an epileptic seizure. What's more, Bronson's camera also pans the TSBD, where there is movement of two individuals in the southeast sixth floor window.

*Save Here...to fetch Fido.

None of those two individuals were the wrongly accused, who at this same time was sitting downstairs in the rear lunch room on the first floor. We know this time is confirmed via the wrongly accused telling his interrogators how many people he saw at this time, and their specific colours and names as well (Jarman & Norman). Not possible for anyone up on the sixth floor facing the front of the building laying in ambush (please excuse the eyeroll) to have any idea what was happening at the rear of the building, let alone what floor any specific action occurs.

Now, after confirming Jarman's Committee testimony, the wrongly accused now makes his way towards to the front of the building, at some point stepping outside into the crisp Autumn air, where he is captured *before (Wiegman film); *during (Couch film); and, *after (Darnell film) the ambush.

So, let's now turn our attention to where Mr. Brown Shirt goes and does looong after he is supposed to be in the same space as Officer Tippitt way across town.

*BRB...

Mr. Frazier (Buell Wesley) offers up a curious observation about the wrongly accused being at the corner of Houston & Elm. His words bears truth. Here's the wrongly accused, courtesy of photographer Ernest Charles Mantesana (filming during the aftermath of the ambush), capturing the gentleman wearing CE 150's clothing (a brown shirt and grey coloured pants) ---->

and here's a close up ---->
*Credit: Mantesana

Let's track their clothing evidence to the next destination. After Mr. Frazier makes his observation of seeing the wrongly accused up on the corner there (smart move, Mr. Frazier, to hedge your bets, sneaking in a clue without revealing your hand wink-wink), he is captured again in the filming sequences of the Martin and Hughes film returning to the steps leading into the TSBD ---->

Here's the Warren Commission's clothing evidence again, walking up the stairs and into the TSBD (note colour of shirt and pants) ---->



*Credit: Martin

Again, nowhere near the 10th & Patton scene across town as the decades old tall-tale implies...

Of course, there's yet two more occasions we see Mr. Brown Shirt wearing their evidence--brown shirt & grey coloured pants...at his Midnight Press Conference, where he is professing his innocent; and in the next photo outside of the Texas Theatre as well ---->


Texas Theatre

Lest anyone thinks even for a second that the Brown Shirt man is Billy Nolan Lovelady the following picture should clear that up (note balding Lovelady on the right-bottom) ---->


*Credit: Martin Film, taken after 12:55PM on Friday, November 22, 1963

The last time we see the wrongly accused in CE-150 is here ---->

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6rKt4xovdw

What a very telling remark, "I don't even know what I'm here for"....There's a reason for that. The wrongly accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.
Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AF1201.jpg 
Views:	404 
Size:	5.2 KB 
ID:	9725   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AF914.gif 
Views:	251 
Size:	141.0 KB 
ID:	9726   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	martinmentesana-1ERNEST CHARLES MENTESANA.jpg 
Views:	244 
Size:	49.0 KB 
ID:	9729   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CE150-Oswald-Brown-Shirt.jpg 
Views:	245 
Size:	75.5 KB 
ID:	9727   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	33Front.jpg 
Views:	247 
Size:	44.2 KB 
ID:	9728  

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Mantesana.jpg 
Views:	237 
Size:	15.5 KB 
ID:	9730   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AF544C.gif 
Views:	237 
Size:	909.5 KB 
ID:	9731   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A.jpg 
Views:	241 
Size:	9.9 KB 
ID:	9732   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	martin-61712dot50PM.jpg 
Views:	246 
Size:	36.2 KB 
ID:	9733  
Share/Bookmark

Updated 05-05-2019 at 04:41 PM by Alan Ford

Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Alan Ford's Avatar
    Notes:

    *Follow up on both Pierce Allman and Terrance Ford substantiation of Oswald’s account of directing them to a phone in the lobby on the first floor (this action is not consistent w/an assassin making a quick exit out of Dodge). But certainly consistent with someone who was taking in the scene around him without a care in the world.

