Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Seeking the O. P. Wright/Tomlinson deposition re: ce399 pointed nose

  1. Default Seeking the O. P. Wright/Tomlinson deposition re: ce399 pointed nose

    Ok folks, I opened my mouth in a discussion, a very friendly one about the "sworn testimony" (wrong term I know) that the magic bullet was not and could not be the "stretcher bullet" and Manchester/FBI be damned.

    Problem being I have looked for that doc online and in hard materials and I have not found the darn thing yet.
    Our discussion will continue.
    I could buy 6 Seconds in Dallas but I thought I had the doc somewhere.
    Read not to contradict and confute;
    nor to believe and take for granted;
    nor to find talk and discourse;
    but to weigh and consider.
    FRANCIS BACON

  2. Default Lemme talk about manufactured memory

    I just put my hands on a copy of "Six Seconds In Dallas".

    I would have been willing to swear that the document I seek was in that book.

    The denial of the FBI agent and Messrs. Tomlinson and Wright of the CE 399 "magic-specter-bullet" I have found in detail. No deposition of the "civilians" I truly thought was in that book could I find.

    The truth of my point was accepted by the person I had the discussion with at the next part of the conversation before Thursday night's BORadio show.

    Carl Ogelsby was right as I really thought there was a copy of the depositions in that book and I had let my memory shape my view of evidence. A no - no.
    Live and learn.

    Ok. It maybe time to reread some of the first generation material again for me.
    Read not to contradict and confute;
    nor to believe and take for granted;
    nor to find talk and discourse;
    but to weigh and consider.
    FRANCIS BACON

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Hackett II View Post
    I just put my hands on a copy of "Six Seconds In Dallas".

    I would have been willing to swear that the document I seek was in that book.

    The denial of the FBI agent and Messrs. Tomlinson and Wright of the CE 399 "magic-specter-bullet" I have found in detail. No deposition of the "civilians" I truly thought was in that book could I find.

    The truth of my point was accepted by the person I had the discussion with at the next part of the conversation before Thursday night's BORadio show.

    Carl Ogelsby was right as I really thought there was a copy of the depositions in that book and I had let my memory shape my view of evidence. A no - no.
    Live and learn.

    Ok. It maybe time to reread some of the first generation material again for me.
    Carl was "right" about a lot of things, but what are you specifically referencing here?

    Dawn.

  4. Default Thanks Dawn for your reply and interest

    QUOTE Me:[ Carl Ogelsby was right as I really thought there was a copy of the depositions in that book and I had let my memory shape my view of evidence. A no - no.] UNQUOTE Me

    Though I found this sentence clear,
    Thanks Dawn let me explain. But after I thank you for your interest and reply.

    I would have sworn that there is a copy of O.P. Wright or Tomlinson's sworn deposition re: CE 399 in "6 Seconds In Dallas".
    Not being the copper jacketed lie and not being round nosed lie either as the NARA CE 399 lie is now.
    I would have sworn the deposition(s) was/were reproduced in Thompson's work.

    I bragged in a BOR greet n feed gathering about the lack of verification for CE 399 in a conversation, and cited "6 Seconds in Dallas".
    I bought a copy and searched again and again for the depositions in that book.
    I found no such.

    The reference is on page 175 in note 17.

    The reason I referenced Carl was he cautioned us to have extra care to not warp the evidence to fit our own view of the crime. I had done just that as my memory of that deposition was bogus for location.

    The discussion guest in my home conceded the point of a bogus CE 399 based on Thompson's book and a little thing Mr. Jack White did about lands-and-grooves changing between Lie 1 and Lie 2 (WC and HSCA).

    My so called manufactured memory was wrong, but the issue is Not.
    Jim
    Last edited by Jim Hackett II; 04-23-2013 at 02:20 PM.
    Read not to contradict and confute;
    nor to believe and take for granted;
    nor to find talk and discourse;
    but to weigh and consider.
    FRANCIS BACON

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •