Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Anthrax Deception - by Graeme MacQueen - New Book on the Anthrax 'attacks'.

  1. #1

    Default Anthrax Deception - by Graeme MacQueen - New Book on the Anthrax 'attacks'.

    THE 2001 ANTHRAX
    DECEPTION
    The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy
    Graeme MacQueen

    ISBN: 978-0-9860731-2-0
    $19.95 / 214 pp. / 2014









    E-BOOK: $16.00
    ISBN: 978-0-9860731-3-7




    • SYNOPSIS

      The 2001 anthrax letter attacks in the United States killed five people and
      wounded dozens. They were widely blamed on extremist Muslims and
      their backers and used to support the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

      They were also used to justify and hasten the passage of the USA
      PATRIOT Act, which was being presented to Congress just as the first
      anthrax victim grew ill.

      In October 2001, one of the hypotheses that gained ground was that of
      the Double Perpetrator, the claim that al-Qaeda was carrying out the
      attacks with the support of Iraq. Much evidence was put forth to support
      this Double Perpetrator hypothesis but independent scientists soon
      discovered that the anthrax spores came from a domestic lab in the US
      serving the military and intelligence communities, not from al-Qaeda or
      Iraq.

      The FBI then quickly claimed that an individual was responsible for the
      attacks and began noisily looking for this “lone wolf.” In 2008 the Bureau
      named Dr. Bruce Ivins of the US Army Medical Institute of Infectious
      Disease as the “anthrax killer.” Although the FBI remains committed to
      the Ivins hypothesis, the case has been disintegrating for the last three
      years. Currently, it is justly held in contempt not merely by scientists who
      worked with Ivins but by many journalists as well as several US senators.
      But this raises the question: if Ivins did not commit this crime, who did?

      This book presents evidence to support the following points:
      (a) The anthrax attacks were carried out by a group of perpetrators, not
      by a “lone wolf.” The attacks were, therefore, the result of a conspiracy—
      by definition a plan by two or more people, made in secret and resulting
      in an immoral or illegal act.

      (b) The group that carried out this crime consisted, in whole or in part, of
      insiders deep within the US state apparatus.

      (c) These insiders were the same people who planned the 9/11 attacks

      (d) The anthrax attacks were meant to facilitate a seizure of power by the
      executive branch of government through intimidation of Congress and
      US civil society. They were also designed to achieve public acquiescence
      to and support for the redefinition of US foreign policy, replacing the Cold
      War with a new and aggressive global conflict framework, the Global War
      on Terror.





    • AUTHOR

      Graeme MacQueen received his Ph.D. in
      Buddhist Studies from Harvard University
      and taught in the Religious Studies
      Department of McMaster University for 30
      years. While at McMaster he became
      founding Director of the Centre for Peace
      Studies at McMaster, after which he helped
      develop the B.A. program in Peace Studies
      and oversaw the development of peace-
      building projects in Sri Lanka, Gaza, Croatia
      and Afghanistan. Graeme was a member of
      the organizing committee of the Toronto
      Hearings held on the 10th anniversary of
      9/11 and is co-editor of The Journal of 9/11
      Studies.



    TABLE OF CONTENTS



    Acknowledgements

    1. Introduction

    2. The 2001 Anthrax Attacks

    3. War and Civil Liberties

    4. Anthrax and Civil Liberties

    5. Perpetrator Hypotheses

    6. Advance Knowledge of the Attacks

    7. The Hijacker Connection

    8. The Unthinkable

    9. Conclusion

    Appendix




    REVIEWS

    "Professor MacQueen provides yet another piece of the puzzle connecting the
    terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 to the immediately following anthrax
    attacks of October 2001 that were indisputably conducted by Agents of the
    United States government."
    Francis A. Boyle, author of the U.S.domestic implementing legislation for the
    1972 Biological Weapons Convention.

    "Finally, a book has come out that explodes the FBI's anthrax letters case. Not
    only is there no evidence linking Army scientist Bruce Ivins to the crime--it turns
    out his famous flask of anthrax was never proven to be related to the attack
    spores! MacQueen peeks behind the curtain, showing that nothing about the
    anthrax letters case is as it seems."
    Meryl Nass, MD, consultant on the prevention and mitigation of bioterrorism for
    the Director of National Intelligence and the World Bank

    “Graeme MacQueen provides abundant evidence that the anthrax attacks and the
    9/11 attacks, both of which scared the American people into war, were carried out
    by the same people – people highly placed in the U.S. government.”"
    – David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor Revisited and numerous books
    on the 9/11 attacks

    "MacQueen's book is a combination of hard reporting and exploring implications
    of the reporting. It is not a theory. It advances our factual knowledge. It provides
    more erosion of the official story."
    Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Former Asst. Sect, US Treasury

    "In The 2001 Anthrax Deception, Dr. MacQueen uncovers the multiple ways
    Americans were manipulated to believe in their aftermath that the 9-11 attacks and
    the anthrax attacks were a one-two punch delivered by Muslim terrorists with
    Iraqi support. Later, when the fact could not be denied that the source of the
    anthrax attacks was an American military biolab, all the elaborate claims and
    stories about the connections between 9-11 and anthrax disappeared. Dr.
    MacQueen shows that indeed 9-11 and anthrax were connected, and that the
    false-flag, inside job characteristic that inexorably became part of the official
    version of the anthrax attacks must also apply to 9-11."
    Barry Kissin, American attorney and author of
    The Truth About The Anthrax Attacks


    "... bites through the “conspiracy theory" taboo to demonstrate in fine detail the
    key administration and media accusations following one propaganda scenario
    after another to deceive the public into panic and war fever to frame al-Qaeda and
    enact its larger global domination project.."
    John McMurtry,
    Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada and University Professor (Emeritus)
    The Cancer Stage of Capitalism / from Crisis to Cure (2013).