    *Then rework/review the wrongly accused in NO ----->

    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...6535&FORM=VIRE

    Some government entity is financing his activities (so much for all the horse manure about a loner ---->
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tInqL3g6vJw

    *Continue to work the bright and contrast buttons on Warren De Brueys, especially in clip w/staged fight scene in NO. These guys lead an innocent lamb to slaughter.

    while reviewing above film later this week...
    fetch some Eagles and use this classic for now ---->

    American Rock Band Three Dog Night Classic Hit

    Thursday, May 23, 2019: Updated Today at 05:12 PM by Alan Ford


    insert Eagles songs for listening purposes while composing... Here

    In spite of Warren Claude De Brueys (RIP) denial that he ever knew the wrongly accused, between the revealing revelation of New Orleans FBI Informant Orest Pena and the emergence of a figure in both the Mentesana Film in Dallas, and film capture in New Orleans during the staged scuffle between the wrongly accused and Carlos Bringuier, it's evident De Brueys--like many others in this case--is lying. Will continue to review both films before sharing more here (want to be 100% correct that the figure in both those films are in fact Mr. De Brueys).

    Rather than reach out to Denise on a false pretext to confirm something a family member of his would know beyond a shadow of doubt, I'll play this clean and ethically; and, will double-back here with confirmation after Labour Day.

    Speaking of lying, here's De Brueys in less than 3-5 seconds trying to get his story straight in an exchange with congressional counsel in the mid-70's ---->

    1:12PM Venture back in a few...

    continuation resumes ----->

    Mr. Wallach: Did you know Red Smith on the border patrol?
    Mr. DeBrueys: I think I do if he was an elderly gentleman, a big guy.
    Mr. Wallach: No, he wouldn’t have been that old.
    Mr. Debrueys: The name rings a bell. I can’t associate it with a face at the moment. Red Smith, it seems to me he might have been a person I’ve seen him maybe a half dozen times. A short individual, youngish at that time in his 30s.
    Mr. Wallach: That sounds about right.

    So, Which is it, Mr. DeBrueys, an elderly gentleman?, a big guy?, Or, now a young? dwarf sir?!
    Are you sure, Mr. DeBrueys, your FBI Informant Orest Pena is mistaken when he puts you and your other FBI Informant Oswald in close proximity in New Orleans on a daily basis....

    For remainder of Summer, will construct the timeline of the wrongly accused from James "Junior" Jarman's sighting downstairs on the first floor, out into the crisp Autumn air; a brief return inside to the downstairs storage room; his sighting by Mr. Campbell & his party returning inside; then add both Pierce Allman and Terrance Ford substantiation of Oswald’s account of directing them to a phone in the lobby on the first floor; and, from here develop his movement to the corner of upper Elm and Houston as captured in Mentasena film, and, confirmed of this position via Mr. Frazier's recent admissions/reveals about the wrongly accused on Houston.

    From here, Martin & Hughes captures him and his familiar clothing colours (brown shirt & grey pants) venturing back inside the TSBD just before 1PM. From here, given the testimony of New Orleans FBI agent Quigley, determine if the gentleman in the hat on the upper landing may have ties to ONI (Office of Naval Intelligence), Quigley mentions NO was aware of the wrongly accused and his ONI file as early as April, 1961.

    Review the black gentleman's testimony again about just who he seen w/Truly at the elevator (his testimony makes it crystal clear it's not a white helmeted motorcycle officer). Then return to Pierce Allman's recollection of the three men in suits (DeBrueys, an ONI representative and potentially the handler of the real culprit Baker encountered walking away from him on an upper floor instead of the horse manure masquerading as evidence we've been forced fed now for decades.

    Wouldn't hurt to touch base with someone in the Negro, Black community in Dallas and determine IF the lay of the land in the early 60's would make them lie if coerced by Jim Crow society figures in authority. *Try a church-congregation to ask someone in their mid to late seventies rather than just asking someone at random on the street (also say Black instead of Negro, someone may take offense, no sense in getting my northern Yankee arse kicked).

    The key here is we know from FBI Informant Orest Pena's congressional testimony that DeBrueys left NO when the wrongly accused did. What did DeBrueys know before following the wrongly accused from New Orleans to Dallas? I am 99.9% certain that DeBrueys is captured in close proximity with the wrongly accused in New Orleans and Dallas. The research community deserves 100% confirmation, so that said, Best Wishes to all for a safe & wonderful Memorial Day celebration, and a memorable Summer ahead amid an abundance of good health & happiness.

    PS: may not mean anything, but if time permits research the significance--if there is any--of Pena & the wrongly accused getting their passports on the same day, June 24, 1963.

    Wind of Change

    Pink Floyd


    Updated 05-23-2019 at 06:12 PM by Alan Ford