    "Professor Graeme MacQueen has written a must-read book on the anthrax
    attacks on America: The 2001 Anthrax Deception. Even those of us who have paid
    close attention to – and written broadly on – the 2001 anthrax attacks will learn
    stunning new information."
    Washington's Blog

    "When I received The 2001 Anthrax Deception I immediately read it cover to cover.
    I consider the topic to be urgently important, and MacQueen's treatment of it I
    consider excellent -- one of the most important and persuasive 9/11 books I have
    read."
    Peter Dale Scott, author of
    The American Deep State

    "Two of the six events that occurred on 9/11/2001 are especially problematic: the
    collapse of World Trade Center Building Seven and the Anthrax episode. The
    perpetrators of the crimes of 9/11 made serious mistakes or encountered
    unexpected obstacles to their plans for Building Seven and the Anthrax attacks.
    These produced glaring holes in the official explanations for these events. The
    absurdity of the NIST explanation for the collapse of Building Seven-- office fires--
    has been well-researched and exposed as untenable by numerous respected
    engineers and scientists. But the anthrax attacks have gone relatively
    unexamined up to this point. Prof. Gra
    eme MacQueen in his carefully
    documented book,
    The 2001 Anthrax Deception, has now filled this gap, . He
    makes a persuasive case that the official explanation and the assignment of guilt
    are false and unsupported by the evidence. The question now is how long we will
    have to wait for an honest grand jury investigation of the greatest crime in
    American history."

    David A. Johnson, PhD., FAICP
    Prof. Emeritus of Planning, The University of Tennessee
    If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.” - Frederick Douglass
    "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
    "Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn

  2. Default

    I've ordered this and will post thoughts once I've read it, but I'm expecting good things. Here's Graeme MacQueen talking about the book on the Corbett Report -

    http://www.corbettreport.com/intervi...rax-deception/

  3. #3

    Default

    This chap was on The Corbett Report not long ago. It was quite an interesting episode:

    http://www.corbettreport.com/intervi...rax-deception/
    “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.”
    ― Leo Tolstoy,

  4. #4

    Default

    This looks like a great book. I think I may have to get this one. I'll look forward to your review Anthony. Investigation of the anthrax attacks by the MSM was dropped early in the piece when it was realized it was a US production and only the intrepid truth seekers continued.
    "I think it would be a good idea." Mahatma Gandhi, when asked what he thought of Western civilization.

    The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it.
    Karl Marx.

    "Well, he would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies, 1963, replied Ms Rice Davies when the prosecuting counsel pointed out that Lord Astor denied an affair or having even met her.

  5. #5

    Default

    The Anthrax attacks (which were part and parcel of '9-11') are one of the easiest give-aways that the whole event, as well as the surrounding events, were yet another (of all too many) staged false-flag magic show - complete with patsies, shock and awe, 'Terrorizing' of the American populace, keeping their thumb on their places for War and more wars, setting the stage for the Big Ponzi Scheme, controlled media assets, The Big Lie, false and controlled 'investigations', and just a Potemkin Villiage stage-front veneer of reality - while the Truth was hidden in plain sight behind......... see the other Forum threads on Anthrax....
    If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.” - Frederick Douglass
    "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
    "Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn

  6. Default

    Received it yesterday, finished it today. It's an outstanding book and MacQueen has done a lot of careful research, some into areas that have been largely overlooked or forgotten, and then near the end of the book (in a subtle, startling and brilliantly argued chapter titled 'The Unthinkable') into an area that I suspect has never been addressed by any prior researcher in print. I thoroughly recommend the book, and I hope that more longtime, serious 9/11 researchers will join MacQueen and Kevin Ryan in writing books about the aspects of 9/11 study that most compel them. As a heads-up, while Amazon still doesn't have copies in stock, I ordered mine from Book Depository US and received it here in Australia a week or so later. Will chat more about the book after others have read it, but it gets a big thumbs up from me.
    Last edited by Anthony Thorne; 11-04-2014 at 10:44 PM.

  7. #7

    Default

    Video of Graeme MacQueen talking about WTC7, with an intro by Bill Pepper:

    “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.”
    ― Leo Tolstoy,

  8. #8

    Default

    Nomi Prins has names this as one of her books of the year:

    http://www.nomiprins.com/thoughts/20...mber-2014.html
    “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.”
    ― Leo Tolstoy,

  9. #9

    Default



    the first half is MacQueen on Anthrax and 911.
    Last edited by Peter Lemkin; 12-27-2014 at 05:48 PM.
    If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.” - Frederick Douglass
    "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
    "Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn

  10. #10

    Default

    Graeme MacQueen interviewed by Lars Schall:

    “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.”
    ― Leo Tolstoy,

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •